THE TECHNIQUE OF PSYCHOSEMANTIC ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ ATTITUDES TO SELF-EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES
Iryna Martyniuk
National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1644-5381
PDF 99-108 (Українська)

Keywords

psychosemantic analysis
semantic differential
attitude to self-education activity
students
types of self-educational activity of students

How to Cite

Martyniuk, I. (2021). THE TECHNIQUE OF PSYCHOSEMANTIC ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ ATTITUDES TO SELF-EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES. PSYCHOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 7(4), 99-108. https://doi.org/10.31108/1.2021.7.4.10

Abstract

The article presents the author’s technique analysing psychosemantically students’ attitudes to self-educational activities, which can be used in psychological and pedagogical practice both for research purposes and for psychological and pedagogical assistance for students by developing their readiness for self-education. It is substantiated that the study of the constructs of students’ consciousness, which reflect their attitudes to different self-educational activities, using the method of semantic differential, makes it possible to identify: how difficult to implement self-educational activities (including specific activities, such as reading of scientific-professional literature); what self-education means to them; how it affects students; how students understand the importance of such activities for their professional development; how they are interested in these activities and whether they are active in their implementation; to what degree  self-education is modern, dynamic; deepness of   awareness of what is learned through self-education; the regularity of their self-educational activities; the degree of independence in such activity organization and implementation; effectiveness of self-educational activities. During technique development, twenty-eight scales were identified, which made up the final version of the semantic differential matrix: 1) Fatiguing – Mobilizing, 2) Disciplinary – Relaxing, 3) Effective – Ineffective, 4) Interfering – Helping, 5) With help– Independent, 6) Significant – Unimportant, 7) Externally directed – Self-motivated, 8) Easily accessible – Hard to access, 9) Easy to implement – Difficult to implement, 10) Mass – Individual, 11) Full of meaning – Nonsense, 12) Not worth the effort – Worth the effort, 13) Not worth the attention – Worth the attention, 14) Uninformative – Informative, 15) Necessary – Useless, 16) Unnecessary – Demanded, 17) Unacceptable – Desirable, 18) Unproductive – Effective, 19) New – Traditional, 20) Boring – Interesting, 21) Passively carried out – Actively carried out, 22) Superficial – Deep, 23) Constant – Situational, 24) Regular – Rare, 25) Various – Monotonous, 26) Systematic – Chaotic, 27) Modern – Old-fashioned, 28) Harmful – Important. The expressed differentiating ability of the technique was substantiated. The stages of technique development were described.

 

PDF 99-108 (Українська)

References

Abakumova, E. B. (2012). Teoryia voprosa samoobrazovanyia v fylosofskoi, psykholoho-pedahohycheskoi y sotsyolohycheskoi lyterature [Theory of the question of self-education in philosophical, psychological, pedagogical and sociological literature] // Aktualnye zadachy pedahohyky: materyaly II mezhdunar. nauch. konf. (h. Chyta, yiun 2012 h.). Chyta: Yzdatelstvo Molodoi uchenуі [in Russian].

Balykaeva, M. B. (2008). Sovremennye podkhody k yzuchenyiu formyrovanyia samoobrazovanyia v otechestvennoi pedahohycheskoi nauke [Modern approaches to the study of the formation of self-education in domestic pedagogical science] // Kachestvo. Ynnovatsyy. Obrazovanye. Obshchye problemы obrazovanyia. № 5. S. 30 ‒ 33. [in Russian].

Buriak, V. K. (2002). Umovy ta zasoby samoosvity studentiv [Conditions and means of self-education of students] // Vyshcha shkola. № 6. S. 18 – 29. [in Ukrainian].

Dereza, I. S. (2010). Formuvannia hotovnosti studentiv do samoosvity yak aktualna pedahohichna problema [Formation of students' readiness for self-education as an urgent pedagogical problem] // Pedahohika vyshchoi ta serednoi shkoly. Vyp. 27. Kryvyi Rih: KDPU. S. 43 – 49. [in Ukrainian].

Yvanova, M. A. (2010). Samoobrazovatelnaia deiatelnost kak hlavnoe uslovye, neobkhodymoe dlia razvytyia professyonalnoi kompetentnosty u studentov ynzhenernykh vuzov v sovremennykh uslovyiakh [Self-educational activity as the main condition necessary for the development of professional competence in students of engineering universities in modern conditions] / Sbornyk nauchnykh statei «Problemy systemnoi modernyzatsyy эkonomyky Rossyy: sotsyalno-polytycheskyi, fynansovo-ekonomycheskyi y ekolohycheskyi aspekty». SPb.: Ynstytut byznesa y prava. // Rezhym dostupa: http://www.ibl.ru/konf/021210/109/html. [in Russian].

Kaluhyn, Yu. E. (2003). Vydy samoobrazovanyia [Types of self-education] // Dopolnytelnoe obrazovanye. № 2. S. 16. [in Russian].

Kaluhyn Yu. E., Zuikova M. O. (2013). Hotovnost k professyonalnomu samoobrazovanyiu studentov vuza [Readiness for professional self-education of university students] // Humanytarnыe, sotsyalno-ekonomycheskye y obshchestvennыe nauky. № 4. // http://www.onlinescience.ru/m/products/pedagogical_sciense/gid554/pg0/ [in Russian].

Martyniuk, I. A. (2015). Sutnist poniattia «samoosvitnia diialnist osobystosti» [The essence of the understanding "self-awareness of the intelligence of the specialty"] // Teoretychni ta prykladni problemy psykholohii : zb. nauk. prats. T. 2, №3(38). Sieverodonetsk, 2015. S. 204–217. [in Ukrainian].

Martynyuk, I. A. (2017). Metody diagnostyky gotovnosti osobystosti do samoosvitnʼoyi diyalʼnosti [Methods of diagnosing the readiness of the individual for self-educational activities] // "Visnyk Kyyivsʼkogo nacionalʼnogo universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Seriya Psyhologiya" ‒ Bulletin of the Taras Shevchenko National Universuty of Kyiv, Psychology series, 1(6)/2(7), 96–99 [in Ukrainian].

Martyniuk, I. A. (2019). Typy stavlennia studentskoi molodi do samoosvitnoi diialnosti [Types of attitude of student youth to self-educational activities] // Problemy suchasnoi psykholohii : Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Kamianets-Podilskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Ivana Ohiienka; Instytutu psykholohii imeni H. S. Kostiuka NAPN Ukrainy. Vyp. 46. Kamianets-Podilskyi: Aksioma. S. 240 – 265. [in Ukrainian].

Martyniuk, I. A. (2020). Metodyka doslidgennia hotovnosti studentskoi molodi do samoosvitnoi diialnosti [Methodology for advancing the readiness of students to self-educated activity] // Psykholohichnyi chasopys : Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Instytutu psykholohii imeni H. S. Kostiuka NAPN Ukrainy. Tom 6. № 9. S. 58 – 67. https://www.apsijournal.com/index.php/psyjournal/article/view/1056/653 [in Ukrainian].

Martyniuk, I. A. (2020). Metodyka doslidgennia komponentiv hotovnosti studentskoi molodi do samoosvitnoi diialnosti [Methodology for advancing the components of readiness of students to self-educated activity] // Psykholohichnyi chasopys : Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Instytutu psykholohii imeni H. S. Kostiuka NAPN Ukrainy. Tom 6. № 10. S. 130 – 139. https://www.apsijournal.com/index.php/psyjournal/issue/view/42 [in Ukrainian].

Ovcharenko, V. A. (2011). Samoobrazovanye y tvorcheskoe razvytye lychnosty v protsesse professyonalnoi podhotovky studenta [Self-education and creative development of personality in the process of professional training of a student] // Vestnyk Assotsyatsyy vuzov turyzma y servysa. N 1. S. 63 ‒ 67. [in Russian].

Psykhosemantyka. Metod semantycheskoho dyfferentsyala [Psychosemantics. Semantic differential method]: uchebno-metodycheskoe posobye dlia stud. vyssh. ucheb. zav. / O. V. Kozhevnykova, S. A. Viuzhanyna. Yzhevsk: Yzd. Tsentr «Udmurtskyi unyversytet», 2016. 120 s. [in Russian].

Sukhanov, P. V. (2013). Pedahohycheskaia kontseptsyia razvytyia samoobrazovatelnoi deiatelnosty studentov v uslovyiakh ynformatyzatsyy obrazovanyia [Pedagogical concept of the development of self-educational activities of students in the context of informatization of education] : avtoref. dyss. na soyskanye nauch. stepeny dokt. ped. nauk : spets. Kostroma. 54 s. [in Russian].

Chepeleva, N. V. (1992). Psykholohyia chtenyia uchebnoi y nauchnoi lyteratury v systeme professyonalnoi podhotovky studentov [Psychology of reading educational and scientific literature in the system of professional training of students]: dyss. … dokt. psykhol. nauk : 19.00.07 – pedahohycheskaia y vozrastnaia psykholohyia. K. 397 s. [in Russian].

Shaposhnikova, L. M. (2007). Rozvytok idei pro samoosvitu shkoliariv v istorii vitchyznianoi pedahohiky (kinets XIX – poch. XX st.) [Development of ideas about the self-education of schoolchildren in the history of modern pedagogy (the end of the 19th - early 20th century)] : avtoref. dys. na zdobuttia nauk. stupenia kand. ped. nauk : spets. 13.00.01 «Zahalna pedahohika ta istoriia pedahohiky». Zhytomyr. 20 s. [in Ukrainian].

Suhenko, Ya. (2018). Semantychnyj dyferencial dlya ocinky osvitnioyi trayektoriyi osobystosti [Semantic differential for assessing the educational trajectory of the individual] // Psyholingvistyka ‒ Psycholinguistics, 24, 1, 320–343 [in Ukrainian].

Iakovets, T. Ya. (2003). Kompleks pedahohycheskykh uslovyi formyrovanyia hotovnosty studentov vuza k samoobrazovanyiu [A complex of pedagogical conditions for the formation of university students' readiness for self-education] : dys. ... kand. ped. nauk : 13.00.01, 13.00.08 M. 210 s. [in Russian].

Klement, M., Chraska, M., Chraskova, M. (2014) The use of semantic differential method in identifying the opinions of university students on education realized through e-learning. 5th World Conference on Learning, Teaching and Educational Leadership. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277902291_The_Use_of_the_Semantic_Differential_Method_in_Identifying_the_Opininons_Of_University_Students_on_Education_Realized_Through_e-learning [in English].

Marogna, C., Caccamo, F., Salcuni, S., Nobile, F. University students and semantic differential: a pilot study comparing subjects who sought psychological help with subjects who did not. Testing, psychometrics, methodology in applied psychology. Vol. 23, No 3, September. URL: http://www.tpmap.org . [in English].

Osgood, Ch. Method of semantic differential in comparative culture studies. American Anthropologist. 1964 (June). Vol. 66. No. 3. P. 171–200. [in English].

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright Notice

Articles in the Psychological Journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. For more detailed information, please, fallow the link - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/