THE FORMAT AND CONTENT OF THE SEMANTIC ARCHITECTONICS OF CONSCIOUSNESS AND A "WORLD VIEW" AS ITS VARIABLE-SUBJECT CONCEPTUALIZATION
Svitlana Kalishchuk
Institute of Human Sciences, Borys Grinchenko University in Kyiv
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1749-7856
PDF 57-66 (Українська)

Keywords

semantic architectonics of consciousness
“world view”
a representative matrix
mnemonic contexts
semantic field
meaning

How to Cite

Kalishchuk, S. (2020). THE FORMAT AND CONTENT OF THE SEMANTIC ARCHITECTONICS OF CONSCIOUSNESS AND A "WORLD VIEW" AS ITS VARIABLE-SUBJECT CONCEPTUALIZATION. PSYCHOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 6(8), 57-66. https://doi.org/10.31108/1.2020.6.8.4

Abstract

The article presents two research plans (as a presentation and as a multidimensional content) for the semantic architectonics of personal consciousness and a "world view" as its variable-subject conceptualization. The systemic mental constructs of “semantic architectonics of personality consciousness” and “world view” are defined by the methodological analysis of the world’s image (representation) as a basic condition of mental life and the basis of mental activities. The procedural-dynamic analytic approach to the genesis of the semantic architectonics of consciousness is presented. The representative matrix model of the semantic architectonics of personal consciousness is described. We have determined and substantiated the main features of the representative matrix describing the systemic structural elements for experience reflection and accumulation. The specificity of the double (figurative and verbal) representation is revealed. The semantic architectonics of consciousness is considered as a multi-level, multi-format connected model. The “world view” representative actions are described as searches for meanings. The elements and operations of the “world view” representative matrix are determined. The hypothetical arrangement of the semantic architectonics of personal consciousness is substantiated. Its main elements are the multidimensional mnemonic context and local semantic fields. We have proposed the scheme of representative actions within the semantic architectonics of an individual’s consciousness, which reflects the logic and spiral dynamics of its functioning. We have determined that the "world view" meaningful representations as systemic variable-subject objectification of the semantic architectonics of an individual’s consciousness can be studied from four different perspectives: as a conceptual system, as a system transforming the objective world into an individual’s reality, as a set of strategies for an individual’s interaction with the environment and as a system of separate "world views". The real world is not so much explored by an individual as it is mastered and mentalized by them. The genesis of formed meanings is closely related to their regulatory actions and is manifested through the practical mediation of the basic elements of the “world view”.

 

PDF 57-66 (Українська)

References

Agafonov, A.Yu. (2000). Chelovek kak smyslovaya model mira. Prolegomeny k psihologicheskoj teorii smysla [Man as a semantic model of the world. Prolegomes to the psychological theory of meaning]. Samara: Bahrah [in Russian].

Agafonov, A.Yu. (2003). Osnovyi smyislovoy teorii soznaniya [Fundamentals of the semantic theory of consciousness]. Sankt-Peterburg: Rech [in Russian].

Artemeva, E.Yu. (1999). Psihologiya subektivnoj semantiki [Psychology of subjective semantics]. Moscow: Nauka [in Russian].

Byudzhental, Dzh. (2001). Iskusstvo psihoterapevta [The art of the psychotherapist]. Sankt-Peterburg: Piter [in Russian].

Vasilyuk, F.E. (1984). Psihologiya perezhivaniya (analiz preodoleniya kriticheskih situacij) [Psychology of experience (analysis of overcoming critical situations)]. Moscow: MGU [in Russian].

Velichkovskij, B.M. (1982). Sovremennaya kognitivnaya psihologiya [Modern cognitive psychology]. Moscow: MGU [in Russian].

Leontev, A.A. (1993). Yazykovoe soznanie i obraz mira [Linguistic consciousness and the image of the world]. Yazyk i soznanie: paradoksalnaya racionalnost ‑ Language and Consciousness: Paradoxical Rationality. Moscow: Institut yazykoznaniya RAN. 16-21 [in Russian].

Lengle, A. (2006). Person. Ekzistencialno–analiticheskaya teoriya lichnosti [Existential-analytical theory of personality]. Moscow: Genezis [in Russian].

Libin, A.V. (1998). Edinaya koncepciya stilya cheloveka: metafora ili realnost? Stil cheloveka: psihologicheskij analiz [A single concept of a person's style: metaphor or reality? Person's style: psychological analysis]. Moscow: Smysl [in Russian].

Lozova, O.M. & Yurevich, A.Yu. (2014). Psihosemantichnij zmist kartini svitu profesij abituriyentiv psihologichnih specialnostej [Psychosemantic content of the picture of the world of professions of entrants of psychological specialties]. Kompetentnisnij pidhid u profesijnij pidgotovci majbutnih psihologiv ‑ Competence approach in the training of future psychologists. Vinnicya: Vindruk [in Ukrainian].

Maksimenko, S.D. (2006). Genezis sushestvovaniya lichnosti [The genesis of the existence of personality]. Kiev: KMM [in Ukrainian].

Mamardashvili, M.K. & Pyatigorskij, A.M. (1997). Simvol i soznanie: metafizicheskie rassuzhdeniya o soznanii, simvolike i yazyke [Symbol and Consciousness: Metaphysical Discourse on Consciousness, Symbolism, and Language]. Moskva: Shkola «Yazyki russkoj kultury» Retrieved from https:// www. gtmarket.ru/laboratory/basis/3193 [in Russian].

Nalimov, V.V. (1989). Spontannost soznaniya: Veroyatnostnaya teoriya smyislov i smyislovaya arhitektonika lichnosti [Spontaneity of consciousness: Probabilistic theory of meanings and semantic architectonics of personality]. Moscow: Prometey [in Russian].

Petrenko, V.F. (2010). Vernem psihologii soznanie [Let us return consciousness to psychology].. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya Psihologiya ‑ Bulletin of Moscow University. Psychology Series. 2010. 3. 121—142 [in Russian].

Petuhov, V.V. (1984). Obraz mira i psihologicheskoe izuchenie myshleniya [The image of the world and the psychological study of thinking]. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 14. Psihologiya ‑ Moscow University Bulletin. 14. Psychology, 4. 13-20 [in Russian].

Pyuselik, R.F. & MakBi, A.Dzh. (2018). Voynyi realnosti. Terapiya dissotsiirovannogo sostoyaniya [Reality wars. Dissociated state therapy]. Odessa: VMV-print [in Ukrainian].

Rebeko, T.A. (1998). Mentalnaya reprezentaciya kak format hraneniya informacii [Mental representation as a format for storing information]. Mentalnaya reprezentaciya dinamika i struktura ‑ Mental Representation Dynamics and Structure. Moscow: IP RAN. 25 – 54 [in Russian].

Serkin, V.P. (2005). Struktura i funkcii obraza mira v prakticheskoj deyatelnosti [The structure and functions of the image of the world in practical activities.]. Dis. d-ra psihol. nauk. Moscow [in Russian].

Smirnov, I.V. & Beznosyuk, E.V. & Zhuravlev, A.N. (1995). Psihotehnologii: kompyuternyj psihosemanticheskij analiz i psihokorrekciya na neosoznavaemom urovne [Psychotechnology: computer psychosemantic analysis and psychocorrection at the unconscious level]. Moscow: Progress [in Russian].

Sokolovskaya, Zh.P. (1993). «Kartina mira» v znacheniyah slov. Semanticheskie fantazii ili katahezis semantiki [«Picture of the world» in the meanings of words. Semantic fantasies or the catachesis of semantics]. Simferopol: Tavriya [in Ukrainian].

Holodnaya, M.A. (2002). Psihologiya intellekta. Paradoksy issledovaniya [Psychology of intelligence. Paradoxes of research]. Sankt-Peterburg: Piter [in Russian].

Chepeleva, N. & Rudnickaya, S. (2019). Diskursivnye tehnologii samoproektiruyushejsya lichnosti [Discursive technologies of self-projecting personality]. Psycholinguistics 25(1), 363–383. https://doi.org: 10.31470/2309-1797-2019-25-1-363-383 [in Ukrainian].

Adler, A. (1932). What life should mean to you. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.

Clark, J. M. & Paivio, A. (1987). A dual Coding Perspective on Encoding Processes. Imagery and related Mnemonic Process Theories, Individual Differences, and Applications. 4. 5—33.

Fidler, F. (1968). Personality and situational determinants of leadership effectiveness. Group dinamics. Research and theory. N. Y.: Harper & Brothers.

May, R. (1969). Love and Will. New York: Norton & Company.

Le Ny, J.-F. (1998). Cross-cognitive aspects of discourse comprehension: Semantic postrepresentation. International Journal of psychology. 33 (6). 397 – 410.

Shepard, R. (1980) Multidimentional scaling, free-fitting, and clustering. Science. Vol. 210. 390-398.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright Notice

Articles in the Psychological Journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. For more detailed information, please, fallow the link - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/