THE PLANE OF THE TRANS-THEORETIC EXISTENTIAL-SYSTEMIC CONCEPT OF REORGANIZATION OF THE SEMANTIC ARCHITECTONICS OF AN INDIVIDUAL’S CONSCIOUSNESS
Svitlana Kalishchuk
Institute of Human Sciences of Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1749-7856
PDF 107-118 (Українська)

Keywords

transtheoretic
existential-systemic
meaning
reorganization
correlation
heuristic model
protocol of assistance
panic attacks

How to Cite

Kalishchuk, S. (2020). THE PLANE OF THE TRANS-THEORETIC EXISTENTIAL-SYSTEMIC CONCEPT OF REORGANIZATION OF THE SEMANTIC ARCHITECTONICS OF AN INDIVIDUAL’S CONSCIOUSNESS. PSYCHOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 6(4), 107-118. https://doi.org/10.31108/1.2020.6.4.9

Abstract

The article substantiates a list of questions about the mechanisms and conditions of the dynamics of semantic architectonics of an individual’s consciousness as a text. The link between self-organization and reorganization of the semantic architectonics of an individual’s consciousness and the generative property of personality as a complex system to self-movement and self-transformation, characterized by self-attribution, is proved. The postulated trans-theoretic existential-systemic concept is validated. We examined the concept composition, substantive elements, the rules of their interactions and mutual influence, the model of their organization, their participation and relevance at request solving and processing of levels, stages and procedural actions reorganizing the semantic architectonics of an individual’s consciousness. The procedure of theoretical-methodological research consisted of the following methods: the synergistic method to analyze interaction and consistency of paradigm bases when creating a new concept; the modeling method to determine the foundations of a built model; and the reconstruction method to determine a coordinate space as a unified methodological background for describing the diversity and heterogeneity of concepts used in the initial research approaches. The heuristic model of the trans-theoretic concept was constructed, which consisted of existential analysis, the theory of dynamical systems, individual psychology, transpersonal psychology, psychodrama and some practical branches - system modeling, decoding of experience, neurological levels, holotropic breathing. These components exhibited fundamental diversity, but at the same time, the essential unity of the existential-system concept and influence on the dynamics of an individual’s meanings, in particular, intentionally created meanings and the individual’s identity basis, and on a certain acqured life position as a source of meaning in a life situation. The integrative unity of the examined concept was achieved by the construct from the theory of dynamical systems, namely: the nonlinearity of development of complex systems, to which personality belongs. The synergistic relationships between the elements of the trans-theoretic existential-systemic concept were determined on the plane of the microstructure. The internal interaction of the concept elements covered five perspectives of actions, namely: system-determined, ontological, genetic, functional and content-contextual.

The dynamic processes of the reorganization of the semantic architectonics of consciousness are determined by common actions of the genetic, systemic and contextual planes of the existential-systemic concept, which shape and fill with content the ontological field of an individual’s existential reality; so the following key categories can be revealed: “self-attribution” and “dialogue exchange between the Self and the world”, “intentionality”, “the experience of meeting with oneself, the world and the world of other people”, “evolution”. The reorganization of the semantic architectonics of an individual’s consciousness is presented as a three-dimensional coordinate space with vectors. The protocol of the psychological assistance for clients with panic attacks is described, containing sequential steps and tasks of each of the vectors and the corresponding operations.

 

PDF 107-118 (Українська)

References

Agafonov, A.Yu. (2000). Chelovek kak smyslovaya model mira. Prolegomeny k psihologicheskoj teorii smysla [Man as a semantic model of the world. Prolegomes to the psychological theory of meaning]. Samara: BAHRAH – M [in Russian].

Agafonov, A.Yu. (2003). Osnovyi smyislovoy teorii soznaniya [Fundamentals of the semantic theory of consciousness]. Sankt-Peterburg: Rech [in Russian].

Bassin, F.V. (1973) K razvitiyu problemy znacheniya i smysla [To the development of the problem of meaning and meaning.]. Voprosy psihologii – Psychology Issues, 6, 13-23 [in Russian].

Bek, D., & Kovan, K. (2010). Spiralnaya dinamika. Upravlyaya cennostyami, liderstvom i izmeneniyami v XXI veke [Spiral dynamics. Managing values, leadership and change in the 21st century]. Moskva: Otkrytyj Mir, BestBusinessBooks [in Russian].

Ganzen, V.A. (1974). Vospriyatie celostnyh obektov [Perception of holistic objects]. Leningrad [in Russian].

Grof, S. (2008) Puteshestvie v poiskah sebya [Searching for yourself]. Moskva: AST [in Russian].

Dilts, R., & Gilligen, S. (2012). Puteshestvie Geroya. Put otkrytiya sebya [Hero's Journey. The way of discovering yourself]. Moskva: Psihoterapiya [in Russian].

Kalischuk, S.M. (2018) Sistemne modelyuvannya yak integrativniy metod osobistisnih zmin y usvidomlennya bagato-variativnosti zhittevoyi realnosti [System modeling as an integrative method of personal change and awareness of the multi-variability of life reality]. AktualnI problemi psihologiyi: Zbirnik naukovih prats Institutu psihologiyi imeni G. S. Kostyuka: Psihologiya navchannya. Genetichna psihologiya. Medichna psihologiya – Actual Problems of Psychology: Collection of Scientific Papers of the GS Kostyuk Institute of Psychology: Psychology of Education. Genetic psychology. Medical psychology, X, 31, 55-64. Kiyiv [in Ukrainian].

Kalishuk, S.M. (2020). Sub’yektivna model realnosti: pershodzherela pobudovi [The reality model is sub-active: persuaded]. Problemi suchasnoyi psihologiyi: Zbirnik naukovih prac Kam’yanec-Podilskogo nacionalnogo universitetu imeni Ivana Ogiyenka, Institutu psihologiyi imeni G.S. Kostyuka NAPN Ukrayini – Problems of Modern Psychology: Collection of Scientific Papers of Kamianets-Podilsky National University named after Ivan Ogienko, GS Psychological Institute. Kostyuk NAPN of Ukraine, 47, 93-118, DOI: 10.32626/2227-6246.2020-47.93-117 [in Ukrainian].

Leontev, D.A. (2018). Sinergetika i lichnost: k neravnovesnoj personologii [Synergetics and personality: towards nonequilibrium personology]. Metodologiya i istoriya psihologii –Methodology and history of psychology, 3, 96–104. Moskva [in Russian].

Lengle, A. (2011). Emocii i ekzistenciya [Emotion and Existence]. Harkov: Gumanitarnyj centr [in Ukrainian].

Mamardashvili, M.K., & Pyatigorskij, A.M. (1997). Simvol i soznanie: metafizicheskie rassuzhdeniya o soznanii, simvolike i yazyke [Symbol and Consciousness: Metaphysical Discourse on Consciousness, Symbolism, and Language]. Moskva: Shkola «Yazyki russkoj kultury» Retrieved from https:// www. gtmarket.ru/laboratory/basis/3193[in Russian].

Maksimenko, S.D. (2006). Genezis sushestvovaniya lichnosti [The genesis of the existence of personality]. Kiev: KMM [in Ukrainian].

Marua, M., & Frolov, I. (1987). Hrupkost zhizni [The fragility of life]. Novoe vremya – New time, 50, 39–41 [in Russian].

Maturana, U.R., & Varela, F.H. (2001). Drevo poznaniya [Tree of knowledge]. Moskva: Progress-tradiciya [in Russian].

Mitina, O.V. (2013). Ispolzovanie modeli logisticheskogo uravneniya dlya izucheniya dinamicheskih processov v psihologii i naukah o zhizni [Using the model of the logistic equation to study dynamic processes in psychology and life sciences]. Modelirovanie i analiz dannyh – Data modeling and analysis, 1, 61–77 [in Russian].

Moren, E. (2013). Metod: Priroda prirody [Method: Nature of nature]. Moskva: Kanon+ [in Russian].

Prohazka, Dzh., & Norkross, Dzh. (2007). Sistemy psihoterapii. Dlya konsultantov, psihoterapevtov i psihologov [Psychotherapy systems. For consultants, psychotherapists and psychologists]. Sankt-Peterburg: Prajm- EVROZNAK [in Russian].

Uilber, K. (2009). Integralnoe videnie. Kratkoe vvedenie v revolyucionnyj integralnyj podhod k zhizni, Bogu, vselennoj i vsemu ostalnomu [Integral Vision. A brief introduction to the revolutionary integrated approach to life, God, the universe and everything else]. Moskva: Otkrytyj Mir [in Russian].

Holms, P., & Karp, M. (2000). Psihodrama: vdohnovenie i tehnika [Psychodrama: inspiration and technique]. Moskva: Klass [in Russian].

Chiksentmihaji, M. (2017). Evolyuciya lichnosti [Personality evolution]. Moskva: Alpina non-fikshn [in Russian].

Yaroshevskij, M.G. (1981). Sechenov i mirovaya psihologicheskaya mysl [Sechenov and world psychological thought]. Moskva: Nauka [in Russian].

Graves, C.W. (1970). Levels of Existence: An Open System Theory of Values. The Journal of Humanistic Psychology. Fall 1970. Vol. 10. N. 2. pp. 131–154.

Adler, A. (1932). What life should mean to you. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.

Varela, F. (1955). Resonant Cell Fssemblies. Biological Research. P. 81–95.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright Notice

Articles in the Psychological Journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. For more detailed information, please, fallow the link - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/