Serhii Hrebinnyk
Mykola Hohol State University in Nizhyn
PDF 149-162 (Українська)


personality theory
personality typologies
theory of integral individuality

How to Cite



An article studies theoretically the latest psychodiagnostic models, the historical origins of individually-typological research and comparing stats of psychometric tests to find possibilities of integration of personology concepts concerning personality measurements.

The topic relevance is explained by the lack of decent attention to differential psychology in the Ukrainian scientific community. Another problem of individually-typological approach comes from the variety psychometric theories, so it is necessary to determine their conceptual and practical differences or similarities.

The article discusses the history of the key developmental stages of individual typological research, including psychophysiological, typological, personological concepts and psychometric measuring tests for a personality.

The most progressive psychodiagnostic concepts are reviewed, which are studied in this article scope: The Myers-Briggs typology and the MBTI questionnaire; The Big Five theory and the NEO-PI-R test; Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI); neurochemical model “Functional Ensemble of Temperament” (FET) (STQ-77); “Theory of Leading Tendencies”, ITO Test.

The conclusion show the possibility of mutual integration of psychometric models referred to the ideas revealed in V.S. Merlin's theory of integral individuality, by dividing personality diagnostics onto different research areas, such as “biological” (the concepts diagnosing a person’s innate characteristics) and “social-cultural” (the factor theories that studies a personality formed in ontogenesis).

Considering the prospects for further research, we indicate that the idea to integrate different personality research tendencies and approaches opens up wide opportunities for the further development of more advanced and detailed psychometric tests.


PDF 149-162 (Українська)


Abelskaya E.F. (2006) Tipovedcheskoe issledovanie psihicheskogo sklada lichnosti [Typological study of the psychic structure of personality]. Avtoref. dis…kand. psiholog. nauk 19.00.01. Ekaterinburg

Ananev, B. G. (1968). Chelovek kak predmet poznaniya [Human as a subject of cognizing]. Leningrad: Leningradskiy Universitet.

Ilin, E. P. (2011). Psihologiya individualnyih razlichiy [Psychology of individual differences]. Sankt-Peterburg: Piter.

Merlin, V. S. (1986). Ocherk integralnogo issledovaniya individualnosti [Essay on the integral study of personality]. Moskva: Pedagogika.

Sobchik, L. N. (1998). Vvedenie v psihologiyu individualnosti. Teoriya i praktika psihodiagnostiki [Introduction to the personality psychology. Theory and practice

Yung, K. G. (1997). Psihologicheskie tipyi [Psychological Types]. Sankt-Peterburg: Yuventa

Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47(1), i-171. DOI:10.1037/h0093360

Beebe, J. (2004). Understanding consciousness through the theory of psychological types. In Analytical psychology. New York, NY: Routledge.

Beebe, J. (2016). Energies and patterns in psychological type: The reservoir of consciousness. London: Routledge.

Butcher, J. N. (Ed.). (1996). International adaptations of the MMPI-2: Research and clinical applications. Minneapolis, MN, US: University of Minnesota Press.

Cattell, H. E. P., & Mead, A. D. (2008). The Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF). In G. J. Boyle, G. Matthews, & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment, Vol. 2. Personality measurement and testing (pp. 135-159). Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc. DOI:10.4135/9781849200479.n7

Eysenck, H. J. (1947). Dimensions of personality. Oxford, England: Kegan Paul.

Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative "description of personality": The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216-1229 DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216

Hathaway, S. R., & Meehl, P. E. (1951). An atlas for the clinical use of the MMPI. Oxford, England: U. Minnesota Press.

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1996). Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the five-factor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 51-87). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 159-181). New York, NY, US: The Guilford Press.

Myers, I. B., & Myers, P. B. (1995). Gifts differing: understanding personality type. Palo Alto, Calif.: Davies-Black Pub.

Rusalov, V. M. (1989). Object-related and communicative aspects of human temperament: A new questionnaire of the structure of temperament. Personality and Individual Differences, 10(8), 817-827.

Trofimova, I. (2017). Integrating the findings from boundary sciences for development of the DSM/ICD classifications. European Psychiatry, 41, S78. DOI:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.249

Trofimova, I., & Robbins, T. W. (2016). Temperament and arousal systems: a new synthesis of differential psychology and functional neurochemistry. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 64, 382-402. DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.03.008

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright Notice

Articles in the Psychological Journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. For more detailed information, please, fallow the link -