This research aim is to translate into Ukrainian, adapt and validate TIPI (Ten-Item Personality Inventory proposed by S.Gosling, P. Rentfrow, and W. Swann). Adaptation of this extremely brief measure, which is developed on the basis of the recognized theory of personality, provides methodological support for studies of a whole range of problems (multiple repeated measurements in the longitudinal study, large-scale surveys, pre-screening packet etc.). TIPI is translated into more than twenty languages, which confirms that it is being in demand. The psychometric properties of the adapted versions demonstrate its diagnostic capacity, which opens new perspectives for cross-cultural studies.
The article analyses the methodological framework of the TIPI, discusses the methodological problems of the inventory adaptation, and proposes the process of its adaptation and the ways to deal with the potential challenges. The inventory adaptation was done in several steps. At the first step, the inventory was translated by three independent translators, the unified translated version was agreed, the back-translation was done, and the reliability (internal consistency) was checked (with the sample of 233 undergraduate students). At the second step, the list of descriptors was expanded to improve the reliability and validity of the measure. The difficulties of the translation procedure resulted mainly from the difficulty of choosing such an ideal match for adjective descriptors that would express the content accurately and would be unambiguously interpreted. At the same time it is necessary to minimize intersections of the semantic fields for the selected descriptors. This new adapted version was examined with the sample of 405 participants. Internal reliability was checked with Cronbach’s alpha. Also test–retest reliability and the construct validity were verified by analysis of correlations between TIPI-UKR scales and corresponding scales of the existing five-factor multi-item scales (The Big Five Locator (adaptation of L.Burlachuk, D.Koroliov) and Five Factor Personality Questionnaire (adaptation of A.Hromov).
The psychometric characteristics of internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha for Extraversion - 0,6, Agreeableness - 0,6, Conscientiousness - 0,73, Emotional Stability - 0,44, and Openness to Experience - 0,74), test–retest reliability and the construct validity were examined. They confirmed that the adapted inventory has the adequate psychometric properties. The inventory blank is attached.
Vinogradov, A.G. (2015) «Zalezhit vid situatsii»: yakisniy analiz situatsiynih utochnen pri zapovnenni osobistisnih testiv. [“It depends on the situation”: Qualitative analysis of situational clarifications in personality assessment] Aktualni problemi, psihologii, pedagogiki, 28, 3, 14-25. [In Ukrainian]
Сaprara, G.V, Barbaranellі, C., Borgogni, L, Veccione M. (2010) BFQ-2 Opytuvalnik "Velyka pyatirka-2" : Posibnik. [BFQ-2 “Big Five-2” Questionnaire: Manual] Kyiv.: TOV "OS Ukraine”. [In Ukrainian]
Kornilova, T.V., Chumakova, M.A. (2016) Aprobatsiya kratkogo oprosnika Bolshoy pyaterki (TIPI, KOBT). [Approbation of short questionnaire of the Big Five (TIPI, COBT)] Psihologicheskie issledovaniya, 9, 46. 5. Available at: http://psystudy.ru [In Russian]
Osin, E.N., Rasskazova E.I., Neyaskina Y.Y., Dorfman L.A., Aleksandrova L.A. (2015) Operatsionalizatsiya pyatifaktornoy modeli lichnostnyih chert na rossiyskoy vyborke [Operationalization of five-factor model of personality lines on the Russian sample] Psihologicheskaya diagnostika, 3. 80-104. [In Russian]
Sergeeva, A. S., Kirillov, B. A., Dzhumagulova, A. F. (2016) Perevod i adaptacziya kratkogo pyatifaktornogo oprosnika lichnosti (TIPI-RU): oczenka konvergentnoj validnosti, vnutrennej soglasovannosti i test-retestovoj nadezhnosti. [Translation and adaptation of short five factor personality questionnaire (TIPI-RU): convergent validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability evaluation] Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya Vol. 9, no. 3, 138–154. doi:10.17759/exppsy.2016090311 [In Russian]
Brito-Costa, S., Moisao, A., De Almeida, H., Castro, F. (2015). Psychometric properties of the Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI). International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology. Revista INFAD de Psicología, Nº2, Vol.1, 115-121. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2015.n2.v1.328
Chiorri, C., Bracco, F., Piccinno, T., Modafferi, C., Battini, V. (2015). Psychometric properties of a revised version of the Ten Item Personality Inventory. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 31(2), 109-119. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000215
Costa, P. T. J, McCrae, R. R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 653–665. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(92)90236-I
Eysenck H. (1992) Four ways five factors are not basic. Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 13, Issue 6, 667-673. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(92)90237-J
Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., Swann, W. B., Jr. (2003). A Very Brief Measure of the Big Five Personality Domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504-528. doi:10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
Gunnarsson M., Gustavsson P., Holmberg S., Weibull L. (2015). Statistical evaluation of six short Five Factor Model personality measures aiming for potential inclusion in the SOM Institute’s national surveys. Available at: http://docplayer.net/21625580-Statistical-evaluation-of-six-short-five-factor-model-personality-measures-aiming-for-potential-inclusion-in-the-som-institute-s-national-surveys.html
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research,Vol. 2, 102–138. New York: Guilford Press.
Johnson J. A. (2017). Big-Five model. In V. Zeigler-Hill, T.K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences (1-16). New York: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1212-1
Muck, P. M., Hell, B., Gosling, S. D. (2007). Construct Validation of a short five-factor model instrument a self-peer study on the German adaptation of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI-G). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23 (3), 166–175. DOI 10.1027/1015-57126.96.36.199
Oshio, A., Abe, S., Cutrone, P., & Gosling, S. D. (2014). Further validity of the Japanese version of the Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI-J): Cross-language evidence for content validity. Journal of Individual Differences, 35, 236-244. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000145
Sergeeva A, Kirillov B, Dzhumagulova A (2018). Neural Network-based exploration of construct validity for Russian version of the 10-item Big Five Inventory. Digital Transformation and Global Society, 239-249 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-02846-6_19
Sorokowska A., Słowińska A., Zbieg A., Sorokowski, P. (2014). Polska adaptacja testu Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI) – TIPI-PL – wersja standardowa i internetowa. Wrocław: WrocLab. DOI: 10.13140/2.1.4811.5521
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles in the Psychological Journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. For more detailed information, please, fallow the link - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/