Inna Haletska
Ivan Franko National University in Lviv
Larysa Klymanska
Lviv Polytechnic National University
Maryna Klimanska
Ivan Franko National University in Lviv
PDF 18-36 (Українська)


life in quarantine
mental health
public health
psychological well-being
preventive behavior

How to Cite

Haletska, I., Klymanska, L., & Klimanska, M. (2020). QUARANTINE APRIL IN UKRAINE: THOUGHTS, EXPERIENCES, BEHAVIOUR FACED WITH THE THREAT OF COVID-19. PSYCHOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 6(5), 18-36. https://doi.org/10.31108/1.2020.6.5.2


The irresistible spread of the COVID-19 epidemic around the whole world and in Ukraine has become an objective threat to the stability and safety, not only personal but also to the established system of the world as a whole. Psychological factors are real determinants and predictors of overcoming the pandemic situation, as they potentially determine both: the preventive behaviour against the spread of coronavirus and the ability of individuals and communities to reorganize the established way of life. Because of unprecedented pandemic of the new coronavirus and the situation of global quarantine, it is important to analyze how people live in this new specific situation, what they do in their daily lives, what is the emotional state and psychological health in general, what is the attitude to the pandemic and quarantine, as well as adhering to preventive behaviour. The study was aimed to highlight behaviour, reasoning and emotional states depending on age and gender, analysis of adhering to preventive behaviour and its psychological factors.

The data were collected from the 3rd to the 30th of April 2020 with the help of Google Forms via the Facebook. The study involved 1,005 people (203 men and 802 women, age 18-76 years). The number of confirmed cases in Ukraine during this time increased from 1,072 to 10,406 people, deaths did from 22 to 261. During the research, the country was in quarantine, announced on March 11 by the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. On March 25 it was transferred to the state of emergency until April 24, and then extended until May 22. Mass events were prohibited, educational institutions were closed, it wasn’t allowed to be in public places without masks, people over 60 were in self-isolation; the work of public catering, shopping and entertainment complexes, most shops was prohibited, air, rail and bus passenger services were stopped. Quarantine April exceeded all the most unexpected forecasts.

A special questionnaire was developed for the study. The questionnaire was consisted of seven parts: 1) attitudes to information in the context of epidemic, 2) cognitive beliefs about COVID-19, 3) experience of threat, 4) adhering to preventive behaviour, 5) attitudes to quarantine measures, 6) the features of routine behaviour in quarantine, 7) vision of the future. The used methods were: TIPI S. Gosling (Ukrainian-language version TIPI-UKR (Klimanska & Haletska, 2019), the questionnaire on positive and negative affects (OPANA) (Klimanska & Haletska, 2020), Brief COPE (Carver, 1997).

It was found that all respondents, regardless of age, were very interested in information about various aspects of the epidemic. Only 20,9% of the respondents showed a high level of information avoidance in order to reduce negative feelings. Among the cognitive beliefs about the virus were popular (26,57%) assumptions about its artificial origin, which was combined (r = 0,67, p≤0,001) with the belief that the coronavirus epidemic has been created for economic and political rearrangement of the world (26,27%).

There was a middle level of fear being infected in all age groups. Polar age groups felt less vulnerable (the youngest and the oldest), persons aged 51-60 felt the most vulnerable. Women were more afraid and worried about being infected.

The respondents demonstrated a high level of support for quarantine measures and a belief that it's adhering would help stop the epidemic. Approval of strict quarantine measures and belief in their effectiveness was most characteristic for people under the age of 20 years and in the age 51-60 years, the lowest level of both indicators was found at the age of 31-50 years.

More than 35% of the respondents said that during quarantine they paid attention to those activities for which there had been no time before: to a greater extent it was typical for young people - more than 50% of the respondents. At the same time, 15,22% of people, regardless of age, experienced a great lack of time; 19,9% of the respondents confirmed bulk buying of products and goods.  More than 20% of the respondents said that quarantine helped to get their families together, while 5,87% said that conflicts become more often and relations worsened.

The level of risk assessment of economic (73,83%) and political problems (56,71%) in Ukraine was very high and these indicators were strongly correlated (r = 0,57, p≤0,001). Older people showed the highest risk assessment of economic and political threats.

The respondents mostly were adhering to precautions. The most typical behaviour included hand washing and active use of hand sanitizers, regardless of age: 77,41% of the respondents did it constantly. Wearing masks was less popular: 53% of people in the age 31-50 wore a mask almost always, while 23% did so very rarely. Adherence to preventive behaviour was directly related to the recognition of its usefulness information tracking, support of quarantine measures and high assessment of the coronavirus threat. At the same time, there was negative relationship between preventive behaviour and the belief in the artificial origin of the virus as a bio-weapon and the belief that the epidemic was a realization of the idea of ​​political and economic rearrangement of the world. Preventive behaviour directly correlated with the level of fear and anxiety about the coronavirus situation in general. Adherence to the norms of preventive behaviour was more typical for women.

Five types of preventive behaviour were identified with the help of K-means clustering. The representatives of these types had different psychological peculiarities:

  • Group with the highest adhering to preventive behaviour: people wear a mask and wash hands, use actively hand sanitizer (26,2%); they strongly believe in the artificial origin of coronavirus as a bio-weapon, support strict quarantine measures in Ukraine, trust information from the Internet and social networks. They show ambivalence: the highest rates of family cohesion vs tension in the family relations during quarantine; they feel most excited, inspired, full of energy, determined vs most distressed, guilty and feel negative affect in general; among coping strategies they demonstrate the highest level of positive reframing and personal growth, humour, planning and active coping vs self-distraction, denial and venting.
  • Active wearing of a mask but ignoring hand washing & using of hand sanitizer (18.4%): these people do not believe in the effectiveness of quarantine measures and concern highly about the economic consequences of quarantine for Ukraine, show higher energy, confidence, determination, attentiveness and openness to new experiences combined with lower nervousness and anxiety. This group underestimate the epidemic threat and have the illusion of personal invulnerability.
  • Active hand washing & using of hand sanitizer but ignoring wearing of a mask (17.3%): such people are characterized by the highest level of belief in the artificial origin of the coronavirus as a bio-weapon, the tendency to experience guilt, anger, nervousness and anxiety.
  • Ignoring the norms of preventive behaviour: the lowest levels of wearing a mask, washing hands and using of hand sanitizer (13.6%). The representatives of this group do not support strict quarantine measures in Ukraine, do not believe in their effectiveness and do not trust information from the Internet; they demonstrate the lowest estimates of the probability of being infected, feeling threatened, but also the lowest level of feeling excited; they have the highest rates of worrying because of limited contacts with family and friends during the epidemic. In this group, the dominant coping strategy is a strategy of problems avoiding, which indicates the underestimation and ignoring the dangers of coronavirus as a leading reason for ignoring the rules of preventive behaviour.

Balanced preventive behaviour: a mask is worn quite often and hands are washed and hand sanitizer are used always (24.5%). The representatives of this group show middle level for all characteristics, although there is a high level of anger and nervousness, combined with a high level of tension in relationships and conflicts in the family.


PDF 18-36 (Українська)


Haletska I., Klymanska L., Klimanska M., & Horoshenko M. (2020) Perezhyvannya ta povedinka studentskoyi molodi v umovax karantynu COVID-19: strax chy vnutrishnya motyvaciya determinuyut preventyvnu povedinku?. [Students’ emotional experience and behaviour during COVID-19 quarantine: does fear or intrinsic motivation determine preventive behaviour?] Psyhologichnyj chasopy, 6 (4), 35-52. doi.org/10.31108/1.2020.6.4. 4 [In Ukrainian]

Klimanska, М., & Haletska, І. (2019) Ukrayins’ka adaptaciya korotkogo p’yatyfaktornogo opytuvalnyka osobystosti TIPI (TIPI-UKR) [Ukrainian adaptation of the short five factor personality questionnaire TIPI (TIPI-UKR)]. Psyhologichnyj chasopys, 9 (5), 57-74. doi:10.31108/1.2019.5.9.4 [In Ukrainian]

Klimanska, М., & Haletska, І. (2020) Psyhometrychna harakterystyka opytuval’nyka pozytyvnogo ta negatyvnogo afektu (OPANA), rozroblenogo na osnovi metodyky PANAS [Psychometric properties of the positive and negative questionnaire (OPANA), based of PANAS]. Psyhologichnyj chasopys, 4 (6), 119-132. https://doi.org/10.31108/1.2020.6.4.10 [In Ukrainian]

Postanova Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrayiny №211 vid 11 bereznya 2020 roku «Pro zapobigannya poshyrennyu na terytoriyi Ukrayiny koronavirusu COVID-19» [Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine № 211, March, 11th, 2020 «On prevention of COVID-19 coronavirus spread in Ukraine»]. Retrieved from: https://www.kmu.gov.ua/npas/pro-zapobigannya-poshim110320rennyu-na-teritoriyi-ukrayini-koronavirusu-covid-19 [In Ukrainian]

Brooks, S. K., Webster, R. K., Smith, L. E., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., Greenberg, N., & Rubin, G. J. (2020). The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet, 395 (2020), 912-920. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30460-8

Carver, C. S. (1997). You want to measure coping but your protocol's too long: сonsider the Brief COPE. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4, 92-100. doi:10.1207/s15327558ijbm0401_6

Chen, Q., Liang, M., Li, Y., Guo, J., Fei, D., Wang, L., et al. (2020). Mental health care for medical staff in China during the COVID-19 outbreak. Lancet Psychiatry, 7(4), e15-e16. doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(20)30078-x

Gerhold, L. (2020). COVID-19: Risk perception and Coping strategies. Results from a survey in Germany. PsyArXiv, 25 Mar. doi: 10.31234/osf.io/xmpk4.

Hawryluck, L., Gold, W. L., Robinson, S., Pogorski, S., Galea, S., & Styra, R. (2004). SARS control and psychological effects of quarantine, Toronto, Canada. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 10(7). https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1007.030703

Liang, L., Ren, H., Cao, R. et al. (2020). The Effect of COVID-19 on Youth Mental Health. Psychiatr Q. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-020-09744-3

Mattioli, A. V., & Ballerini Puviani, M. (2020). Lifestyle at Time of COVID-19: How Could Quarantine Affect Cardiovascular Risk. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, 14 (3), 240-242. doi:10.1177/1559827620918808

Mazza C., Ricci E., Biondi S., Colasanti M., Ferracuti, S., Napoli, C., & Roma, P. (2020) A Nationwide Survey of Psychological Distress among Italian People during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17 (9), 3165 doi:10.3390/ijerph17093165

Mucci, F., Mucci, N., & Diolaiuti, F. (2020). Lockdown and isolation: psychological aspects of COVID-19 pandemic in the general population. Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 17 (2), 63-64. https://doi.org/10.36131/CN20200205

Polizzi, C., Lynn, S.J., & Perry, A. (2020). Stress and coping in the time of COVID-19: pathways to resilience and recovery. Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 17 (2), 59-62. https://doi.org/10.36131/CN20200204

Rajkumar, R. P. (2020). COVID-19 and mental health: A review of the existing literature. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 52, 102066. doi:10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102066

Riad A., Huang Y., Zheng L., & Elavsky S. (2020) COVID-19 induced anxiety and protective behaviors during COVID-19 outbreak: scale development and validation. medRxiv 2020.05.05.20050419. doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.05.20050419

Stanwell-Smith, R. (2019). Influenza pandemics – feared but also easily forgotten? Perspectives in Public Health, 139(5), 210–210. doi:10.1177/1757913919863717

Stanwell-Smith, R. (2020). Covid-19 and public health. Perspectives in Public Health, doi:10.1177/1757913920922012

Wang, Y., Zhao, X., Feng, Q., Liu, L., Yao, Y., & Shi, J. (2020). Psychological assistance during the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak in China. Journal of Health Psychology, 25 (6), 733-737. doi:10.1177/1359105320919177

Worldometer (2020). COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic. World / Countries/ Ukraine. Retrieved from: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/ukraine/

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright Notice

Articles in the Psychological Journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. For more detailed information, please, fallow the link - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/