PSYCHOMETRIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE ON POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE AFFECTS (OPANA), BASED ON THE PANAS SCALES
Maryna Klimanska
Ivan Franko National University in Lviv
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3047-2346
Inna Haletska
Ivan Franko National University in Lviv
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9319-2229
PDF 119-132 (Українська)

Keywords

measurement of emotions
positive affect
negative affect
PANAS
OPANA

How to Cite

Klimanska, M., & Haletska, I. (2020). PSYCHOMETRIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE ON POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE AFFECTS (OPANA), BASED ON THE PANAS SCALES. PSYCHOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 6(4), 119-132. https://doi.org/10.31108/1.2020.6.4.10

Abstract

The article aim is to describe the development and testing of the psychometric characteristics of OPANA (the Questionnaire on Positive and Negative Affects), based on the PANAS scales (Watson, Clark, and Tellegen, 1988).

The sample of 777 participants was involved in the development and approbation of the questionnaire (age 17-72, 300 men, 477 women). The differences between the survey’s results of men and women, as well as differences depending on the methods of data collection (paper-and-pencil or online) were presented. The high internal reliability of the questionnaire scales (Cronbach alpha for the “during the past few weeks” instruction was 0.89 for positive affect (PA) and 0.88 for negative affect (NA) was confirmed. The test-retest reliability (N = 103 participants) was r = 0.7 for PA and r = 0.48 for NA. The exploratory factor analysis was used to analyze the factor structure of the questionnaire: as a result, a three-factor structure of the questionnaire was determined. The confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the equivalence of the two-factor and three-factor models (the three-factor model fit indices were χ² / df = 2.94; RMSEA = 0.059; CFI = 0.94; TLI = 0.93; the two-factor model fit indices were χ² / df = 2.89; RMSEA = 0.058; CFI = 0.942; TLI = 0.93). Significant correlations of PA and NA scales with the scales of affect balance, satisfaction with life, dispositional optimism, psychological hardiness, as well as extraversion, openness to experience and emotional stability proved the construct validity of the questionnaire.

OPANA can be used as a reliable and valid psychodiagnostic tool. The proposed list of descriptors makes it possible to distinguish between positive and negative affects, to analyze them according to the temporal context of an evaluation, to conduct longitudinal studies and to track the dynamics of changes. Because the research was conducted with a large group of participants, most of whom were students and representatives of different social groups, the obtained results can be only a starting point for exploring the possibilities of applying the Questionnaire in Ukrainian psychological science. The method should be probated with groups of different ages and with specific groups, for example, alcohol and drug addicts, people with deviant or delinquent behaviour, in order to clarify the normative data for the questionnaire.

 

PDF 119-132 (Українська)

References

Klimanska, М., Haletska, І. (2019) Ukrayins’ka adaptaciya korotkogo p’yatyfaktornogo opytuvalnyka osobystosti TIPI (TIPI-UKR) [Ukrainian adaptation of the short five factor personality questionnaire TIPI (TIPI-UKR)] // Psyhologichnyj chasopys. № 9 (5). 57-74. doi:10.31108/1.2019.5.9.4 [In Ukrainian]

Beck, J. G., Novy, D. M., Diefenbach, G. J., Stanley, M. A., Averill, P. M., & Swann, A. C. (2003). Differentiating anxiety and depression in older adults with generalized anxiety disorder. Psychological Assessment, 15, 184–192. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.15.2.184

Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Сhicago: Aldine Publishing Company. Available at: https://www.norc.org/PDFs/publications/BradburnN_Struc_Psych_Well_Being.pdf

Crawford, J. R., & Henry, J. D. (2004). The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): Construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43(3), 245–265. doi:10.1348/0144665031752934

Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Oishi, S. (2005). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and life satisfaction. C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology, 63-73. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Fajkowska, M., & Marszał-Wiśniewska, M. (2009) Właściwości psychometryczne Skali Pozytywnego i Negatywnego Afektu–Wersja Rozszerzona (PANAS-X). Wstępne wyniki badań w polskiej próbie. Przegląd Psychologiczny, 52 (4), 355-388

Finch, H. W., Immekus, J. C., & French, B. F. (2016). Applied Psychometrics Using SPSS and AMOS. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing Inc.

Gaudreau, P., Sanchez, X., & Blondin, J.-P. (2006). Positive and negative affective states in a performance-related setting: Testing the factorial structure of the PANAS across two samples of French-Canadian participants. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22, 240–249. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.22.4.240

Leue, A., & Beauducel, A. (2011). The PANAS structure revisited: On the validity of a bifactor model in community and forensic samples. Psychological Assessment, 23, 215–225. doi:10.1037/a0021400

Masih J., & Verbeke W. (2019) Exploring Association of Opioid Receptor Genes Polymorphism with Positive and Negative Moods using Positive and Negative Affective States Scale (PANAS). Clinical and Experimental Psychology, 5:1. doi: 10.4172/2471-2701.1000209

Mehrabian, A. (1997). Comparison of the PAD and PANAS as models for describing emotions and for differentiating anxiety from depression. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 19, 331–357. doi:10.1007/BF02229025

Mihic, L., Novovic, Z., Colovic, P., & Smederevac, S. (2014). Serbian adaptation of the positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS): Its facets and second-order structure. Psihologija, 47(4), 393–414. doi:10.2298/psi1404393m

Schmukle, S. C., Egloff, B., & Burns, L. R. (2002). The relationship between positive and negative affect in the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(5), 463–475. doi:10.1016/s0092-6566(02)00007-7

Serafini, K., Malin-Mayor, B., Nich, C., Hunkele, K., & Carroll, K. M. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) in a heterogeneous sample of substance users. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 42(2), 203–212. doi:10.3109/00952990.2015.1133632

Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063

Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1994). The PANAS-X: Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule-expanded form. The University of Iowa. DOI: 10.17077/48vt-m4t2

Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.219

Watson, D., Wiese, D., Vaidya, J., & Tellegen, A. (1999). The two general activation systems of affect: Structural findings, evolutionary considerations, and psychobiological evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(5), 820–838. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.5.820

Zevon, M. A., & Tellegen, A. (1982). The structure of mood change: An idiographic/nomothetic analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(1), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.1.111

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright Notice

Articles in the Psychological Journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. For more detailed information, please, fallow the link - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/