Abstract
The article deals with the theoretical analysis and empirical research of psychological features of the phenomenon of communicative tolerance in the conditions of quarantine isolation.
Different understandings of the concept of tolerance / communicative tolerance and its structure by scientists in the scientific psychological literature are considered. It was found that most scientists, analyzing the meaning of the concept of "communicative tolerance", often describe it as: personal characteristic; attitude to another person and the corresponding behavior of a person in the communication process. And in the structure of communicative tolerance they more often distinguish cognitive, affective and behavioral components, or offer a list of qualities of a tolerant personality.
The understanding of communicative tolerance as a sophisticated complex holistic psychological phenomenon based on person’s communicative experience, their morality, inner culture and upbringing, as well as on the development of such personal traits as: benevolence, politeness, sociability, empathy, courtesy, moderation, on tendency to solve existing problems through cooperation, agreements and taking into account the interests of both sides of the communication – is generalized.
It is stated that in the attempts of modern scientists to understand and explain the concept of tolerance in communication, we can distinguish two main approaches: linguistic and psychological, – which are partially opposed to each other. The first is by emphasizing that "communicative tolerance" is purely communicative category because it manifests itself in communication, and the second is by arguing that communicative tolerance is a complex and multifaceted mental phenomenon. It is noted that in the word combination "communicative tolerance" the concept of "communicative" – is just an attribute of the main word – "tolerance", emphasizing its psychological understanding.
Peculiarities of development and manifestation of communicative tolerance in first- and second-year students, future psychologists, for whom it is a professionally important quality, was studied. It was found that respondents mainly tend to show the competent position in communication and to comprehensive accept other people, but the degree of their tolerance in communication was insufficient, because they could not hide their own negative emotions and communicative experience; may show indisputability, aggression or cruelty to the interlocutor; aspire to change him by fiting to their own image; didn’t want to get closer to another person on an emotional basis for the sake of effective communication.
The correlations between the indicators of the techniques of diagnostics of communicative tolerance and other methods, the existence of which confirms the sophisticated, complexity and multifaceted nature of the phenomenon of communicative tolerance; factors that discover the hidden behind the correlation of the reasons for intolerance of respondents in communication and the ineffectiveness of its results are analyzed.
It is concluded that tolerant communication is based on the conscious acceptance of another person's individuality; the desire to listen, to understand her, without suppressing the freedom of her expression and without aspire to change in her own way; the wish to communicate sincerely and openly, showing kindness and respect to human dignity and restrain possible negative feelings; on the desire to cooperate in order to avoid conflicts and achieve successful, effective and efficient communication.
References
Ageeva, Z. A. (2012). Kommunikativnaja tolerantnost' kak jelement kommunikativnoj kompetentnosti lichnosti [Communicative tolerance as an element of communicative competence of the person]. Vestnik IGU. Serija: estestvennye, obshhestvennye nauki, 1, 49–53 [in Russian].
Bacevych, F. (2010). Lingvokul'turni aspekty komunikatyvnoi' tolerantnosti [Linguistic and cultural aspects of communicative tolerance]. Sociogumanitarni problemy ljudyny. Filosofs'ko-kul'turologichni problemy movy i komunikacii', 5, 108–119 [in Ukrainian].
Bojko, V. V. (2008). Psihojenergetika [Psychoenergetics]. Sankt Peterburg : Piter [in Russian].
Chaplak, Ja. V., Proskurnjak, O. P., & Chujko, G. V. (2020). Komunikatyvna tolerantnist' jak psyhologichna problema [Communicative tolerance as the psychological problem]. Psyhologichnyj chasopys, 3, Vol.6, 33–44. DOI: 10.31108/1.2020.6.3.3 [in Ukrainian]
Chujko G. V., Chaplak Ja. V. (2020). Tolerantnist' u zhytti ljudyny i suspil'stva [Tolerance in the life of human and society]. Psyhologichnyj zhurnal, issue 2, Vol. 6, 29–42. DOI: 10.31108/1.2020.6.2.3 [in Ukrainian].
Deklaracija pryncypiv tolerantnosti (1995). Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_503 (data zvernennja 25.01.2020). [in Ukrainian]
Derkach, L. M., Marchenko, O. G. (2018). Psyhologija kar’jery ta profesijna komunikatyvna tolerantnist' v ukrai'ns'komu konteksti [Career psychology and professional communicative tolerance in the Ukrainian context]. Mizhnarodnyj naukovyj visnyk, 1(17), 21–33. DOI: 10.24144/2218-5348.2018.1(17).21-3 [in Ukrainian]
Diagnostika prinjatija drugih, V. Fej (n. d.) [Diagnostics of acceptance of others, V. Fey]. Retrieved from: https://psycabi.net/testy/455-diagnostika-prinyatiya-drugikh-v-fej-metodiki-i-testy-dlya-shkolnikov [in Russian].
Enina, L. (2000). Rechevaja agressija i rechevaja tolerantnost' v sredstvah massovoj informacii [Speech aggression and speech tolerance in the media]. Retrieved from: http://www.tolerance.ru/RP-rech-agress.php?PrPage=MKO [in Russian].
Esipov, M. A. (2017). Soderzhanie i struktura fenomena kommunikativnoj tolerantnosti v otechestvennyh psihologo-pedagogicheskih issledovanijah [Content and structure of the phenomenon of communicative tolerance in Russian psychological and pedagogical research]. Mir nauki, 6, Vol. 5. Retrieved from: https://mir-nauki.com/PDF/22PDMN617.pdf [in Russian].
Gladush, G. V. (2011). Formuvannja tolerantnosti jak osnovy pozytyvnyh mizhosobystisnyh stosunkiv u pidlitkovomu vici [Formation of tolerance as a basis for positive interpersonal relationships in adolescence]. Problemy suchasnoi' psyhologii', Vol.12, 241–249. DOI: 10.32626/2227-6246.2011-12.%p. [in Ukrainian]
Grajs, G. P. (1975). Logika i rechevoe obshhenie [Logic and speech communication]. Retrieved from: http://kant.narod.ru/grice.htm [in Russian].
Gusev, A. I. (2011). Tolerantnost' k neopredelennosti kak sostavljajushhaja lichnostnogo potenciala. Tolerance to uncertainty as a component of personal potential. In D. A. Leont'ev (Ed.), Lichnostnyj potencial: struktura i diagnostika (pp. 300–329). Moskva: Smysl [in Russian].
Hil'ko, S. O. (2017). Psyhologichni koreljaty formuvannja tolerantnosti do nevyznachenosti u majbutnih psyhologiv [Psychological correlates of formation of future psychologists’ ambiguity tolerance]. Problemy suchasnoi' psyhologii', 38, 421–437. DOI: 10.32626/2227-6246.2017-38.%p [in Ukrainian]
Jalans'ka, S. P. (2016). Psyhologichni aspekty rozvytku tolerantnosti osobystosti v osvitn'omu seredovyshhi [Psychological aspects of the development of individual tolerance in the educational environment]. Psyhologija osobystosti, 1, Vol. 7, 100–109. DOI: 10.15330/ps.7.1.100-108. [in Ukrainian]
Kapustina, N. G. (2008). Tolerantnost' kak vnutrennij resurs lichnosti [Tolerance as an internal resource of the individual]. Sibirskij psihologicheskij zhurnal, 30, 64–69. [in Russian]
Kas'janova, E. I. (2009). Nravstvennye osnovy tolerantnosti v sovremennoj sociokul'turnoj situacii [Moral foundations of tolerance in the modern socio-cultural situation]. Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis. Sankt-Peterburg: SPGU [in Russian].
Kasmirli, M. (2018). Conversational Implicature: What We Say vs. What We Mean. Retrieved from: https://brewminate.com/conversational-implicature-what-we-say-vs-what-we-mean/
Kolot, S. A. (2017). Tolerantnost' i psihologicheskaja bezopasnost' lichnosti [Tolerance and psychological safety of personality[. Science and Education a New Dimension. Pedagogy and Psychology, 135, Vol. 60, 69–71. [in Russian]
Kravcov, G. G., & Nuri, T. (2010). Psihologicheskoe soderzhanie ponjatija tolerantnosti [Psychological content of the concept of tolerance]. Vestnik RGGU. Serija “Psihologija. Pedagogika. Obrazovanie”, 17(60), 23–35. [in Russian]
Levchenko, E. G. (2006). Psihologicheskie uslovija razvitija tolerantnogo povedenija uchitelja [Psychological conditions for the development of tolerant behavior of teacher]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Krasnojarsk: SibGTU. [in Russian]
Lytvyn, S. V. (2019). Tolerantnist' do nevyznachenosti jav psyhologichnyj konstrukt [Tolerance to uncertainty is a psychological construct]. Psyhologichnyj chasopys, 1(21), 90–107. DOI: 10.31108/1.2019.1.21.6 [in Ukrainian]
McLain, D. L., Kefallonitis E. & Armani K. (2015). Ambiguity tolerance in organizations: definitional clarification and perspectives on future research. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 344. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00344.
Metodika diagnostiki «pomeh» v ustanovlenii jemocional'nyh kontaktov V. V. Bojko / Diagnostika jemocional'nyh bar'erov v mezhlichnostnom obshhenii (V. V.Bojko) (n. d.). [Technique of diagnostics of "interference" in establishing emotional contacts V. V. Boyko. / Diagnostics of emotional barriers in interpersonal communication (V. V. Boyko)]. Retrieved from: https://psycabi.net/testy/278-metodika-diagnostiki-pomekh-v-ustanovlenii-emotsionalnykh-kontaktov-diagnostika-emotsionalnykh-barerov-v-mezhlichnostnom-obshchenii-v-v-bojko [in Russian].
Mogilevich, B. R. (2016). Diskurs kommunikativnoj tolerantnosti [Discourse of communicative tolerance]. Vestnik MGU. Ser. 18. Sociologija i politologija, 3, 192–201. DOI: 10.24290/1029-3736-2016-22-3-192-201 [in Russian].
Olport, G. U. (2011). Tolerantnaja lichnost'. [Tolerant personality]. Nacional'nyj psihologicheskij zhurnal, 2, 155–159 [in Russian].
Opredelenie destruktivnyh ustanovok v mezhlichnostnyh otnoshenijah (V. V.Bojko) (n. d.). [Definition of destructive attitudes in interpersonal relationships (V. V. Boyko)]. Retrieved from: http://www.gurutestov.ru/test/212/ [in Russian].
Oprosnik kommunikativnoj tolerantnosti V. V. Bojko (Test Bojko) (n. d.) [The questionnaire of communicative tolerance of V. V. Boiko (Boiko Test)]. Retrieved from: https://psycabi.net/testy/83-test-kommunikativnoj-tolerantnosti-v-v-bojko [in Russian].
Oshibki v obshhenii. Test kommunikativnyh umenij L. Mihel'sona (n. d.). [Communication errors. L. Michelson's test of communication skills]. Retrieved from: https://psycabi.net/testy/86-oshibki-v-obshchenii-test-kommunikativnykh-umenij [in Russian].
Pal'ko, I. M. (2014). Tolerantnist' [Tolerance]. Retrieved from: http://eprints.zu.edu.ua/23739/1/%D0%9F%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BA%D0%BE_%D0%86.PDF [in Ukrainian].
Panasenko, E. (2019). Formuvannja komunikatyvnoi' tolerantnosti u majbutnih praktychnyh psyhologiv: teoretyko-prykladnyj aspekt [Development of future practical psychologist’s communicative tolerance: theoretical and applied aspect]. Profesionalizm pedagoga: teoretychni j metodychni aspekty, 10, 127–140. DOI: 10.31865/2414-9292.10.2019.182169. [in Ukrainian]
Pochebut, L. G. (2005). Vzaimoponimanie kul'tur : Metodologija i metody jetnicheskoj i kross-kul'turnoj psihologii. Psihologija mezhjetnicheskoj tolerantnosti [Mutual understanding of cultures: Methodology and methods of ethnic and cross-cultural psychology. Psychology of interethnic tolerance]. Sankt Peterburg : SPbU. [in Russian]
Rivchachenko, O. A. (2018). Psyhologichne zabezpechennja formuvannja komunikatyvnoi' tolerantnosti v pracivnykiv Nacional'noi' policii' Ukrai'ny. [Psychological support in forming communicative tolerance of the Ukraine National police officers]. Jurydychna psyhologija, 2, Vol. 23, 136–144. Retrieved from: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/urpp_2018_2_13. [in Ukrainian]
Seljutin, A. A. (2009). Kommunikativnaja tolerantnost' v virtual'nom prostranstve : na primere analiza tekstov social'nyh sajtov [Communicative tolerance in the virtual space: on the example of analysis of texts of social sites]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Cheljabinsk: ChGU [in Russian].
Shamsutdinova, E. Ju. (2006). Tolerantnost' kak kommunikativnaja kategorija (lingvisticheskij i lingvodidakticheskii aspekt) [Tolerance as a communicative category (linguistic and linguodidactic aspects)]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Moskva: GIRJa im. A.S. Pushkina [in Russian].
Shapovalova, T. A. (2012). Social'nyj i kommunikativnyj aspekty ponjatija «tolerantnost'» [Social and communicative aspects of the concept of “tolerance”]. Izvestija Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaja serija. Serija Filologija. Zhurnalistika, 12 (1), 64–67 [in Russian].
Skok, A. G. (2007). Social'no-psyhologichni umovy formuvannja komunikatyvnoi' tolerantnosti vykladacha vyshhogo navchal'nogo zakladu [Socio-psychological conditions of development of communicative tolerance in lecturers of institutions of higher education]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kyiv: Kostyuk Institute of Psychology, Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
Skripkina, T. P. (2009). Doverie i toleratnost'. Sushhestvujut li granicy? [Trust and tolerance. Are there boundaries?]. In G. U. Soldatova, T. Ju. Prokof'eva, T. A. Ljutaja (Eds). Mezhkul'turnyj dialog. Issledovanija i praktika (pp. 47–56). Moskva: Centr SMI MGU im. M. V. Lomonosova [in Russian].
Sternin, I. A., Shilihina, K. M. (2001). Kommunikativnye aspekty tolerantnosti [Communicative aspects of tolerance]. Voronezh : Istoki [in Russian].
Sukacheva, A. V., & Maslova, T. M. (2017). Kommunikativnaja tolerantnost': teoreticheskij i prakticheskij aspekty [Communicative tolerance: theoretical and practical aspects]. Sovremennye nauchnye issledovanija i innovacii, 3. Retrieved from: http://web.snauka.ru/issues/2017/03/79178 [in Russian].
Tolerance (n. d.). APA Dictionary of Psychology. Retrieved from: https://dictionary.apa.org/tolerance
Tolerantnist' (2002). Shynkaruk, V. I. (Ed.). Filosofs'kyj encyklopedychnyj slovnyk [Philosophical encyclopedic dictionary]. Kyi'v : Abrys, 642. [in Ukrainian]
Zinchenko, A. V. (2018). Sutnist' fenomena «komunikatyvna tolerantnist'» u psyhologo-pedagogichnij literaturi [The essence of the phenomenon of "communicative tolerance" in psychological and pedagogical literature]. Visnyk Cherkas'kogo universytetu. Serija Pedagogichni nauky, 8, 73–78. Retrieved from: http://ped-ejournal.cdu.edu.ua/article/view/2756/2917 [in Ukrainian].

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2022 Halyna Chuyko, Yan Chaplak, Mariya Komisaryk
