The article analyzes the complex interaction of the abstract and specific in L.S.Vygotsky’s works. The specific is analyzed as a unity in diversity, as a complex, contradictory, heterogeneous and nonlinear-logic unity. We have proven that L.S.Vygotsky, searching for such content-rich specific that can be a «cell» in psychology, implemented actually the idea of systematicity in psychology. The advantages of «unit analysis» are explicated in view of the fact that a “unit” (unlike an “element”) includes the most simple as well as learnable form of everything that in its “unfolded” state (mentally, on the basis of accumulated scientific facts) allows getting truly specific knowledge. The general way of cognition is pointed out: a philosophical and methodological idea about an object (abstract) - contemplation - analysis – finding of specific-universal - practice - new methodology etc. – the spiral of cognition. A task (supertask) of L.S.Vygotsky’s cultural and historical theory was to build (to unfold) the specific human psychology as a modus (“unit”) of substance. Methodological principles of monism, indeterminism and systematicity are described as fundamental ones in psychology. L.S.Vygotsky’s works highlight Spinoza’s understanding of eternal development, so the concept of development becomes even not a principle but the fabric of a study subject in Vygotsky’s theory. The inner unity of psychology is explained as the most complex relationship of biological and psychical attributes and connections within the psychological domain. Inter-functional psychological systems include not only components of higher mental functions but also natural, biological and cultural ones, namely everything that is covered by “a human being’s psychological life” as a concept. There are many systems, but they are interconnected, forms semantic dynamic systems after emergence of conceptual thinking. We should mention that relations embrace all human personality, they are constantly changes as for their essence and they are the main key to understanding of a human being. “Affect – intellect” antinomy is understood in the sense that all the phenomena from both conscious and unconscious domains, being actualized into an event.
Freud, Z. (2000). Tolkovanie snovidenij: Sb. proizvedenij [The Interpreting of Dreams: Collected Works]. Moskva, Rossija: JeKSMO-Press. 608 s. [in Russian].
Gete, G. (1997). Sobranie sochinenij [Collected works]. Moskva, Rossija. 337 s.
Il'enkov, Je.V. (2019). Dialektika abstraktnogo i konkretnogo v nauchno-teoreticheskom myshlenii [The dialectics of abstract and specific in scientific-theoretical thinking]. Il'enkov Je.V. Sobranie sochinenij. Т. 1. [Collected works. Vol. 1]. Moskva, Rossija: Kanon+. Pp. 23-353. [in Russian].
Il'enkov, Je.V. (2020a). Voobrazhenie [Imagination]. Il'enkov Je.V. Sobranie sochinenij. Т. 3. [Collected works. Vol. 3]. Moskva, Rossija: Kanon+. Pp. 185-206. [in Russian].
Il'enkov, Je.V. (2020b). Ob esteticheskoj prirode fantasii [On aesthetic nature of imagination]. Il'enkov Je.V. Sobranie sochinenij. Т. 3. [Collected works. Vol. 3]. Moskva, Rossija: Kanon+. Pp. 84-135. [in Russian].
Jung, K. G. (1996). Problemy dushi nashego vremeni [The problems of soul in our times]. M.: Izdatel'skaja gruppa „Progress”. 331 s. [in Russian].
L.S.Vygotskij: nachalo puti: Vospominanija S.F.Dobkina o L've Vygotskom [Publikacija, redakcija, predislovie i kommentarii I.M.Fejgenberga]; Rannie stat'i L.S.Vygotskogo (1996) [L.S.Vygotsky: the way hе started: S.F.Dobkin’s Memoirs [Prepared publication, edited and annotated by I.M.Feingenberg]; L.S.Vygotsky’s early essays]. Jerusalem, Israel: Jerusalem Publishing Centre, 1996. 108 p. [in Russian].
Losev, A.F. (1991). Dialektika mifa [The dialectics of myth]. Losev A.F. Filosofija. Mifologija. Kul'tura [Philosophy. Mythology. Culture]. Moskva, Rossija: Politizdat. Pp. 21-186. [in Russian].
Rodzhers, K. R. (1994). Vzgljad na psihoterapiju. Stanovlenie cheloveka [The perspective towards psychotherapy. On becoming a person]. Moskva: Izdatel'skaja gruppa “Progress”, “Univers”. 480 s. [in Russian].
Spinoza, B. (2019). Jetika [Ethics]. Sankt-Peterburg, Rossija: Azbuka, Azbuka-Attikus. 336 s. [in Russian].
Svas'jan, K.A. (1989). Iogann Vol'fgang Gete [Johann Wolfgang von Goethe]. Moskva, Rossija: Mysl'. 186 s. [in Russian].
Vygotskij, L.S. (1982). Sobranie sochinenij: v 6 t. T. 1. [Collected works: in 6 vol. Vol. 1]. Moskva, Rossija: Pedagogika. 488 p. [in Russian].
Vygotskij, L.S. (1983). Sobranie sochinenij: v 6 t. T. 5. [Collected works: in 6 vol. Vol. 5]. Moskva, Rossija: Pedagogika. 368 p. [in Russian].
Vygotskij, L.S. (2001). Igra i ee rol' v psihicheskom razvitii rebenka [The game and its role in the psychological development of a child]. Psihologija razvitija [Developmental psychology]. Sankt-Peterburg, Rossija: Piter. S. 56-79.
Vygotskij, L.S. (2015). Tragedija o Gamlete, prince Datskom, V. Shekspira [W.Shakespeare’s Tragedy about Hamlet, Prince of Denmarke]. Vygotskij L.S. Polnoe sobranie sochinenij: v 16 t. T. 1. [Complete collected works in 16 vol., Vol. 1]. Moskva, Rossija: Lev'. S. 77-306. [in Russian].
Vygotsky, L.S. (1987). Psihologija iskusstva [The psychology of art]. Moscow: Pedagogika. [in Russian].
Zapisnye knizhki L.S. Vygotskogo. Izbrannoe [L.S. Vygotsky’s notebooks. Selected works] (2017). Pod. obshhej redakciej E. Zavershnevoj i R. Van der Veera. [Edited by E. Zaverszneva, R. Van der Veer]. M.: Kanon. [in Russian].
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles in the Psychological Journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. For more detailed information, please, fallow the link - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/