PDF 80-90 (Українська)


regulatory functions
cultural congruence
cultural rules
gender specificity
preschool age
normative situation

How to Cite



Methodology. The development of a child’s self-regulation at preschool age is conditioned by the peculiarities of a cultural situation, which is represented by a set of invariant normative rules. Mastering the invariant cultural rules is understood as shaping the child’s cultural congruence and reflects the child’s development as an agent of his/her culture. To investigate the cognitive aspect of self-regulation, A. Miyake’s model of the “regulatory functions” was used. Within this model three interrelated and simultaneously independent factors were determined: working memory, the ability to shift attention and constraint control.

The study purpose was to find out how the assimilation of the cultural rules of a “normative situation” (N. E. Veraksa) influenced the regulatory functions of preschool age children of different genders.

Methods and research scheme. 113 children of 5–6 years old (58 boys and 55 girls) who attended the senior groups of the nursery schools of Sloviansk, Donetsk region and Pereiaslav,  Kyiv region and 113 mothers (from 24 to 44 years old) participated in the study. Cultural congruence was assessed using the questionnaire for parents that contained the invariant rules for children of 5–6 years old and allowed assessing the extent to which their children could comply with these rules. The regulatory functions was examined using the set of techniques which included the subscales of the testing battery NEPSY-II (Korkman et al., 2007) and the technique DCCS (Zelazo, 2006).

Results. The verbal memory of the boys with higher cultural congruence was developed better, and the boys with the low congruency were able to shift their attention better from one task to another and better retain visual images. As for the girls, the development of their regulatory functions did not depend on their cultural congruence.

Conclusions. The data obtained indicate the gender specificity of the influence of cultural congruence on the children’s regulatory functions, which makes it possible to refine and compare the results with other studies.
PDF 80-90 (Українська)


Almazova, O. V., Bukhalenkova, D. A., & Veraksa, A. N. (2016). Proizvolnost v doshkolnom vozraste: sravnitelnyi analiz razlichnykh podkhodov i diagnosticheskogo instrumentariia [Arbitrariness at preschool age: a comparative analysis of various approaches and diagnostic tools]. Natcionalnyi psikhologicheskii zhurnal – National Psychological Journal, 4(24), 14–22. DOI: 10.11621/ npj.2016.0402 [in Russian].

Baianova, L. F. (2017). Psikhologiia doshkolnika v normativnoi situatcii [Psychology of the preschooler in the normative situation]. Kazan: Izdatelstvo Kazanskogo universiteta [in Russian].

Baianova, L. F., & Mustafin, T. R. (2015). Metodika issledovaniia sootvetstviia doshkolnika pravilam normativnoi situatcii [Technique for studying the compliance of a preschooler with the rules of the normative situation]. Filologiia i kultura – Philology and Culture, 3(41), 325–332 [in Russian].

Baianova, L. F., Shishova, E. O., & Rezazadekh, Z. (2015). Individualno-psikhologicheskie osobennosti mladshikh shkolnikov pri raznom urovne kulturnoi kongruentnosti [Individual-psychological characteristics of junior schoolchildren at different levels of cultural congruence]. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniia – Modern Problems of Science and Education, 2, 701 [in Russian].

Bern, Sh. (2004). Gendernaia psikhologiia [Gender psychology]. Moskva: Praim-Evroznak [in Russian].

Veraksa, A. N. (2014). Sotcialnyi aspekt v razvitii reguliatornykh funktcii v detskom vozraste: obzor sovremennykh zarubezhnykh issledovanii [Social aspect in the development of regulatory functions in childhood: review of modern foreign studies]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriia 14. Psikhologiia – Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 14. Psychology, 4, 91–101 [in Russian].

Veraksa, A. N. (2015). Razvitie reguliatornykh funktcii doshkolnikov v obrazovatelnom protcesse [Development of preschoolers’ regulatory functions in the educational process]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriia 14. Psikhologiia – Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 14. Psychology, 3, 65–73 [in Russian].

Veraksa, N. E. (2000). Lichnost i kultura: strukturno-dialekticheskii podkhod [Personality and culture: structural-dialectical approach]. Peremeny – Changes, 1, 81–107 [in Russian].

Zaporozhets, A. V. (1986). Razvitie proizvolnykh dvizhenii [Development of voluntary movements]. Izbrannye psikhologicheskie trudy – Selected psychological works (Vol. 2). Moskva: Pedagogika [in Russian].

Zaporozhets, A. V. (1986). Razvitie emotcionalnoi reguliatcii deistvii u rebenka [Development of emotional regulation of the child’s actions]. Izbrannye psikhologicheskie trudy – Selected psychological works (Vol. 1). Moskva: Pedagogika [in Russian].

Leontev, A. N. (2004). Deiatelnost, soznanie, lichnost [Activity, consciousness, personality]. Moskva: Smysl; Akademiia [in Russian].

Lisina, M. I. (1957). O nekotorykh usloviiakh prevrashcheniia reaktcii iz neproizvolnykh v proizvolnye [On some conditions for transforming reactions from involuntary to arbitrary]. Doklady APN RSFSR – Reports of APS of RSFSR, 1, 85–87 [in Russian].

Luriia, A. R. (1957). Rol rechi v formirovanii proizvolnogo dvizheniia [Role of speech in forming the arbitrary movement]. Materialy soveshchaniia po psikhologii – Materials of the Meeting on Psychology, 327–337. Moskva: APN RSFSR [in Russian].

Luriia, A. R. (1969). Soznatelnoe deistvie, ego proiskhozhdenie i mozgovaia organizatciia [Conscious action, its origin and brain organization]. Voprosy psikhologii – Psychology Issues, 5, 13–29 [in Russian].

Melnikova, N. V. (2009). Razvitie nravstvennoi sfery lichnosti doshkolnika [Development of the moral sphere of the preschooler’s personality]. Extended abstract of Candidate’s thesis. Kazan [in Russian].

Otvechalina, O. B. (2005). Osobennosti gendernykh predstavlenii vospitatelnitc doshkolnykh obrazovatelnykh uchrezhdenii [Peculiarities of gender representations of educators of preschool educational institutions]. Candidate’s thesis. Moskva [in Russian].

Rubinshtein, S. L. (1999). Osnovy obshchei psikhologii [Fundamentals of general psychology]. Sankt-Peterburg: PiterKom [in Russian].

Semenova, L. E. (2010). Stanovlenie rebenka kak gendernogo subekta v protcesse lichnostnogo razvitiia v starshem doshkolnom i mladshem shkolnom vozraste v usloviiakh onto- i dizontogeneza [Formation of the child as a gender subject in the process of personal development at senior preschool and junior school age in the context of ontogenesis and dysontogenesis]. Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis. Nizhnii Novgorod [in Russian].

Smirnova, E. O. (1998). Razvitie voli i proizvolnosti v rannem i doshkolnom vozrastakh [Development of will and arbitrariness at early and preschool ages]. Moskva: Izdatelstvo Instituta prakticheskoi psikhologii; Voronezh: NPO «MODEK» [in Russian].

Elkonin, D. B. (1965). Razvitie lichnosti rebenka-doshkolnika [Development of a child-preschooler’s personality]. Psikhologiia lichnosti i deiatelnosti doshkolnika [Psychology of personality and activity of the preschooler]. A. V. Zaporozhets, D. B. Elkonin (Eds.). (Pp. 254–293). Moskva: Prosveshchenie [in Russian].

Cantin, R. H., Gnaedinger, E. K., Gallaway, K. C., Hesson-McInnis, M. S., & Hund, A. M. (2016). Executive functioning predicts reading, mathematics, and theory of mind during the elementary years. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 146, 66–78.

Diamond, A. (2006). The early development of executive functions. In “Lifespan cognition: Mechanisms of change”. E. Bialystock, & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.). (Pp. 70–95). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Donenberg, G.R., & Hoffman, L. W. (1988). Gender Differences in Moral Development. Sex Roles 18–18, No.11–12, 7–17. DOI:10.1007/BF00288055

Garon, N. M., Piccinin, C. & Smith, I. M. (2015). Does the BRIEF-P Predict Specific Executive Function Components in Preschoolers? Applied Neuropsychology: Child, 10, 1–9, DOI: 10.1080/21622965.2014.1002923

Korkman, M. (1999). Applying Luria’s diagnostic principles in the neuropsychological assessment of children. Neuropsychology Review, 9(2), 89–105. DOI:10.1023/A:1025659808004

Korkman, M., Kirk, U., & Kemp, S. L. (2007). NEPSY II. Administrative manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

Lehto, J., Juujarvi, P., Kooistra, L., & Pulkkinen, L. (2003). Dimensions of executive functioning: evidence from children. The British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21, 59–80. DOI: 10.1348/026151003321164627

Matthews, J. S., Ponitz, C., & Morrison, F. J. (2009). Early gender differences in self-regulation and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 689-704. DOI: 10.1037/a0014240

Miyake, A., Friedman, N., Emerson, M., Witzki, A., & Howerter, A. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex ‘frontal lobe’ tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100. DOI: 10.1006=cogp.1999.0734

Norman, D., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action. In “Consciousness and self-regulation”. R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.). Advances in Research and Theory, 4, 1–18. New York, NY: Plenum.

Olson, S. L., & Kashiwagi, K. (2000). Teacher ratings of behavioral self-regulation in preschool children: A Japanese/U.S. comparison. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21(6), 609–617. DOI: 10.1016/S0193-3973(00)00056-3

Pennington, B. (1997). Dimensions of executive functions in normal and abnormal development. In “Development of the prefrontal cortex: evolution, neurobiology, and behavior”. N. Krasnegor, G. Lyon, & P. Goldman (Eds.). (Pp. 265–281). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Paul. H. Brooks.

Sobkin, V. S., Veraksa, A. N., Bukhalenkova, D. A., Fedotova, A. V., Khalutina, U. A., & Yakupova, V. A. (2016). The connection of socio-demographic factors and child-parent relationships to the psychological aspects of children’s development. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 9(4), 106–122.

Tyre, P. (2006). The trouble with boys. Newsweek Magazine. Retrieved from:

Visu-Petra, L., Cheie, L., Benga, O., & Miclea, M. (2012). The structure of executive functions in preschoolers: An investigation using the NEPSY battery. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 33, 627–631. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.197

Von Suchodoletz, A., Gestsdottir, S., Wanless, S. B., McClelland, M. M., Birgisdottir, F., Gunzenhauser, C., & Ragnarsdottir, H. (2013). Behavioral self-regulation and relations to emergent academic skills among children in Germany and Iceland. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28(1), 62–73. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2012.05.003

Welsh, M., Pennington, B., & Groisser, D. (1991). A normative developmental study of executive function: A window on prefrontal function in children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 7, 131–149. DOI: 10.1080=87565649109540483

Zelazo, P. D. (2006). The Dimensional Change Card Sort (DCCS): A method of assessing executive function in children. Nature Protocols, 1, 297–301. DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2006.46

Copyright Notice

Articles in the Psychological Journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. For more detailed information, please, fallow the link -