The study purpose was to analyze Francis Galton’s works in order to determine the methodology that should be used to study creativity and its heredity. The article author clarified the definitions of the following concepts: “ability”, “giftedness”, “talent” and also examined the relations between the theories on heredity and eugenics, formulated by Galton.
Via the performed theoretical analysis, we have found that Francis Galton, studying the heredity of talent, erroneously hypothesised that a high reputation was a true measure of high abilities. In his works, Galton did not use a single term to define “talent” or “giftedness”. Also, no explanation was given for criteria describing subjects as: “having high abilities” or “high reputation”. Also, Galton did not develop clear criteria determining whether certain relatives of famous people were also outstanding or talented.
Accordingly, the article author proposes her own approach defining an outstanding individual that excludes from consideration on creativity people who are famous, but, at the same time, are not highly talented.
Francis Galton did not explain exactly what abilities had people of different occupations; he was not able to describe specific signs of talent in a particular area. Galton divided talented individuals into classes, but the basis for such division did not meet any reasonable criterion. He also compared talents of students studied at different classes but did not explain rules determining talent levels.
Because of these and other facts, Francis Galton’ research results were unreliable. Omissions were also made in the study on talent heredity, which, in turn, led to incorrectly formulated goals for such an approach as “Eugenics”.
Bulmer, M. (1999). The Development of Francis Galton's Ideas on the Mechanism of Heredity. Journal of the History of Biology, 32(2), pp. 263-292. URL: http://www.jstor.org.vlib.interchange.at/stable/4331525
Burbridge., D. (2001). Francis Galton on Twins, Heredity and Social Class. The British Journal for the History of Science, 34(3), pp. 323-340. URL: http://www.jstor.org.vlib.interchange.at/stable/4028101
Cowan, R. (1972). Francis Galton's Contribution to Genetics. Journal of the History of Biology, 5(2), pp. 389-412. URL: http://www.jstor.org.vlib.interchange.at/stable/4330582
Fancher, R. (1983). Biographical Origins of Francis Galton's Psychology. Isis, 74(2), pp. 227-233. URL: http://www.jstor.org.vlib.interchange.at/stable/233104
Galton, D., & Galton, C. (1998). Francis Galton: And Eugenics Today. Journal of Medical Ethics, 24(2), pp. 99-105. URL: http://www.jstor.org.vlib.interchange.at/stable/27718075
Galton, F. (1875). Nasledstvennost’ talanta, yeye zakony i posledstviya. [Hereditary genius: an enquiry into its laws and consequences].S-Peterburg. [in Russian]
Galton, F. (1883). Inquiries into the human faculty and its development. London.
Galton, F. (1904). Eugenics: Its Definition, Scope and Aims. The Sociological Review, sp1(1), pp. 43-51. doi: 10.1177/0038026104sp100104
Galton, F. (1904). Index to achievements of near kinsfolk of some of the fellows of the Royal Society. London: R. Clay.
Galton, F. (1905). Studies in Eugenics. American Journal Of Sociology, 11(1), pp. 11-25. doi: 10.1086/211373
Hergenhahn, B.R. (1992). An Introduction to the History of Psychology. Wadsworth: Thomson Learning.
Jensen, A. (2006). Clocking the Mind: Mental Chronometry and Individual Differences. Elsevier Science. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780080449395/clocking-the-mind#book-info
Kenna, J. (1964). Sir Francis Galton's Contribution to Anthropology. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 94(2), pp. 80-93. doi:10.2307/2844375
Renwick, C. (2011). From political economy to sociology: Francis Galton and the social-scientific origins of eugenics. The British Journal for the History of Science, 44(3), pp. 343-369. URL: http://www.jstor.org.vlib.interchange.at/stable/41241682
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles in the Psychological Journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. For more detailed information, please, fallow the link - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/