The article analyses of the results the implemented program for designing of pedagogical workers’ individual educational trajectories. During the performed experiment we observed changes in pedagogical workers’ body-intellectual, dynamic-motivational structures and in their personal potential in both, control and experimental groups. The changes demonstrated by the program participants were more dynamic and corresponded better to the external, situational context, namely, the reformation of general secondary schools in accordance with the “New Ukrainian School” program, which is “hybrid” and contradictory as for its content and procedures. As for the control group, the external, “background” conditions were manifested at all studied levels (dynamic-motivational, personal, self-evaluative), with the exception of the body-intellectual one; as for the experimental group, these conditions were manifested at all levels without exception. The synchronized unidirectional statistically significant changes in the control and experimental groups were determined for the following indicators: increased introjected, external motivation, deeper meaningfulness of life. The formative influence of the program was manifested by the strengthened positive dynamics of those tendencies that were outlined in the control group (the better ability to represent the educational trajectory), as well as by other changes, in particular: the strengthened innovative component of the educational trajectory, the tendency to devalue the result-conscious and emotional-evaluative components of educational experiences; developed general abilities and motivation; a tangible increase in the potential for self-determination against the background of the decreased potential for realization, in general, and reflexivity, in particular. Such dynamics of a personal potential corresponds to the classical ideas about behavior in transitional conditions: criticism, rational mechanisms fade into the background, pedagogical workers tend to rely on more spontaneous reactions, listen to themselves, self-determine and generate their own meanings and trajectories, or listen to those who can help and have the appropriate experience, finally, since the previous models / trajectories lose their relevance, do not work, do not satisfy new conditions, new ones begin to be developed.
Artem'eva, E.Yu. (1999). Osnovy psihologii sub"ektivnoj semantiki [Fundamentals of the psychology of subjective semantics] I.B. Hanina (Ed.). Moskva: Nauka; Smysl [in Russian].
Bovyna, Y. B. (2006). Semantycheskyj dyfferencyal. Socyal'naja psyhologyja. [Semantic differential. Social psychology]. M.: Aspekt Press [in Russian].
Cukanov, B. Y. (2000). Vremja v psyhyke cheloveka [Time in the human psyche]. Odessa : Astroprynt, 220 [in Russian].
Kornylova, T. V. (2008). Modyfykacyja oprosnykov K. Dvek v kontekste yzuchenyja akademycheskyh dostyzhenyj studentov [Modification of questionnaires by K. Dweck in the context of the study of academic achievements of students] Psyhologycheskyj zhurnal, 3, 86–100 [in Russian]..
Kostjuk, G. S. (1989). Navchal'no-vyhovnyj proces i psyhichnyj rozvytok osobystosti [Educational process and mental development of personality]. Kyi'v [in Ukrainian].
Leontev, D. A. ed. (2011). Lichnostnyi potentsial: struktura i diagnostika [Personal Potential: Structure and Diagnostics]. Moskva: Smysl [in Russian].
Lushyn, P., Sukhenko, Ya., Davydova, O. (2020). Particularities of students’ educational trajectories and “projectories”: a psychosemantic dimension, 25th IEEE International Conference on Problems of Automated Tlectric Drive Theory and Practice. Kremenchuk, Ukraine.
Maksymenko, S. (2015). Teorija specyfichnyh rushii'v rozvytku G.S. Kostjuka [The theory of specific solutions developed by G.S. Kostyuk] Problemy suchasnoi' psyhologii', 27, 7–19. Retrieved from : http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Pspl_2015_27_3 [in Ukrainian].
Petrenko, V. F. (2005). Osnovy psihosemantiki [Basics of psychosemantics]. SPb.: Piter, 480 [in Russian].
Serkin, V. P. (2008). Metody psihologii sub#ektivnoj semantiki i psihosemantiki [Psychology methods of subjective semantics and psychosemantics]. M.: Izd-vo PChELA, 2008. 382 [in Russian].
Suhenko, Ja. V. (2018). Suhenko Ya. (2018). Semanticheskiy differentsial dlya otsenki obrazovatelnogo puti lichnosti [Semantic Differential for Evaluation of Educational Pathway of Personality]. Psiholingvistika , 24(1), 320–342 [in Ukrainian].
Suhenko, Ja. V. (2019). Indyvidual'ni osvitni trajektorii' pedagogichnyh pracivnykiv ta uchniv: systemnyj vymir fenomenu [Personal educational pathways of pedagogical workers and students: the systemic approach to the phenomenon]. Psyhologichnyj chasopys, 6 (5), 106–121. Retrieved from : https://doi.org/10.31108/1.2019.5.6.8 [in Ukrainian].
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles in the Psychological Journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. For more detailed information, please, fallow the link - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/