RESULTS OF APPROBATION OF THE TRAINING PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPING SELF-REGULATED STUDENT ACTIVITY IN THE PROCESS OF METACOGNITIVE MONITORING
Eduard Balashov
National University “Ostroh Academy”
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6486-0494
PDF 23-34 (Українська)

Keywords

self-regulated learning
individual-personal level
motivational-volitional level
cognitive level
metacognitive level
training program
students

How to Cite

Balashov, E. (2020). RESULTS OF APPROBATION OF THE TRAINING PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPING SELF-REGULATED STUDENT ACTIVITY IN THE PROCESS OF METACOGNITIVE MONITORING. PSYCHOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 6(4), 23-34. https://doi.org/10.31108/1.2020.6.4.2

Abstract

The article has been devoted to theoretical and methodological study of the issue of development of self-regulated student learning activity in the process of metacognitive monitoring, and empirical approbation of the own developed training program for increasing the efficiency of such learning activity. The purpose of our research was to justify the use and to develop the optimal training program for optimization of the process of metacognitive monitoring of student self-regulated learning through a forming impact on the indicators of self-regulation at individual-personal, motivational-volitional, cognitive and metacognitive levels. 

Approbation of the training program of student self-regulated learning and verification of its efficiency was conducted in three phases: 1) ascertaining (determining the reliability of metacognitive monitoring of self-regulated learning before the training); 2) forming (conducting the training program); 3) controlling (determination of the differences in reliability of metacognitive monitoring of self-regulated learning before and after the training program). The implementation of ascertaining phase combined a procedure of laboratory and natural experiments for identification of correlation between the components of the levels of self-regulated learning in the process of metacognitive monitoring, and for identification of the level of development of relevant individual-personal, motivational-volitional, cognitive and metacognitive levels characteristics of students. Forming experiment consisted in conduction of the training program for developing the components of student self-regulated learning at individual-personal, motivational-volitional, cognitive and metacognitive levels. The procedure of controlling phase was identical the one of the ascertaining phase. For determining the intergroup differences between the indicators of self-regulated learning in the process of metacognitive monitoring, we conducted the correlation analysis with the use of Student’s t-test and Fischer criterion.

The results of the forming experiment have allowed us to conclude that the efficiency level of student self-regulated learning in the process of metacognitive monitoring can be improved by the use the appropriate psychological and pedagogical conditions, ensuring the development of the relevant indicators at individual-personal, motivational-volitional, cognitive and metacognitive levels. The results of implementation of the special training program for improving the efficiency of student self-regulated learning based on the relevant author’s structural and functional models of student self-regulated activity have proved the significant changes in the experimental group in accordance to all the selected criteria.

 

PDF 23-34 (Українська)

References

Avhustiuk, M. (2018). Formation of Skills of Effective Metacognitive Monitoring of Student Learning Activity [Formuvannia navychok efektyvnoho metakohnityvnoho monitorynhu navchalnoji dijalnosti studentiv]. Scientific Bulletin of I. Mechnikov Odesa National University. Psychology. Vol. 23. #1(47). 6-12 [in Ukrainian].

Balashov, E. (2020). Characteristics of Diagnostic Complex of Studying Self-Regulation in Student Learning Activity [Kharakterystyka diahnostychnoho kompleksu vyvchennia samorehuliatsiji u navchalnij dijalnosti studentiv]. Bulletin of Kyiv Institute of Business and Technologies. #1(43). 5-12 [in Ukrainian].

Balashov, E., & Kalamazh, V. (2020). Diagnostics of Students’ Reflexive Abilities to Self-Regulation and their Reflexive Skills at the Cognivtive Level. Psychological Journal, 6(3), 18-32. https://doi.org/10.31108/1.2020.6.3.2 [in Ukrainian].

Kalamazh, V. (2019). Psychological Factors of Effectiveness of Group Project Activity of HEI Students in the Process of Learning Foreign Language [Psykholohichni chynnyky efektyvnosti hrupovoji proektnoji dijalnosti studentiv ZVO u protsesi vyvchennia inzemnoji movy]. Dissertation of Candidate of Psychological Sciences; 19.00.01. Lutsk [in Ukrainian].

Karamushka, L. (2005). Technologies of Work of Organizational Psychologists. Textbook for Students of HEI and Institutes of Post-Graduate Courses [Tehknolohiji roboty orhanizatsijnykh psykholohiv. Navchalnyj posibnyk dlia studentiv VNZ ta slukhachiv instytutiv pisliadyplomnoji osvity]. Kyiv: INKOS.

Morosanova, V., & Konoz, T. (2000). Style Regulation of a Person’s Behavior [Stilevaya samoreguliatsyya povedeniya cheloveka]. Issues of Psychology. #2. 118-127 [in Russian].

Sevin, E. & Fomin, F. (2013). Cognitive Psychology of Education: Classroom as a Laboratory [Kognitivnaya psikhologiya obrazobaniya: Auditoriya kak laboratoriya]. Psychology at HEI. #3. 67-83 [in Russian].

Savchenko, O. V. (2016). Reflexive competence: Methods and Procedures of Diagnostics [Refleksyvna kompetentnist: Metody i protsedury otsinky], Kherson: PP Vyshemyrskyi V.S. [in Ukrainian].

Carvalho de Filho M. K. (2009). Confidence judgments in real classroom settings: Monitoring performance in different types of tests. International Journal of Psychology, 44(2), 93-108.

Isaacson R. M., Fujita, F. (2006). Metacognitive knowledge monitoring and selfregulated learning: Academic success and reflections on learning. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(1), 39-55.

Miller T. M., Geraci, L. (2011). Unskilled but aware: Reinterpreting overconfidence in low-performing students. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Online First Publication, 1-5.

Nietfeld J. L., Cao, J. Osborne, W. (2005). Metacognitive monitoring accuracy and student performance in the postsecondary classroom. The Journal of Experimental Education, 74(1), 7-28.

Young A., Fry, J. D. (2008). Metacognitive awareness and academic achievement in college students. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8(2), 1-10.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright Notice

Articles in the Psychological Journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. For more detailed information, please, fallow the link - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/