THE ROLE OF AN INDIVIDUAL’S TEMPORAL PERSPECTIVE PECULIARITIES IN PROCRASTINATION PROPENSITY FORMATION
PDF 154-163 (Українська)

Keywords

procrastination
predictors of dilatory behaviour
time perspective

How to Cite

Zhuravleva, O. (2020). THE ROLE OF AN INDIVIDUAL’S TEMPORAL PERSPECTIVE PECULIARITIES IN PROCRASTINATION PROPENSITY FORMATION. PSYCHOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 6(3), 154–163. https://doi.org/10.31108/1.2020.6.3.15

Abstract

Because of the dynamism and rapid pace of social reality transformations, an individual should effectively manage his/her own time, which is a prerequisite for his/her success in various spheres of life. Therefore, the phenomenon of procrastination, that is, irrational postponement of important matters, which is a cause of many negative consequences, is increasingly in the focus of scholars. Trying to find the determinants of procrastination development, scientists focus on relationships of this concept with different individual human properties. Scientists often indicate the specificity of an individual’s time perspective as one of the important characteristics that may predispose his/her dilatory behaviour.

Therefore, the article purpose is to empirically study the relationship of features of an individual's time perspective with his/her propensity for procrastination.

The following methods were used as methods of investigation: the technique of procrastination diagnostics proposed by O. Zhuravlova and O. Zhuravlov; P. Steel’s Pure Procrastination Scale; F. Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory.

The sample consisted of 347 people from 18 to 47 year old. Among them, 20.7 % were men and 79.3 % were women. The most pronounced was the relationship between the general level of procrastination and the future temporal orientation (r = -0.389, p <0.01). This correlation was negative, which meant that the growth of one indicators was proportional to the decrease of the other.

The results of the empirical study indicated decreased expressiveness of the respondents’ future perspective (r = -0.389, p <0.01) with stronger negative past orientation (r = 0.264, p <0.01). This suggests that dilatory behaviour is based on traumatic experiences in situations when an individual's activities were evaluated.

O. Sennyk’ idea is interesting in the outlined context, according to which, in the case of an individual’s fixation on his/her own negative past experience, he/she develops a fatalistic orientation to the present. This hypothesis is confirmed by the results of empirical research, indicating a direct correlation (r = 0.273, p <0.01) between the scales of general procrastination and the present fatalistic attitude.

A close correlation was found out between the present hedonistic time perspective and the integral index of procrastination formation (r = 0.268, p <0.01).

The implemented regression analysis showed that the predictors of procrastination were orientation to the negative past (at p <0.05, β = 0.18), orientation to the hedonistic present (at p <0.05, β = 0.15) and temporal orientation to the future (at p <0.05, β = 0.38).

Thus, referring to the outlined patterns, we can say that the features of an individual’s temporal perspective are important for predicting an individual’s inclination to procrastination.

 

https://doi.org/10.31108/1.2020.6.3.15
PDF 154-163 (Українська)

References

Ainslie, G. & Haslam, N. (1992). Hyperbolic discounting. In G. Loewenstein & J. Elster (Eds.), Choice over time (pp. 57–92). Russell Sage Foundation.

Carelli, M. G. & Olsson, C.-J. (2015). Neural Correlates of Time Perspective. Time Perspective Theory; Review, Research and Application. Essays in Honor of Philip G. Zimbardo. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

Dementiy, L.I. & Karlovskaya, N.N. (2013). Osobennosti otvetstvennosti i vremennoy perspektivyi u studentov s raznyim urovnem prokrastinatsii [Specifics of responsibility and temporary challenges for students having various levels of procrastination]. Psihologiya obucheniya, 7, 4–19.

Gupta, R., Hershey, D. A. & Gaur, J. (2012). Time perspective and procrastination in the workplace: An empirical investigation. Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues, 31(2), 195–211.

Ji, L.-J., Guo, T., Zhang, Z. & Messervey D. (2009). Looking Into the Past: Cultural Differences in Perception and Representation of Past Information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(4), 761–769.

Kairys, A. (2010). Correlations between time perspectives and personality traits in different age groups. Bridges/Tiltai, 51(2), 159-172.

Kuzmina, O. V. (2013). Proyavlenie kompetentnosti vo vremeni u pedagogov v situatsiyah informatsionnyih peregruzok v usloviyah osvoeniya virtualnyih tehnologiy obucheniya [Demonstration of time competence of the teacher in situations of information overload in the process of virtual learning technologies development]. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii, 4, 98–102.

Maslach, C. & Goldberg, J. (1998). Prevention of burnout: New perspectives. Applied & Preventive Psychology, 7(1), 63–74.

Milgram, N. & Tenne, R. (2000). Personality correlates of decisional and task avoidant procrastination. European Journal of Personality, 14(2), 141–156.

Nyutten, Zh. (2004). Motivatsiya, deystvie i perspektiva buduschego [Motivation, action and future perspective]. Moskva: Smyisl.

Senyk O. M. (2016) Sotsialno-psykholohichni chynnyky uiavlen studentskoi molodi pro chasovu perspektyvu (dysertatsiya kandydata psykhologichnyh nauk). [Social and Psychological Factors of Students’ Views of their Time Perspective]. Instytut sotsialnoi ta politychnoi psykholohii NAPN Ukrainy, Kyiv.

Specter, M.H. & Ferrari, J.R. (2000). Time orientations of procrastinators: focusing on the past, present or future? Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 15(5), 197–202.

Syirtsova, A., Sokolova, E.T. & Mitina, O.V. (2007). Metodika F. Zimbardo po vremennoy perspective [The Phenomenon of Time Perspective across Different Cultures: Review of Researches Using ZTPI Scale]. Psihologicheskaya diagnostika, 1, 85–106.

Szpunar, K. K., Watson, J. M. & McDermott, K. B. (2007). Neural substrates of envisioning the future. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(2), 642–647.

Zhuravlova, O. & Zhuravlov, O. (2018). Rozrobka ta aprobatsiia metodyky diahnostyky osobystisnoho konstruktu prokrastynatsii [Development and approbation of the diagnostic methodology of the personal construction of prokrastination]. Visnyk KhDU. Seriia Psykholohichni nauky, 1(3), 42-46.

Zhuravlova, O. & Zhuravlov, O. (2019). Adaptatsiia ukrainomovnoi versii psykhodiahnostychnoi metodyky “Pure Procrastination Scale” [Adaptation of the Ukrainian version of the psychodiagnostics method “Pure Procrastination Scale”]. Teoriia i praktyka suchasnoi psykholohii, 1(2), 50-53.

Zimbardo, F. & Boyd, Dzh. (2010). Paradoks vremeni: novaya psihologiya vremeni, kotoraya uluchshit vashu zhizn [The paradox of time: a new psychology of time that will improve your life]. Moskva : Rech.

Zimbardo, P. G. & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting Time in Perspective: A Valid, Reliable Individual-Differences Metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271–1288.

Copyright Notice

Articles in the Psychological Journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. For more detailed information, please, fallow the link - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/