Keywords
corporate culture
psychological research on trust in organizations
psychological issues
psychological aspects of an organization’s effectiveness
trust as a factor of success
optimization of work
psychological means of work optimization
How to Cite
Abstract
The article presents the results of the theoretical and empirical study on the phenomena of trust and corporate culture. Based on the theoretical analysis and the study results, we concluded that trust, psychological atmosphere and organizational culture are not only significant factors in an enterprise’s economic efficiency, but also the main indicators of its psychological effectiveness. An organization’s psychological effectiveness is understood as its staff’s ability and willingness to perform their assigned tasks, including their willingness to make necessary or inevitable changes in the external and internal environment of the organization. Corporate culture and trust are integrative indicators of an organization’s psychological effectiveness, since, in addition to psychological relationships, they also include the regulatory system of decision-making and organizational behaviour.
References
Gerbert. D. (2006). Organizatsionnaya psikhologiya [Organizational psychology]. Kharkov. [in Russian]
Deynega І.O. (2013). Konkurentnі perevagi. yak skladova rinkovogo uspіkhu. Problemi formuvannya ta realіzatsії konkurentnoї polіtiki [Competitive advantages as a component of market success. Problems of formation and implementation of competition policy]. Materіali Mіzhnarodnoї naukovo-praktichnoї konferentsії. Lvіv : «Art-Druk». [in Ukrainian]
Zhuravlev A.L. (2004). Psikhologiya upravlencheskogo vzaimodeystviya (teoreticheskiye i prikladnyye problemy) [Psychology of managerial interaction (theoretical and applied problems)]. Moscow: Izd vo «Institut psikhologii RAN». [in Russian]
Zhuravlev A.L. & Sumarokova V.A. (1998). Doveriye predprinimateley k raznym vidam organizatsiy: regionalnyye osobennosti [The confidence of entrepreneurs in different types of organizations: regional features]. Sotsialno psikhologicheskaya dinamika v usloviyakh ekonomicheskikh izmeneniy. Moscow: Izd vo «Institut Psikhologii RAN. [in Russian]
Kupreychenko A.B. (2008). Psikhologiya doveriya i nedoveriya [Psychology of trust and mistrust]. Moscow: Izd vo «Institut psikhologii RAN». [in Russian]
Milner B.3. (2002). Teoriya organizatsii [Organization theory]. Uchebnik. Moscow: Infra-M. [in Russian]
Skripkina T.P. (2000). Psikhologiya doveriya [Psychology of trust]. Ucheb. posobiye dlya studentov vyssh. ped. ucheb. zavedeniy. Moscow: Izd. tsentr «Akademiya». [in Russian]
Chayka G. P. (2005). Kultura dіlovogo spіlkuvannya menedzhera [Business communication manager culture]. Kyiv : Znannya. [in Ukrainian]
Shaw R.B. (2000). Klyuchi k doveriyu v organizatsii: Rezultativnost. poryadochnost. proyavleniye zaboty [Trust in the Balance: Building Successful Organizations on Results, Integrity, and Concern]. Moscow : Delo. [in Russian]
Fine G. & Holyfield L. (1996). Secrecy, trust and dangerous leisure: generating group cohesion in voluntary organizations. Soc. Psychol. Q. V.59.
Lewicki R.J., Mcallister D.J. & Bies R.J. (1998). Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Academy of Management Review. V. 23. Is. 3. P. 438–459.
March J.G. & Olsen J.P. (1994). Democratic Governance. NY: Free Press.
Uzzi B. (1997). Social structure and competition interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Q. V. 42. P. 35–67.
Copyright Notice
Articles in the Psychological Journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. For more detailed information, please, fallow the link - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/