Abstract
The article is deals with the thorough theoretical consideration of the problem of the filter bubble, taking into account the positions of various scientists regarding it.
It is stated that, in the opinion of Е. Pariser and his followers, the existence of an information bubble represents a serious societal problem, the essence of which is that the recommendation algorithms of the Network, using all possible elements of personalization / identification of the user on the Internet, offer at his request only the information that is consistent with his past web searches, reflecting his interest, while ignoring and cutting out alternative information that may contradict his views.
In such a way, manipulation of information is carried out, and it loses its main quality – informativeness, at the same time losing the possibility of transformation into a knowledge system. This person does not know that he is in a filter bubble on the Web, and his awareness is limited to only the information which the Network opened to her, based on his past queries and activities on the Internet in general, and is unidirectional, intellectually isolating the user.
It is noted that, in our understanding, the filter bubble is an attempt by the algorithms that produce the rules for searching for information on the Web, based on the personalization of a person in it and his previous searches / actions, to turn whole streams of information into artificially created blocks / clips limited in scope and content, which distort the objective understanding of the information / situation, making it one-sided.
It is emphasized that the positive role of the filter bubble is visible in reducing the time it takes for a person to find interesting and important information on the Web. However, there are much more negative consequences of the existence of an information bubble, and one of them is a situation when a person is unable to understand that there may be various views on the same problem, different from his own, another is the polarization of society: its separation into private groups (with their own understanding of the situation), each of which considers himself the bearer of real knowledge and at the same time does not understand others.
It is noted that the phenomenon of the filter bubble caused a long lasting and still unfinished debate in science both about the existence of an information bubble and about the possibility of proving / disproving it empirically.
The validity of the scientists' opinion that, in addition to the filter bubble, there are no less effective critical filters in the human mind that limit his perception of reality, filtering the information he receives so that it is fully consistent with the views and convictions of a person is emphasized.
The conclusion is that the problem of the filter bubble is quite real, and silencing it, attempts to level or reduce its value can only worsen the situation, giving carte blanche to those who aspires to manipulate information on the Internet and society, hiding significant amounts of it that are important for a holistic understanding of various issues.
References
Bruns, A. (2019). Filter bubble. Internet Policy Review, 8(4). DOI:10.14763/2019.4.1426.
Bul'bashka fil'triv [Filter bubble]. (n.d.). Retrieved from: https://verified.ed-era.com/ua/social-media/part-a [in Ukrainian].
Carlson, M. (2007). Order versus access: News search engines and the challenge to traditional journalistic roles. Media, Culture & Society, 29(6), 1014–1030. DOI:10.1177/0163443707084346.
Chaplak, Ja.V., & Chujko, G.V. (2018). Klipova haotychnist' jak manipuljatyvna tehnologija social'no-psyhologichnogo vplyvu v kiberprostori [Chaotic clips as manipulative technology of social-psychological influence in cyberspace]. Psyhologichnyj chasopys, 13 (3), 21-40. DOI: 10.31108/2018vol13iss3pp21-40 [in Ukrainian].
Chujko, G.V. (2018). Manipuljatyvnist' informacijnogo vplyvu [Manipulativeness of information influence]. Technologies of Intellect Development, Vol. 2, 8 (19). DOI: 10.31108/3.2019.2.8.5 [in Ukrainian].
Chujko, G.V., & Zvarych, I.M. (2019). Specyfika informacii' v Interneti [Specificity of information on the Internet]. Psyhologichnyj chasopys, Vol.5, 12, 21-42. DOI: 10.31108/1.2019.5.12.2 [in Ukrainian].
Ćurković, M., & Košec, A. (2020) (Re)search Filter Bubble Effect – An Issue Still Unfairly Neglected. Advances in Nutrition, May 1, 11(3), 744. DOI: 10.1093/advances/nmz133.
Dahlgren, P. M. (2021). A critical review of filter bubbles and a comparison with selective exposure. Nordicom Review, vol.42, 1, 15-33. DOI:10.2478/nor-2021-0002.
Ekstrom, A. G., Niehorster, D. C., & Olsson, E. J. (2022). Self-imposed filter bubbles: Selective attention and exposure in online search. Computers in Human Behavior Reports. Vol. 7, August, 100226. DOI: 10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100226.
Filter bubble (2015). Cambridge dictionary. Retrieved from: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/filter-bubble.
Filter bubble. (n.d.). Retrieved from: https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/definition/filter-bubble.
Fisenko, T. (2013). Puzyr' fil'trov ili Kak Internet mozhet ogranichit' nashe «okno v mir» [The filter bubble or How the Internet can limit our “window to the world”]. Retrieved from: https://hi-tech.ua/article/puzyir-filtrov-ili-kak-internet-mozhet-ogranichit-nashe-okno-v-mir/ [in Russian].
Fletcher, R. (n. d.). The truth behind filter bubbles: Bursting some myths. Retrieved from: https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/news/truth-behind-filter-bubbles-bursting-some-myths.
Geschke, D., Lorenz, J., & Holtz, P. (2019). The triple-filter bubble: Using agent-based modelling to test a meta-theoretical framework for the emergence of filter bubbles and echo chambers. British Journal of Social Psychology. 58(1). 129–149. DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12286.
Guljas, I.A., & Chujko, G.V. (2016). Dvi storony predstavlennja sebe: samoprezentacija ta samorozkryttja [Two sides of self-presentation: self-presentation and self-disclosure]. Technologies of Intellect Development, Vol. 2, 3(14). Retrieved from: https://www.psytir.org.ua/upload/journals/2.3/authors/2016/Chujko_Galyna_Vasylivna_Guljas_Inesa_AntonivnaDvi_storony_predstavlennja_sebe_samoprezentacija_ta_samorozkryttjadf [in Ukrainian].
Gurov, F.N. (2019). Opyt social'no-filosofskogo osmyslenija problemy «fejkov» i «puzyrej fil'trov» v seti [Experience in socio-philosophical understanding of the problem of “fakes” and “filter bubbles” on the Internet]. Problemy sovremennogo obrazovanija, 3, 9-20 [in Russian].
Haim, M., Graefe, A., & Brosius, H.-B. (2017). Burst of the Filter Bubble? Effects of personalization on the diversity of Google News. Digital Journalism, issue 3, volume 6, 330-343. DOI: 10.1080/21670811.2017.1338145.
Han, H., Wang, C., & Zhao, Y. et al. (2022). SSLE: A framework for evaluating the “Filter Bubble” effect on the news aggregator and recommenders. World Wide Web, 25, 1169–1195. DOI:10.1007/s11280-022-01031-4
Holone, H. (2016). The filter bubble and its effect on online personal health information. Croatian medical journal, 57(3), 298-301. DOI: 10.3325/cmj.2016.57.298.
How filter bubbles isolate you. (n.d.). Retrieved from: https://edu.gcfglobal.org/en/digital-media-literacy/how-filter-bubbles-isolate-you/1/.
Informacionnye puzyri: chto takoe i kak borot'sja? [Information bubbles: what are they and how to fight them?]. (2019). Retrieved from: https://ehutimes.com/2019/03/20/informacionnye-puzyri-chto-takoe-i-kak/ [in Russian].
Kaluža, J. (2022). Far-reaching effects of the filter bubble, the most notorious metaphor in media studies. AI & Soc. DOI: 10.1007/s00146-022-01399-x.
Lunardi, G. M., Machado, G. M., Maran, V., Palazzo, & M. de Oliveira J. (2020). A metric for Filter Bubble measurement in recommender algorithms considering the news domain. Applied Soft Computing. Vol.97, Part A, 106771, December DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106771.
Min Y., Jiang T., Jin C., Li Q., & Jin X. (2019). Endogenetic structure of filter bubble in social networks. Royal Society open science. Nov 13; 6(11): 190868. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.190868
New study rejects the idea of filter bubbles. (2021). Retrieved from: https://www.nordicom.gu.se/en/latest/news/new-study-rejects-idea-filter-bubbles.
Pariser, E. (2015). Did Facebook’s Big Study Kill My Filter Bubble Thesis? Wired. Backchanal. Retrieved from: https://www.wired.com/2015/05/did-facebooks-big-study-kill-my-filter-bubble-thesis/.
Parizer, Jeli (2012). Za stenoj fil'trov. Chto internet skryvaet ot vas [Behind a wall of filters. What the Internet is hiding from you]. Moskva: Al'pina pablisher [in Russian].
Rhodes, S.C. (2021). Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Fake News: How Social Media Conditions Individuals to Be Less. Critical of Political Misinformation, 01 May, 1-22. DOI: 10.1080/10584609.2021.1910887.
Safronova, K., & Kryzhanovskaja, E. (2018). Informacionnye puzyri – chemu nel'zja verit' v socsetjah [Information bubbles – what you shouldn’t believe on social networks]. Retrieved from: https://p.dw.com/p/2qaeK [in Russian].
Tomlein, M., Pecher, B., Simko, J., Srba, I., Moro, R., Stefancova, E., Kompan, M., Hrckova, A., Podrouzek, J., & Bielikova, M. (2021). An Audit of Misinformation Filter Bubbles on YouTube: Bubble Bursting and Recent Behavior Changes. In Fifteenth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys ’21), September 27-October 1, 2021, Amsterdam, Netherlands. ACM, New York, NY, USA. DOI: 10.1145/3460231.3474241.
Viner, K. (2016). How technology disrupted the truth. The Guardian, 12.06.
Zvarych, I.M., Chujko, G.V, & Chaplak, Ja.V. (2021). Virtual'na identyfikacija suchasnoi' ljudyny [Virtual identification of a modern person]. Psyhologichnyj chasopys, 7, 2(46), 9-24. DOI: 10.31108/1.2021.7.2.1 [in Ukrainian].

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Yan Chaplak, Halyna Chuyko, Yaroslava Andrieieva
