INTER-SUBJECT INTERACTION IN COLLECTIVE GAME ACTIVITY
PDF 110-122 (Українська)

Keywords

intersubject interaction, intersubjectness, game, collective activity, experiment.

How to Cite

Nakonechna, M. (2018). INTER-SUBJECT INTERACTION IN COLLECTIVE GAME ACTIVITY. PSYCHOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 4(3), 110–122. https://doi.org/10.31108/2018vol13iss3pp110-122

Abstract

Theoretical analysis of intersubject cooperation problem and results undertaken from pilotage experimental study are presented in the article. The analysed idea of the article says that for the sake of intersubject cooperation is quite important what takes place between people, being diffused between them; what can not take place, if people do not co-operate. It is underlined that real intersubject cooperation assumes increased personality’s inner complexity, openness of a person to new challenges invoked by communication and dialogue. Conceptual vision of psychological phenomenon of intersubjectness is focused on three correlated aspects:

1) intersubject diffuseness into space of subject wills;

2) reciprocity aspect  (“I am a subject in relation to you and I am expecting you to be a mutual subject”);

3) developmental aspect: a function is intersubjective at first, diffused between people, but then it becomes intra-subjective, turning into an achievement of my own development (according to L.S. Vygotsky’s methodology).

It was proven that intersubject cooperation involves such communication that exposes subject qualities of a person during communication process, resulting in personal development.

Modified checkers game was chosen as experimental model. After a “classic” game session respondents were asked to play otherwise in order that the minimum of checkers should remain on a game board.

Following hypotheses were tested: 1) intersubject cooperation is a special form of organization of diffused activity, that is characterized by the only aim and predominance of collaboration strategy; 2) involvement into intersubject cooperation (as exemplified by “intersubject checkers”) increases human satisfaction rates.

After every game session in both classic and intersubject settings respondents were asked to estimate their satisfaction level using scale from 1 to 10, where 10 stands for the most satisfactory option. On most parameters subjectively estimated level of satisfaction is higher after intersubject checkers sessions. These data are confirmed by visual observation over players during different sessions. Research hypotheses were confirmed.

Consequently, initial ideas about intersubject cooperation as complex process of mutual development of subject qualities among human participants were further extended.

 

https://doi.org/10.31108/2018vol13iss3pp110-122
PDF 110-122 (Українська)

References

Перелік використаних джерел:

1. Вертгеймер М. Продуктивное мышление: Пер. с англ./ М. Вертгеймер. Общ. ред. С.Ф. Горбова и В.П. Зинченко. Вступ. ст. В. П. Зинченко. - М.: Прогресс, 1987. - 336 с.
2. Выготский Л. С. Собрание сочинений: В 6-ти т. Т.З. Проблемы развития психики / Л.С. Выготский. Под ред. А. М. Матюшкина. – М.: Педагогика, 1983. – 368 с.
3. Донцов А. И. Объективное и субъективное благополучие: два подхода к исследуемой проблеме / А.И. Донцов, Е.Б. Перелыгина, А.М. Рикель // Вопросы психологии, 2016, №5. – С. 3–14.
4. Дьяконов Г. В. Інтерсуб’єктні методи оцінювання психології особистості. Навчальний посібник для вищої школи / Г.В. Дьяконов. – Кіровоград: Лисенко В.Ф., 2012. – 36 с.
5. Знаков В. В. Новый этап развития психологических исследований субъекта / В.В. Знаков // Вопросы психологии, 2017, №2. – С. 3–16.
6. Сурьянинова Т. И. Особенности совместной деятельности младших школьников / Т.И. Сурьянинова, Н.В. Смирнов // Вопросы психологии, 2017, №2. – С. 58–66.
7. Толстых Н. Н. Отрочество: идентичность и субъектность / Н.Н. Толстых, И.Л. Угланова // Вопросы психологии, 2017, №1. – С. 15–26.
8. Фрідман М. Роль філософії у гуманістичній психології / М. Фрідман // Гуманістична психологія: Антологія: В 3-х т. / За ред. Р. Трача, Г. Балла. –– Т. 2: Психологія і духовність: (Світоглядні аспекти гуманістично зорієнтованих напрямів у сучасній західній психології) / Упоряд.: Г. Балл, Р. Трач. – К.: Унів. вид-во ПУЛЬСАРИ, 2005. – С. 88–99.
9. Deci E., Ryan R. The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior / Edward L. Deci, Richard M. Ryan // Psychological Inquiry, 2000, Vol. 11, No. 4. – C. 227–268.

References (Transliteration):

1. Vertgeymer M. Produktivnoe myishlenie: Per. s angl./ M. Vertgeymer. Obsch. red. S.F. Gorbova i V.P. Zinchenko. Vstup. st. V. P. Zinchenko. - M.: Progress, 1987. - 336 s.
2. Vygotskiy L. S. Sobranie sochineniy: V 6-ti t. T.Z. Problemyi razvitiya psihiki / L.S. Vygotskiy. Pod red. A. M. Matyushkina. – M.: Pedagogika, 1983. – 368 s.
3. Dontsov A. I. Ob'ektivnoe i sub'ektivnoe blagopoluchie: dva podhoda k issleduemoy probleme / A.I. Dontsov, E.B. Perelyigina, A.M. Rikel // Voprosyi psihologii, 2016, #5. – S. 3–14.
4. Dyakonov G. V. Intersub’ektnI metodi otsInyuvannya psihologiyi osobistostI. Navchalniy posIbnik dlya vischoYi shkoli / G.V. Dyakonov. – KIrovograd: Lisenko V.F., 2012. – 36 s.
5. Znakov V. V. Novyiy etap razvitiya psihologicheskih issledovaniy sub'ekta / V.V. Znakov // Voprosyi psihologii, 2017, #2. – S. 3–16.
6. Suryaninova T. I. Osobennosti sovmestnoy deyatelnosti mladshih shkolnikov / T.I. Suryaninova, N.V. Smirnov // Voprosyi psihologii, 2017, #2. – S. 58–66.
7. Tolstyih N. N. Otrochestvo: identichnost i sub'ektnost / N.N. Tolstyih, I.L. Uglanova // Voprosyi psihologii, 2017, #1. – S. 15–26.
8. Frіdman M. Rol fіlosofіyi u gumanIstichnIy psihologIYi / M. Fridman // GumanIstichna psihologIya: AntologIya: V 3-h t. / Za red. R. Tracha, G. Balla. –– T. 2: PsihologIya I duhovnist: (SvItoglyadnI aspekti gumanIstichno zorIEntovanih napryamIv u suchasnIy zahIdnIy psihologIYi) / Uporyad.: G. Ball, R. Trach. – K.: UnIv. vid-vo PULЬSARI, 2005. – S. 88–99.
9. Deci E., Ryan R. The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior / Edward L. Deci, Richard M. Ryan // Psychological Inquiry, 2000, Vol. 11, No. 4. – C. 227–268.

Copyright Notice

Articles in the Psychological Journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. For more detailed information, please, fallow the link - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/