ROLE OF PSYCHOANALYTIC THEORY IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF PARADIGMS IN LEGAL PSYCHOLOGY
PDF 70-82 (Українська)

Keywords

legal psychology
paradigm
anthropological paradigm
clinical paradigm
paradigm shift
psychoanalysis
legal behavior

How to Cite

Petrushenko , V. (2024). ROLE OF PSYCHOANALYTIC THEORY IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF PARADIGMS IN LEGAL PSYCHOLOGY. PSYCHOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 10(4), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.31108/1.2024.10.4.6

Abstract

Background. Taking into account the interdisciplinary nature of legal psychology and the fact that its research subject belongs to the problems of human mental activity, the development of legal psychology must be considered in the context of its influence took from various psychological paradigms. Since the role of behaviorism and cognitivism in legal psychology has a defined and systematized character due to the author’s work of Herbert Simon, John Watson, and Albert Bandura, there is a need to actualize the role of psychoanalysis in the psychology of law as another influential psychological direction.

Objective. To find out the influence of psychoanalytic concepts on the process of paradigmatic theoretical and methodological development of legal psychology according to the theory of the history of science by Thomas Samuel Kuhn.

Methods. To determine the influence of psychoanalytic theory on various legal-psychological paradigms article uses systemic, structural-functional, and comparative methods, which were needed to process and systematize the scientific work of researchers of legal psychology and representatives of psychoanalysis.

Results. The regularities of the development of scientific paradigms in psychology and legal psychology are characterized, in particular, by the outlined determinants of the formation of psychoanalysis and anthropological and clinical legal-psychological paradigms. The article systematize the concepts of psychoanalysis in the ideas of Sigmund Freud, Jacques Lacan, and Erich Fromm, considered examples of the implementation of their ideas at three stages of the development of legal psychology, determined the nature of the influence of psychoanalysis on the formation of paradigms of legal psychology.

Conclusions. Three stages of legal psychology development are structured, representing the varying impacts of psychoanalysis on legal and psychological evolution. This text compares the development trends of psychoanalysis and legal psychology at the beginning of the 20th century. It highlights the similarities between the emergence of the clinical paradigm in legal psychology and the evolution of psychoanalytic theory as a psychological approach that became distinct from clinical practice. The stage of rethinking and transformation of psychoanalysis in the middle of the 20th century and its temporary disintegration with trends in the development of legal psychology are analyzed. Erich Fromm’s teachings are systematized in the context of his influence on existential-humanistic and socio-contextual legal-psychological paradigms.

Keywords: legal psychology, paradigm, anthropological paradigm, clinical paradigm, paradigm shift, psychoanalysis, legal behavior.

 

 

https://doi.org/10.31108/1.2024.10.4.6
PDF 70-82 (Українська)

References

Amar, J. (2019). Le patrimoine, transmettre, soumettre ou démettre ? Ce que le droit peut apporter à la compréhension de la psychanalyse. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Philosophia, 64 (2), 145-152 https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphil.2019.2.08

Bercherie, P. (2022). Formation of the psychoanalytic field. L Évolution Psychiatrique, 87(3), 19-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evopsy.2022.07.002

Bercherie, P., Fromentin, C., & Lepoutre, T. (2021). De l’épistémologie de la psychiatrie à une épistémologie psychanalytique. Entretien avec Paul Bercherie, 17 avril 2021. L Évolution Psychiatrique, 86(3), 573-590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evopsy.2021.08.015

Born, G. (1998). Anthropology, Kleinian psychoanalysis, and the subject in culture. American Anthropologist, 100(2), 373-386. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1998.100.2.373

Burt, R. A. (2016). Los usos del psicoanálisis en el derecho: la fuerza del ejemplo de Jay Katz. Derecho PUCP, 77, 11-26. https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.201602.001

Chacón, D. M. I. (2021). Psicoanálisis y medicina: ¿qué obediencia se instaura en la emergencia? Desde El Jardín De Freud, 21, 103-119. https://doi.org/10.15446/djf.n21.101225

Civitarese, G. (2023). Sul concetto di intersoggettività in psicoanalisi. Psicoterapia e scienze umane, 3, 375-398. https://doi.org/10.3280/pu2023-003002

Conci, M. (2023). Psychoanalytic ego psychology: A European perspective. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 32(1), 4-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/0803706x.2022.2128210

Courret, L. (2023). Création littéraire et littérature schizophrénique : Deleuze et Guattari lecteurs de Freud. L Évolution Psychiatrique, 88(4), 525-537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evopsy.2023.07.007

Dagfal, A. A. (2018). Psychology and psychoanalysis in Argentina: Politics, French thought, and the university connection, 1955–1976. History of Psychology, 21(3), 254-272. https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000071

De Carvalho, J. M., & Moreira-Almeida, A. (2023). Existential meaning, spiritual unconscious and spirituality in Viktor Frankl. Journal of Religion and Health, 63(1), 31-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-023-01902-8

De Souza, P. F. (2023). Freud e a ética do fragmento. Griot Revista De Filosofia, 23(3), 131-146. https://doi.org/10.31977/grirfi.v23i3.3443

Durkin, K. (2023). Book review: Neil McLaughlin, Erich Fromm and Global Public Sociology. Sociology, 57(1), 253-254. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385221081396

Fischer, J. (2023). Object lessons and the desire of psychoanalysis. Feminist Theory, 24(2), 309-316. https://doi.org/10.1177/14647001221143035

Flanagan, B. (2023). The burning armchair: can jurisprudence be advanced by experiment? Jurisprudence, 15(3), 325-340. https://doi.org/10.1080/20403313.2023.2290954

Freud, S. (1930). Das Unbehagen in der Kultur. Wien: Internationaler Psychoanalytischer Verlag. 127 s.

Fromm, E. (1994). Escape from Freedom. New York: Henry Holt and Company. 301 p. https://openlibrary.org/books/OL1082108M/Escape_from_freedom

Funk, R. (2022). Erich Fromms Sozialpsychoanalyse und ihre Bedeutung für die Gegenwart. Forum Der Psychoanalyse, 38(3), 265-279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00451-022-00472-x

Gammeltoft, T. M., & Segal, L. B. (2016). Anthropology and Psychoanalysis: Explorations at the edges of culture and consciousness. Ethos, 44(4), 399-410. https://doi.org/10.1111/etho.12138

Gilleri, G. (2023). Human Rights Discourses and Subject Formations: Tainting Queer Theory with Psychoanalysis. Australian Feminist Law Journal, 49(1), 39-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/13200968.2023.2188695

Gonzalez-Torres, M. A. (2023). Politics, psychoanalysis, and large group identity. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 32(4), 227-232. https://doi.org/10.1080/0803706x.2023.2234682

Hjørland, B. (2002). Epistemology and the socio‐cognitive perspective in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(4), 257-270. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10042

Holguin, A. J. (2022). Lacanian Psychoanalysis and Eastern Orthodox Christian Anthropology in Dialogue (1st ed.). International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 33(1), 85-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2022.2094667

Hollan, D. W. (2022). Anthropology and Psychoanalysis: The Looping Effects of Persons and social Worlds. Annual Review of Anthropology, 51(1), 155-171. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-101819-110107

Janus, L. (2021). Möglichkeiten der Erneuerung der Psychoanalyse und der tiefenpsychologisch fundierten Psychotherapie durch Vervollständigung der theoretischen und praktischen Grundlagen. Zeitschrift Für Individualpsychologie, 46(3), 201-223. https://doi.org/10.13109/zind.2021.46.3.201

Jofré, D., & Bilbao, A. (2022). Wittgenstein y el psicoanálisis: aproximaciones desde el lenguaje, la ética y el sujeto. Alpha Revista De Artes Letras Y Filosofía, 1(54), 23-39. https://doi.org/10.32735/s0718-2201202200054995

Julien, P., & Simiu, D. B. (1994). Jacques Lacan’s Return to Freud: The Real, the Symbolic, and the Imaginary. NYU Press. 238 p. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt9qg04q

Katkowski, K. (2023). Pojęcie prawa u Freuda i Durkheima. Fakt społeczny, obiekt czy tabu? Krytyka Prawa, 15(1), 153-175 https://doi.org/10.7206/kp.2080-1084.576

Kluckhohn, C. (1962). Culture and behavior: collected essays. New York : Free Press of Glencoe. 423 p.

Kurek, Ł. (2021). Law, Folk Psychology and Cognitive Science. In B. Brożek, J. Hage, & N. Vincent (Eds.), Law and Mind: A Survey of Law and the Cognitive Sciences (pp. 55-85). chapter, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/law-and-mind/law-folk-psychology-and-cognitive-science/F6C5303E0585E168368EEFCB29A8449E

Kurek, Ł. (2017). Supervenience and the Normativity of Folk Psychology in the Legal-Philosophical Context. In Law and philosophy library (pp. 161-175). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61046-7_9

Lacan, J. (1973). Seminaire 11: Les quatre concepts fondamentaux de la psychanalyse. Paris: Seuil. 325 p. https://nosubject.com/images/0/0c/Seminaire_11.pdf

Lekesizalin, F. (2023). Enjoying the Symptom: David Foster Wallace’s Brief Interviews with Hideous Men. Journal of Literary Studies, 39. https://doi.org/10.25159/1753-5387/13519

Lombroso, C. (1871). L’uomo bianco e l’uomo di colore. Letture sull’ origine e le varietà delle razze umane. Padova: Tip. F. Sacchetto. 213 p. https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_nXppzBTEFU8C/page/n3/mode/2up

Lombroso, C. (1876). L’uomo delinquente: studiato in rapporto alla antropologia, alla medicina legale ed alle discipline carcerarie. Milano: Hoepli. 255 p. https://archive.org/details/luomodelinquente00lomb/page/254/mode/2up

Luhrmann, T. M. (2011). The Subject of Anthropology: Gender, Symbolism, and Psychoanalysis by Henrietta Moore. American Ethnologist, 38(4), 843-844. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1425.2011.01339_24.x

Maiwald, F. (2023). The Emancipative Potential of the Social Unconscious: Erich Fromm’s Renewal of Freud’s Approach as a Link between Ethico-Political and Psychoanalytical Forms of Social Critique. Revista De Humanidades De Valparaíso, 23, 53-68. https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2023iss23pp53-68

Martin, S. (2023). Why using «consciousness» in psychotherapy? Insight, metacognition and self-consciousness. New Ideas in Psychology, 70, № 101015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2023.101015

Martins, V. M. N. (2023). Le complexe d’Œdipe et les systèmes de parenté face aux transformations de la famille contemporaine : Un débat entre anthropologie et psychanalyse. Analysis, 7(2), 100345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inan.2023.100345

Massot, A. (2020). Kuhn dans la « révolution cognitive ». Revue D Anthropologie Des Connaissances, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.4000/rac.4796

Michael, M. T. (2023). Psychoanalytic proof: Revisiting Freud’s Tally Argument. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 104(2), 331-355. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207578.2022.2137675

Morita, K. (2022). Radicalizing the role of the emancipatory teacher in the crisis of democracy: Erich Fromm’s Psychoanalytic Approach to deweyan Democratic Education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 41(4), 467-483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-022-09830-y

Pavón-Cuéllar, D. (2021). Hacia otra psicología freudiana de las masas: más allá del gran crustáceo y su loca invertebrada. Desde El Jardín De Freud, 21, 179-198. https://doi.org/10.15446/djf.n21.101234

Rivera, P. S. (2017). «Freud’s speculations in ethnology»: A reflection on anthropology’s encounter with psychoanalysis. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 98(3), 755-778. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-8315.12616

Robins, R. W., Gosling, S. D., & Craik, K. H. (1999). An empirical analysis of trends in psychology. American Psychologist, 54(2), 117-128. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.54.2.117

Ross, L. (2023). The Foundations of Criminal Law Epistemology. Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy, 9(0). https://doi.org/10.3998/ergo.3583

Salgar, E. (2023). Thomas S. Kuhn and the transformation of the concept of «Scientific progress.» Beytulhikme an International Journal of Philosophy, 13(13:3), 130-157. https://doi.org/10.29228/beytulhikme.69294

Serina, F., Forner, E., Aronov, M., & Amouroux, R. (2023). Psychanalyse et thérapies cognitives-comportementales en France : l’improbable rencontre (1971-2011). L Évolution Psychiatrique, 88(2), 257-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evopsy.2023.01.002

Singer, S. (2022). Development of Three Psychology Sub-Disciplines over the past 30 years: A citation analysis. Review of General Psychology, 27(2), 164-176. https://doi.org/10.1177/10892680221133785

Scholten, H. (2023). «Das ist nicht die Psychoanalyse». Algunas reflexiones sobre las definiciones freudianas del psicoanálisis: teoría, práctica y política. Revista De Humanidades De Valparaíso, 23, 35-51. https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2023iss23pp35-51

Serina, F., Forner, E., Aronov, M., & Amouroux, R. (2023). Psychanalyse et thérapies cognitives-comportementales en France: L’improbable rencontre (1971-2011). L’Évolution Psychiatrique. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evopsy.2023.01.002

Sparrow, V. (2020). Justice denied: literary, legal and psychoanalytic denial in the age of modernism. Open Library of Humanities, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.16995/olh.490

Sucharov, M. S., & Delva, M. (2022). Towards a spiritual psychoanalytic activism. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 42(8), 699-712. https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2022.2134719

Turco, R. (2001). Psychoanalytic Clinical practice. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 55(1), 141-144. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2001.55.1.141

Van De Graaf, C. (2021). Procedural fairness: Between human rights law and social psychology. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 39(1), 11-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0924051921992749

Wakefield, J. C. (2023). L’anti-Edipo dalla prospettiva della filosofia della scienza e da quella foucaultiana del sapere-potere. Psicoterapia e scienze umane, 2, 187-212. https://doi.org/10.3280/pu2023-002002

Warmling, D. L., & Bastone, P. (2023). Freud e o descentramento da subjetividade: o inconsciente como via de recusa consciencialista. Griot Revista De Filosofia, 23(2), 79-98. https://doi.org/10.31977/grirfi.v23i2.3270

Webster, J. (2023). The most hysterical psychoanalyst. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 71(5), 907-931. https://doi.org/10.1177/00030651231209737

Weiss, H. (2023). Receptivity is not passivity: A comparison between psychoanalysis and phenomenology concerning experience, judgement and the analytic attitude. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 104(5), 886-897. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207578.2023.2255468

Wundt, W. (1904). Völkerpsychologie: eine Untersuchung der Entwicklungsgesetze von Sprache, Mythus und Sitte. Leipzig : Wilhelm Engelmann. 693 p.

Yadin, Z. S. (2022). Lost in a universe of no inherent meaning: psychoanalysis and existentialism. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 58(4), 579-611. https://doi.org/10.1080/00107530.2023.2210489

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Viktoriia Petrushenko