Keywords
sychological hardiness
resilience
self-determination
psychological well-being
self-efficacy
meaning in life
autonomy
adaptation
coping
How to Cite
Abstract
Despite the extensive body of research on psychological hardiness, a significant theoretical gap remains regarding the role of identity as an integrative mechanism underlying its structural components. Existing models predominantly conceptualize hardiness as a set of dispositional traits (commitment, control, and challenge), while insufficient attention is paid to identity as a dynamic self-regulatory system that ensures coherence, meaning-making, and adaptive functioning under stress.
Purpose.
This study aims to conceptualize identity as a core internal resource of psychological hardiness and to empirically examine its role in the formation and regulation of commitment, control, and challenge.
Methods.
The empirical study was conducted on a large heterogeneous sample (N = 1075; age range 14–70). A set of validated psychometric instruments was employed, including the Maddi Hardiness Test, Shostrom Self-Actualization Test, Sheldon Self-Determination Scale, Schwarzer & Jerusalem General Self-Efficacy Scale, and Ryff Psychological Well-Being Scale. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and correlation analysis (SPSS 21.0).
Results.
The findings indicate a predominance of a medium level of hardiness (68.2%). Significant positive correlations were found between identity-related constructs and hardiness indicators, particularly psychological well-being (r = 0.63, p < .01), meaning in life (r = 0.58, p < .01), environmental mastery (r = 0.71, p < .01), and autonomy (r = 0.59, p < .01). Negative correlations were identified between affect imbalance and hardiness (r = −0.52, p < .01). Two key mechanisms were identified: (1) a meaning-making mechanism, linking identity with commitment through value differentiation and self-acceptance, and (2) a regulatory mechanism, linking identity with control through autonomy and internal locus of support.
Conclusions.
The study demonstrates that identity functions as a multi-level, dynamic system that integrates self-actualization, self-determination, and psychological well-being, thereby serving as a fundamental predictor of psychological hardiness. The results extend existing theoretical models by positioning identity as a system-forming construct rather than a secondary correlate.
Implications.
The findings have practical implications for the development of psychological interventions aimed at strengthening resilience through identity-based resources, including autonomy, meaning in life, and self-acceptance. Future research should employ longitudinal and structural equation modeling approaches to establish causal relationships and cross-cultural generalizability.
Keywords: identity; psychological hardiness; resilience; self-determination; psychological well-being; self-efficacy; meaning in life; autonomy; adaptation; coping.
Date of receipt: September 4, 2025
Date of acceptance for publication: October 20, 2025
Date of publication: October 30, 2025
References
Kokun, O. M. (2025). Zhyttiestiikist i rezylientnist liudyny v suchasnomu sviti: teoriia, doslidzhennia, praktyka [Life hardiness and resilience of a person in the modern world: Theory, research, practice]. Instytut psykholohii imeni H. S. Kostiuka NAPN Ukrainy.
Kononenko, O. I., Kononenko, A. O., Kroshka, K. I., & Bazyka, Ye. L. (2023). Zhyttiestiikist ta tsinnisni oriientatsii osobystosti yak psykholohichni resursy yii psykholohichnoho zdorovia. Naukovi perspektyvy, 9(39), 565–575.
Onishchenko, N. (2025). Psykholohichni osoblyvosti zhyttiestiikosti vnutrishno peremishchenykh osib v umovakh viiny. Problemy ekstremalnoi ta kryzovoi psykholohii, 2(10), 153–166. http://repositsc.nuczu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/26907/1/DCPP-2%2810%29%202025-153-166.pdf
Serdiuk, L. Z. (Ed.). (2018). Psykholohichni tekhnolohii samodeterminatsii rozvytku osobystosti [Psychological technologies of self-determination of personality development]. Instytut psykholohii imeni H. S. Kostiuka NAPN Ukrainy. https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/id/eprint/712878/
Serdiuk, L. Z. (Ed.). (2021). Samodeterminatsiia psykholohichnoho blahopoluchchia osobystosti [Self-determination of psychological well-being of personality]. Vydavets Viktoriia Kundelska. https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/id/eprint/729023/
Sosniuk, O. P., Ostapenko, I. V., & Kirova, K. O. (2023). Zviazok mizh natsionalnoiu identychnistiu ta zhyttiestiikistiu ukrainskoi studentskoi molodi v umovakh voiennoho chasu. Ukrainskyi psykholohichnyi zhurnal, 2(20), 113–130. https://doi.org/10.17721/upj.2023.2(20).8
Tytarenko, T. M., & Larina, T. O. (2009). Zhyttiestiikist osobystosti: sotsialna neobkhidnist ta bezpeka [Hardiness of personality: Social necessity and security]. Marych. https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/id/eprint/9065/1/Zhiznestoykost_lichnosti.pdf
Chykhantsova, O. (2021). Psykholohichni osnovy zhyttiestiikosti osobystosti [Psychological foundations of personality hardiness]. Talkom. https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/id/eprint/727629/
Yushchenko, I. M., & Panchenko, T. S. (2024). Profesiina identychnist yak chynnyk zhyttiestiikosti osobystosti. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia: Psykholohiia, 1, 17–20. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/nvuups_2024_1_5
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Frankl, V. E. (2006). Man’s search for meaning: An introduction to logotherapy (4th ed.). Beacon Press. https://antilogicalism.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/mans-search-for-meaning.pdf
Maddi, S. (1998). Dispositional hardiness in health and effectiveness. In H. S. Friedman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mental health (pp. 323–335). Academic Press.
Maddi, S., & Khoshaba, D. (1994). Hardiness and mental health. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63(2), 265–274. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6302_6
Maddi, S. R. (2006). Hardiness: The courage to grow from stresses. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1, 160–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760600619609
Maddi, S. R. (2013). Hardiness as the existential courage to grow through searching for meaning. In J. A. Hicks & C. Routledge (Eds.), The experience of meaning in life: Classical perspectives, emerging themes, and controversies (pp. 227–239). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6527-6_18
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1–28.
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069
Shostrom, E. L. (1964). An inventory for the measurement of self-actualization. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 24(2), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446402400203
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Olena Chykhantsova