FACTOR STRUCTURE AND PSYCHOLOGICAL FEATURES OF FUTURE EDUCATORS’ LEADERSHIP POSITION
PDF 7-26 (Українська)

Keywords

leadership
leadership position
subjective risk intelligence
Dark Triad
behavioral self-control
self-possession
self-esteem
future educators
psychological determinants

How to Cite

Boichuk, Y., Kuznietsov, M., & Kabus, N. (2025). FACTOR STRUCTURE AND PSYCHOLOGICAL FEATURES OF FUTURE EDUCATORS’ LEADERSHIP POSITION . PSYCHOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 11(5), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.31108/1.2025.11.5.1

Abstract

The article emphasizes that leadership reflects the degree of influence on other people and is a particularly important competence for future educators, because only leaders can form leaders who have an active life position and are capable of distributed team leadership in various areas of social life.

Future educators’ leadership position is defined as a system of attitudes that is formed in future specialists in relation to the world, students, themselves, and professional activity. This position is manifested in a stable motivational and cognitive orientation, actions and behavior, readiness to feel, think and act as a leader, be an example for students, act as a coach and facilitator in the educational process, motivate and inspire the younger generation to consciously develop their own personality, achieve high results in learning and life.

The use of the B.M. Bass & B.J. Avolio Multidisciplinary Leadership Questionnaire to study the features of manifestations of transformational (influence, ability to inspire, intellectual stimulation, individual approach) and transactional (motivation, management, granting independence) leadership in the education system has been justified. It has been empirically confirmed that the most pronounced indicators of the leadership position of future educators are influence, ability to inspire and motivate students. The least pronounced one is the ability to provide independence to students, which indicates the orientation of future specialists towards the use of direct management methods in the educational process.

Comparison of average values for leadership indicators in the groups of “leaders” and “non-leaders” showed that future educators who are “leaders” are characterized by above-average and high indicators for most manifestations of transformational and transactional leadership. “Non-leaders” are distinguished by the predominance of average and below-average manifestations for most of the studied indicators. This confirms the need to strengthen work on forming a sustainable leadership position of future specialists in the field of education.

As a result of the empirical study, it was confirmed that the willingness to act in situations of risk, imagination, decision-making effectiveness, positive acceptance of uncertainty, developed cognitive, emotional and volitional self-control, healthy narcissism, event and existential self- possession, as well as self-esteem associated with the effectiveness of actions, successful social relations and appearance, are important psychological characteristics of a leader in conditions of uncertainty and risk. They are positively correlated with most manifestations of transformational and transactional leadership in education.

According to the results of factor analysis, four factors were identified in the structure of the leadership position of future educators. They are “Acceptance of uncertainty, self-possession and behavioral self-control”; “High creativity and decision-making efficiency”, “Self-esteem, conditioned by appearance and successful interaction with others” and “Reserved empathy”. The obtained results can be used in the development of a training program aimed at developing psychological constructs of leadership in higher pedagogical education students and establishing sustainable leadership in professional activities.

 

https://doi.org/10.31108/1.2025.11.5.1
PDF 7-26 (Українська)

References

Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1995). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire Leader Form (5X-Short). Mind Garden. https://doi.org/10.1037/t03624-000

Boichuk, Yu. D., & Zelenska, L. D. (2025). H.S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University: pages of history and today's achievements. Psychological and pedagogical problems of higher and secondary education in the conditions of modern challenges: theory and practice. Materials of the 9th International Scientific and Practical Conference (Kharkiv, March 19–20, 2025). Kharkiv: H.S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University, р. 14-22.

Boychuk, Yu., Kuznetsov, M., Tatiyevska, М., & Korolev І. (2024). The specificity of PTSD symptom manifestation in the personal dimension of life and activity of military personnel and civilians during war. Bulletin of H.S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University. Psychology, 72, 55-87. https://doi.org/10.34142/23129387.2025.72.04

Boichuk, Yu. D., & Miroshnychenko, O. M. (2025). The role of psychological training of scientific and pedagogical workers in preventing emergencies under martial law. Prevention of emergencies, response and elimination of their consequences: materials of the round table (Cherkasy, February 28, 2025). Cherkasy: National University of Civil Protection of Ukraine, р. 27-29.

Brooks, J. S., Scribner, J. P., & Eferakorho, J. (2004). Teacher leadership in the context of whole school reform. Journal of School Leadership, 14, 242-265. DOI:10.1177/105268460401400301

Burns, J. M.G. (2003). Transforming Leadership: A New Pursuit of Happiness. New York: Atlantic Monthly Press.

Chew, J. O. A., & Andrews, D. (2010). Enabling teachers to become pedagogical leaders: Case studies of two IDEAS schools in Singapore and Australia. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 9, 59-74. doi:10.1007/s10671-010-9079-0

Collinson, V. (2012). Leading by learning, learning by leading. Professional Development in Education, 38, 247-266. doi:10.1080/19415257.2012.657866

Craparo G., Magnano P., Paolillo A., & Costantino, V. (2018). The Subjective Risk Intelligence Scale. The development of a new scale to measure a new construct. Current Psychology, 37 (4), 966-981. DOI:10.1007/s12144-017-9673-x

Heatherton, T. F., & Polivy, J. (1991). Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(6), 895–910. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.895

Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Introducing the Short Dark Triad (SD3): A Brief Measure of Dark Personality Traits. Assessment, 21(1), 28-41. DOI:10.1177/1073191113514105

Kabus, N.D. (2024). Psychological determinants of the formation of future educators’ leadership position. – Qualifying work for a master's degree in specialty 053 Psychology. Kharkiv: H.S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University, 191 p.

Kabus, N. D., & Kuznietsov, M. A. (2024). Psychological aspects of educational leadership. Scientific achievements of contemporary society: Proceedings of IV International Scientific and Practical Conference (London, November 7-9, 2024). London, Cognum Publishing House, р. 518-523.

Kokun, О., & Humeniuk H. (2025). Monitoring the Psychological Consequences of War Stress Among Professionals in Psychological and Pedagogical Professions: Conceptual Approaches and Practical Solutions. Technologies for the Development of Intelligence. G.S. Kostiuk Institute of Psychology, the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 1(9). https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/id/eprint/745471/1/676-1186-1-PB.pdf

Kokun, O. (2025). The stability of mental health during war: Survey data from Ukraine. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 30(2), 242-263. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325024.2024.2328649

Kokun, O., & Bezverkhyi, O. (2024). Ukrainian students’ personal resources and resistance to war stress: A cross-sectional survey. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 29(8), 976-993. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325024.2024.2325084

Kokun, О, Serdiuk L., & Vus, V. (2025). Personality Characteristics in Schoolteachers’ Occupational Motivation. European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2025, 17 (1). 76-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24818/ejis.2025.05

Kuznetsov, M. А., & Halata, О. S. (2021). Persistence of educational actions in schoolchildren and students: monograph. Kharkiv: Publishing house "Disa Plus".

Kuznietsov, M. A., & Kabus N. D. (2024). Manifestation of leadership characteristics of future educators in the context of their risk readiness. Prospects and Innovations of Science. Series “Psychology”, 9(43), 590-603. https://doi.org/10.52058/2786-4952-2024-9(43)-590-603

Lahodzinska, V. (2024). The impact of the creative potential of educational staff on their mental health and subjective well-being during the war and post-war periods. Psychological journal, 10(4), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.31108/1.2024.10.4.4

Melnychuk, T. I., (2025). Stress resistance and subjective well-being of educators: theoretical and methodological review. Vectors of social, organizational and economic psychology: abstracts of the IV International Scientific and Practical Conference (Kyiv, February 28, 2025). Kyiv: State University of Trade and Economics, pp. 181-184.

Melnychuk,T., & Lukianchuk,V. (2025). Coping strategies as a factor in stress resistance of military and civilians in war conditions. Organizational psychology. Economic psychology, 35(2), 7-15. https://doi.org/10.31108/2.2025.2.35.1

Wenner, J. A. & Campbell, T. (2017). The Theoretical and Empirical Basis of Teacher Leadership: A Review of the Literature. Review of Educational Research, 87(1), pp.134-171. doi: 10.3102/003465431665347

Zholinska, O.O. (2024). Predictors of academic procrastination in students. Qualifying work for a master's degree in specialty 053 Psychology. Kharkiv: H.S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University. 59 p.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Yurii Boichuk, Marat Kuznietsov, Natalia Kabus