Abstract
This article significantly expands the understanding of psychological factors that influence vaccination decisions, especially in the context of cross-cultural differences. The work analyzes how factors such as chemophobia, locus of health control, collective responsibility, and epistemological beliefs shape vaccination attitudes among Ukrainians. This approach allows us to take into account the multifaceted influence of individual and socio-cultural factors, which makes the study results particularly valuable for the development of adapted communication strategies in the field of public health. The study examines in detail the psychological processes that underlie vaccination decisions. This allows us to supplement current theories of health psychology and better understand why people may refuse vaccination even when it is justified from a public health perspective. Comparisons with other countries highlight the importance of cultural context in shaping attitudes towards vaccination, showing that trust in the health system and social responsibility are significant predictors of vaccination readiness, which may vary by country.
Adapted psychometric instruments were developed for the Ukrainian sample, which increase the validity of the data obtained and provide a basis for further research in this cultural context. The results of the study offer new opportunities for developing effective communication strategies aimed at reducing chemophobia, increasing trust in vaccination and collective responsibility. This includes creating information materials that transparently explain the mechanisms of action of vaccines, emphasizing their safety and importance for society. An emphasis on collective responsibility can increase vaccination rates, especially if communication campaigns pay attention to the protection of vulnerable groups and the importance of individual contributions to the health of society.
Further studies plan to expand the sample and include additional cultural variables for more detailed analysis, as well as conduct longitudinal studies that will assess the dynamics of changes in attitudes towards vaccination and the effectiveness of communication strategies.
References
Ministry of Health of Ukraine. (n.d.). 42% ukrayintsiv, yaki shche ne vaktsynuvalysʹ vid COVID-19, hotovi tse zrobyty — doslidzhennya YUNISEF [42% of Ukrainians who have not yet been vaccinated against COVID-19 are ready to do so — UNICEF research]. Retrieved from https://moz.gov.ua/article/news/42-ukrainciv-jaki-sche-ne-vakcinuvalis-vid-covid-19-gotovi-ce-zrobiti---doslidzhennja-junisef
Khomin, S., Shyroka, A., Zawada, T., & Pelekh, I. (2022). Irratsionalʹni perekonannya, vira u teoriyi zmovy ta strak vaktsynatsiyi: Psykholohichnyy portret osib, yaki vidmovlyayutʹsya vaktsynuvatysya proty COVID-19 [Irrational beliefs, belief in conspiracy theories, and fear of vaccination: A psychological portrait of people refusing vaccination against COVID-19]. Habitus, 38, 166–173. https://doi.org/10.32843/2663-5208.2022.38.28
Alenezi, S., et al. (2022). Parental perceptions and the 5C psychological antecedents of COVID-19 vaccination during the first month of omicron variant surge: A large-scale cross-sectional survey in Saudi Arabia. Frontiers in Pediatrics, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.944165
Ashipala, D. O., et al. (2023). Barriers and facilitators affecting the uptake of COVID-19 vaccines: A qualitative perspective of frontline nurses in Namibia. SAGE Open Nursing, 9. https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608231158419
Benin, A., et al. (2006). Qualitative analysis of mothers' decision-making about vaccines for infants: The importance of trust. Pediatrics, 117, 1532–1541. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2005-1728
Harmsen, I. A., et al. (2012). Factors that influence vaccination decision-making by parents who visit an anthroposophical child welfare center: A focus group study. Advances in Preventive Medicine, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/175694
Kilich, E., et al. (2020). Factors that influence vaccination decision-making among pregnant women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234827
Kolawole, O. M., et al. (2024). Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine uptake in Kwara State, Nigeria: The role of public health management professionals in driving behavioral change. Global Health Economics and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.36922/ghes.2462
Sallam, M., et al. (2022). The role of psychological factors and vaccine conspiracy beliefs in influenza vaccine hesitancy and uptake among Jordanian healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Vaccines, 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10081355
Troiano, G., Torchia, G., & Nardi, A. (2022). Vaccine hesitancy among Ukrainian refugees. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene, 63(4), 566–572. https://doi.org/10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2022.63.4.2774
Uyanık, G. K., & Güler, N. (2013). A study on multiple linear regression analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 234–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.027
Vardavas, R., et al. (2007). Can influenza epidemics be prevented by voluntary vaccination? PLoS Computational Biology, 3. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030085
Wiedermann, C., et al. (2023). Unravelling vaccine scepticism in South Tyrol, Italy: A qualitative analysis of personal, relational, and structural factors influencing vaccination decisions. Healthcare, 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11131908
Wismans, A., et al. (2021). Psychological characteristics and the mediating role of the 5C model in explaining students’ COVID-19 vaccination intention. PLoS ONE, 16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255382
Xia, S., & Liu, J. (2013). A computational approach to characterizing the impact of social influence on individuals’ vaccination decision-making. PLoS ONE, 8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060373
Xia, S., & Liu, J. (2014). A belief-based model for characterizing the spread of awareness and its impacts on individuals' vaccination decisions. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 11. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2014.0013

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Ivan Danyliuk, Karine Malysheva, Oleksandra Loshenko, Anton Kurapov, Illia Yahiiaiev, Sergii Lytvyn
