THE DEVELOPMENT AND APPROBATION OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR DETECTING THE TENDENCY TO GOSSIP (TTGQ – TENDENCY TO GOSSIP QUESTIONNAIRE): A PILOT STUDY
PDF 7-14 (Українська)

Keywords

gossiping
interpersonal relationships
social dynamics
emotional state
false information
psychodiagnostic questionnaire

How to Cite

Balashevych, O., Orliuk, O., & Proskurnia , A. (2023). THE DEVELOPMENT AND APPROBATION OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR DETECTING THE TENDENCY TO GOSSIP (TTGQ – TENDENCY TO GOSSIP QUESTIONNAIRE): A PILOT STUDY. PSYCHOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 9(2), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.31108/1.2023.9.2.1

Abstract

Gossiping is a widespread phenomenon in interpersonal relationships, significantly impacting social dynamics and the emotional state of participants. It has the potential to create distrust and conflict, especially when false information is involved. Despite its prevalence, there is a lack of reliable instruments to measure gossip propensity. This article aims to present the results of a pilot study that involved developing and validating a psychodiagnostic questionnaire to identify individuals' inclination to engage in gossip. To achieve this, an analysis of classical and modern scientific sources was conducted to explore gossip as both a psychological and social construct. The article outlines the stages of questionnaire development and highlights adjustments made based on the obtained results. The internal consistency of the questionnaire was assessed using Cronbach's Alpha, resulting in a coefficient of 0.838 for the overall scale and 0.634 for the lying subscale. These coefficients indicate a high level of reliability, suggesting that the questionnaire items effectively measure the same underlying construct and exhibit interrelatedness. Thus, the results obtained using this questionnaire can be considered reliable and accurate, making it an effective tool for measuring tendencies towards gossiping. The psychodiagnostic questionnaire presented in this study fills the gap in existing measurement instruments, providing researchers with a valuable tool to explore and understand gossip propensity in interpersonal relationships.

 

https://doi.org/10.31108/1.2023.9.2.1
PDF 7-14 (Українська)

References

Bosson, J., K., Johnson, A., B., Niederhoffer, K., & Swann W.B., Jr (2006). Interpersonal chemistry through negativity: Bonding by sharing negative attitudes about others. Personal Relationships, 13(2), 135-150.

DiFonzo, N., & Bordia, P. (2002). Corporate rumor activity, belief and accuracy. Public Relations Review, 28(1), 1-19.-Pillemer, D. B., & McCartney, K. (2019). Gossip: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(6), 1781-1786.

DiFonzo, N., & Bordia, P. (2007). Rumor psychology: Social and organizational approaches. American Psychological Association.

Dunbar, R. I. M. (2004). Gossip in evolutionary perspective. Review of General Psychology, 8(2), 100-110.

Dunbar, R. I. M. (2004). Gossip in evolutionary perspective. Review of General Psychology, 8(2), 100-110.

Dunbar, R. I. M., Marriott, A., & Duncan, N. D. C. (1997). Human conversational behavior. Human Nature, 8(3), 231-246.

Ellwardt, L., Steglich, C., & Wittek, R. (2012). The co-evolution of gossip and friendship in workplace social networks. Social Networks, 34(4), 623-633.

Emler, N. (1990). A social psychology of reputation. European Review of Social Psychology, 1(1), 171-193.

Feinberg, M., Willer, R., & Schultz, M. (2014). Gossip and ostracism promote cooperation in groups. Psychological Science, 25(3), 656-664.

Foster, E. K., & Trivers, R. L. (1976). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 51(1), 35-57.

Grosser, T., Lopez-Kidwell, V., Labianca, G. J., & Ellwardt, L. (2012). Hearing it through the grapevine: Positive and negative workplace gossip. Organizational Dynamics, 41, 52-61.

Kurland, N. B., & Pelled, L. H. (2000). Passing the word: Toward a model of gossip and power in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 25(2), 428-438.

Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1991). Computer-mediated communication, de-individuation and group decision-making. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34(2), 283-301.

McAndrew, F. T., & Milenkovic, M. A. (2002). Of tabloids and family secrets: The evolutionary psychology of gossip 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(5), 1064-1082.

Noon, M., & Delbridge, R. (1993). News from behind my hand: Gossip in organizations. Organization Studies, 14(1), 23-36.

Pearson, C. M., Andersson, L. M., & Wegner, J. W. (2001). When workers flout convention: A study of workplace incivility. Human Relations, 54(11), 1387-1419.

Robbins, M. L., & Karan, A. (2019). Who gossips and how in everyday life?. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(2), 185-195.

Rosnow, R. L., & Fine, G. A. (1976). Rumor and gossip: The social psychology of hearsay. Elsevier.

Stukas, A. A., Bratanova, B., Peters, K., Kashima, Y., & Beatson, R. M. (2010). Confirmatory processes in attitude transmission: The role of shared reality. Social Infulence, 5(2), 101-117. Dunbar, R. I. M. (1993). Coevolution of neocortical size, group size and language in humans. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16(4), 681-694.

Suls, J. M. (1977). Gossip as social comparison. Journal of Communication, 27(1), 164-168.

Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. science, 359(6380), 1146-1151.

Wu, J., Balliet, D., & Van Lange, P. A. (2016). Reputation, gossip, and human cooperation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(6), 350-364.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Oleksandra Balashevych, Olena Orliuk, Alina Proskurnia