Iuliia Paskevska
Lesia Ukrainka Volyn National University
PDF 110-119 (Українська)


coping strategies
staff of penitentiary institutions
professional activity
mental health,
post-traumatic growth
stress resistance
extreme conditions

How to Cite



The article examines the current issue of the psychological resource of the staff of penitentiary institutions, in particular the phenomenon of resilience as the need to resist stress and display mental stability manifested in professional activity. It is emphasized that the professional activity of the staff of penitentiary institutions contains traumatic work situations and is filled with stress factors. The extreme nature of their activities is substantiated, and the process of adaptation of penitentiary staff to extreme working conditions depends on the strength of stressors and stress resistance: the supply of important information and energy resources for overcoming stressful situations. The properties of stress resistance of individuals of an extreme type of profession are summarized: psychophysiological, emotional, cognitive, integrative.
A brief overview of various approaches to the conceptualization and definition of the concept of resilience is presented - as a trait or ability of an individual; as a process and as an adaptive and protective mechanism of the individual. The components of resilience are given: 1) cognitive flexibility and reframing; 2) resourceful emotional states; 3) connection with values, spirituality, meaning of life; 4) effective coping strategies; 5) social competence. It was determined that the advantages of resilience are high adaptability, psychological well-being and success in activities. Attention is also paid to the theoretical and methodological model of resilience, which includes four phases: confrontation with risk factors (traumatic events); activation of protective factors and vulnerability factors; interaction between protective factors and vulnerability factors; possible outcomes: resilience, maladaptation.
The understanding that resilience plays an important role in the ability and formation of post-traumatic growth of penitentiary staff is offered. It has been established that in order to achieve the level of integration of the staff of penitentiary institutions in the selected aspect of adaptation to professional activity, it is necessary to develop successful coping strategies by teaching self-regulation skills and improving the level of stress resistance associated with the level of job satisfaction.

PDF 110-119 (Українська)


Arshava Y.F. (2006). Psykhologiy zdoroviy: navchal. Posibnyk [Psychology of the health: study guide]/ Y.F. Arshava, O.G. Kapshukova. Dnipro: VPK DNU [in Ukraine].

Ahmedilin R.L. (2013). Osnovy oenetenciarnoy psychologiy: uchebn. Posobye [Fundamentals of penitentiary psychology]. Novokuznetck. [in Russia].

Bodrov, V.A. (1995). Psykholohycheskyi stress: razvytye uchenyia y sovremennoe sostoianye problem [Psychological stress: the development of learning and the current state of the problem]. Moskow: YP RAN [in Russia].

Vasyliuk, F.E. (1984). Psykholohyia perezhyvanyia. Analyz preodolenyia krytycheskykh sytuatsyi [Psychology of experience. Analysis of overcoming critical situations]. Moskow: Yzdatelstvo Moskovskoho unyversyteta [in Russia].

Vodopianova, N. E. (2009). Psykhodyahnostyka stressa. [Psychodiagnosis of stress]. St. Petersburg: Pyter [in Russia].

Hrynberh, Dzh. (2002). Upravlenye stressom. [Stress managemen]. St. Petersburg: Pyter. [in Russia].

Dubrovina Y.V. (1991). Shkolnaya psyhologicheskaya sluzhba: voprosy teorii y practiki. [School psychological service: issues of theory and practice]. Moskow: Pedagogika [in Russia].

Dykaia, L.H. (2003). Psykhycheskaia samorehuliatsyia funktsyonalnoho sostoianyia cheloveka [Mental self-regulation of a person’s functional state]. Moskow: YP RAN [in Russia].

Kytaev-Smіk, L.A. (1983). Psykholohyia stressa [Stress psychology]. Moskow: Yzd-vo «NAUKA» [in Russia].

Kohut, O.O. (2019). Stresostiikist ta efektyvna komunikatsiia patrulnykh politseiskykh : naukovo-praktychnyi posibnyk dlia psykholohiv pravookhoronnykh orhaniv. [Stress Resistance and Effective Communication of Patrol Officers: A Practical Guide for Law Enforcement Psychologists]. Krivoy Rog: Donetskyi yurydychnyi instytut MVS Ukrainy [in Ukraine].

Lazos G.P. (2018). Resylyentnyst: konceptualisacya ponyat,lyad suchasnyh doslidgen. [Resilience: conceptualization of concepts, review of modern research.]. Aktualny problem psychology. Konsultativna psyhologya y psyhoterapya: sbyrnyk naukovyh prach Instytutu psyhologyy imeny G.S. Коstyka NAPN Ukraine / sa red. Maksimenko S.D. ІІІ. 14. 26– 64 [in Ukraine].

Leontyev D. (2013). Mnogourovnevaya model vzaymodeystvya s neblagopriyatnymy obstoyatelstvami: ot zachyty k yzmenenyu [A multilevel model of interaction with adverse circumstances: from protection to change] / D/Leontyev// Materyaly III Mezhdunarodniy konferencyy. 258–261 [in Russia].

Maksimenko S.D., Koval І.А., Maksimenko K.A., Papucha М.V. (2008). Medichna psyhologiy. [Medical psychology]. Vinnicha: Nova knyga [in Ukraine].

Morosanova, V.Y. (2001). Yndyvydualnыi styl samorehuliatsyy [Individual style of self-regulation]. Moskow: Yzd-vo «NAUKA» [in Russia].

Sapolsky, Robert. (2015). Psykholohyia stressa. [The psychology of stress]. (3-е изд.). St. Petersburg : Pyter. [in Russia].

Bolton K. (2013). The development and validation of the resilience protective factors inventory: a confirmatory factor analysis /Kristin Whitehall Bolton. University of Texas at Arlington

Bonanno G.A. (2004). Loss, Trauma, and Human Resilience. Have We Underestimated the Human Capacity to Thrive After Extremely Aversive Events? American Psychologist, 59.1. 20-28.

Connor K.M. (2003). Development of a new resilience scale: the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale / K.M. Connor, J. R. Davidson. Depression and Anxiety. 18. 76.

Coutu D. L. (2002). How resilience works. Harvard business review. 80.5. 46-56.

Cutuli J. J., Herbers, J. E., Masten, A. S., & Reed, M. G. J. Resilience in development. (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology. 3rd Edition.

Hellerstein D. (2011). How I can become resilient // Heal Your Brain. Електронний ресурс. – http: / www. heal- your-brain

Ungar M. (2008). Resilience across cultures. The British Journal of Social Work. 38(2), 218-235.

Lepore S.J. (2006). Resilience and posttraumatic growth: Recovery, resistance, and reconfiguration / S. J. Lepore, T. A. Revenson // In L. G. Calhoun, & R. G. Tedeschi (Eds.), Handbook of posttraumatic growth, research and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Routledge. 24–46

Luthar S. S., Cicchetti D., Becker B. (2000). The construct of resilience: a critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child development. 71. 543.

Masten A. (2014). Ordinary magic: resilience in development / Ann Masten. New York: The Gulford press.

Masten A. (2011). Resilience in children threatened by extreme adversity: frameworks for research, practice, and translational synergy / Ann Masten // Developmental Psychopathology. 23. 493–506.

Neman R. (2005). APA’s resilience initiative / R. Neman // Professional psychology: research and practice. 36. 227.

Neenan M. (2017). Developing resilience: A cognitive-behavioural approach. Taylor & Francis.

Richardson, G. E. (1990). The resiliency model / G. E. Richardson, B. Neiger, S. Jensen, K. Kumpfer // Health Education. 21. 33–39

Richardson, G. (2002). The metatheory of resilience and resiliency / Glenn E. Richardson // Journal of clinical Psychology. 58 (3). 307–321. DOI 10.1002 / jclp. 20020.

Sele H. (1992). Stress without distress. Riga: Vyeda.

Southwick S. (2016). Resilience. The Science of Mastering Life`s Greatest Challenges / Steven M. Southwick, Dennis S. Charney. Cambridge University Press.

Wagnild G. M., Young H. M. (1993). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Resilience Scale. Journal of Nursing Measurement. 1. 165

Walker F., Pfingst K., Carnevali L., Sgoifo A., Nalivaiko E. (2017). In the search for integrative biomarker of resilience to psychological stress. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 74. 310-320.

Werner E. (1992). Overcoming the odds: high risk children from birth to adulthood / E. Werner, R. Smith. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright Notice

Articles in the Psychological Journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. For more detailed information, please, fallow the link -