This research continues the methodological discussion between psychoanalytically-oriented therapists and their colleagues, who understand the point, the process and the influence of psychotherapy through a CBT-oriented lens.
The central point of research is the question of connections between psychoanalysis and literature, or even, of psychoanalysis itself as a kind of literature. The key features of a psychoanalysts mode of thinking is to be found in the plane of aesthetics.
It is proposed, that, unlike a CB-therapist, who mainly goes by the rational principles of cognition, a psychoanalyst is prone to experience the reality of psychotherapy in terms of literary aesthetics, and their attempts to verbalize their understanding of the patient is based on a literary perspective. There exists certain similarity between a writers work, as he tries to embody an imaginary character onto a page, and an analysts work, as he tries to incorporate his analytic intuition into a psychodynamic hypothesis and create a psychological portrait of the patient.
Thus, the article is focused on the empirical exploration of therapeutic texts, made by therapists based on viewing an unstructured first-session interview, executed by therapists with different levels of psychotherapeutic education, experience and predisposition to psychoanalytic thinking.
(For measuring said predisposition an adaptation of the Comparative Psychotherapy Process Scale(CPPS) has been carried out, its inner coherence and diagnostic validity have been established.
The results of simultaneous independent criterion-based analysis of the produced texts by literary experts and psychoanalytic supervisors have shown, that the literary aesthetic is an a priory feature of the descriptions of psychoanalysts, and the more so, the higher the analysts therapeutic quality. This does not so much concern the artistic value of the descriptions, but the artistic taste: the ability to distinguish kitsch and artistic form, and the ability to integrate them into new gestalts on basis of sensual harmony. Thus, the evidence supports the claim, that artistic taste is a fundamental feature of a psychoanalysts therapeutic cognition. It is particularly the aesthetic ability of the analyst, which allows for the specific non-goal-oriented approach to his therapeutic influence, which gives room to the development of the true Self according to Winnicott, and further separates the therapeutic process from the goal-oriented therapeutic learning. Thus it is concluded, that the analytic process from the position of aesthetics may fall under the risk of devolving into forms of kitsch practices.
Argelander, H. (1982). Textstruktur und Interpretation [Text structure and interpretation]. Psyche (Stuttg). 1982 Aug;36(8):700-25. German. PMID: 7122914.
Argelander, H. (2013). The scenic function of the ego and its role in symptom and character formation. Int J Psychoanal. 2013 Apr;94(2):337-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-8315.2012.00603.x. PMID: 23560907.
Blagys, MD, Hilsenroth, MJ. (2002). Distinctive activities of cognitive-behavioral therapy. A review of the comparative psychotherapy process literature. Clin Psychol Rev. 2002 Jun;22(5):671-706. doi: 10.1016/s0272-7358(01)00117-9. PMID: 12113201.
Blagys, M. D., & Hilsenroth, M. J. (2000). Distinctive features of short-term psychodynamic-interpersonal psychotherapy: A review of the comparative psychotherapy process literature. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 7(2), 167–188. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.7.2.167
Bollas, C. (1979). The transformational object. Int J Psychoanal. 1979;60(1):97-107. PMID: 457346.
Bollas, C. (1987). The shadow of the object: Psychoanalysis of the unthought known. Columbia University Press.
Broch, H. (1955) Dichten und Erkennen. Essays, Bd. 1, Zurich, Rhein-Verlag
Carbon, C., (2020, April 29). Was unterscheidet kunst von kitsch? [What is the difference between art and kitsch?] Retrieved May 13, 2021, from https://www.spektrum.de/frage/aesthetik-was-unterscheidet-kunst-von-kitsch/1651758?fbclid=IwAR2PNkfPJVgF9-rlGBCTa3T5Epj8CYv3m3u3xygCAWg-HAmmNNGAFa6HOik
Donovan, D.M. (1989). The paraconscious. J Am Acad Psychoanal. 1989 Summer;17(2):223-51. doi: 10.1521/jaap.1.1918.104.22.168. PMID: 2768022.
Gay, P. (1995). Freud: A Life for Our Time. London: Papermac.
Getlein, M. and Howard, A., (2016). Art visionaries. London: Laurence King Publishing.
Gonzalez-Liencres C, Shamay-Tsoory SG, Brüne M. (2013) Towards a neuroscience of empathy: ontogeny, phylogeny, brain mechanisms, context and psychopathology. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Sep;37(8):1537-48. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.05.001. Epub 2013 May 13. PMID: 23680700.
Hall, C. S. (1954). A Primer of Freudian Psychology. New York: A Mentor Book.
Hilsenroth, M. J., Blagys, M. D., Ackerman, S. J., Bonge, D. R., & Blais, M. A. (2005). Measuring Psychodynamic-Interpersonal and Cognitive-Behavioral Techniques: Development of the Comparative Psychotherapy Process Scale. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 42(3), 340–356. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-322.214.171.1240
Kandel, E. R. (2012). The age of insight: The quest to understand the unconscious in art, mind, and brain, from Vienna 1900 to the present. Random House.
Lichtenberg, J.D. (1993). The empathic mode of perception: an update. J Am Acad Psychoanal. 1993 Winter;21(4):485-500. doi: 10.1521/jaap.1.19126.96.36.1995. PMID: 8138454.
Lohmann, H-M. (1998). Sigmund Freud. Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag, Reinbek
Margulies, A. (1993). The empathic imagination: empathy and inscapes. J Am Acad Psychoanal. 1993 Winter;21(4):513-24. doi: 10.1521/jaap.1.19188.8.131.523. PMID: 8138456.
McLaughlin, Maureen & Devoogd, Glenn. (2004). Critical Literacy as Comprehension: Expanding Reader Response. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy - J ADOLESC ADULT LITERACY. 48. 52-62. 10.1598/JAAL.48.1.5.
Meissner, W.W. (1991). What is effective in psychoanalytic therapy: A move from interpretation to relation. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson
Riegl, А. (2004). Historical Grammar of the Visual Arts New York: Zone Books.
Rose G.J.(1993). Affect: a biological basis of art. J Am Acad Psychoanal. 1993 Winter;21(4):501-12. doi: 10.1521/jaap.1.19184.108.40.2061. PMID: 8138455.
Rubin, J.B. (1996). The analyst's authority. J Am Acad Psychoanal. 1996 Fall;24(3):457-83. doi: 10.1521/jaap.1.19220.127.116.117. PMID: 9125705.
Sandler, J., Dare, C. and Holder, A., (1973). The Patient and the Analyst: The Basis of the Psychoanalytic Process. Allen and Unwin.
Stolorow, R.D., Atwood G.E. (2013) The tragic and the metaphysical in philosophy and psychoanalysis. Psychoanal Rev. 2013 Jun;100(3):405-21. doi: 10.1521/prev.2013.100.3.405. PMID: 23638662.
Szajnberg, N.M. (1997). The aesthetic aspects of psychoanalysis. J Am Acad Psychoanal. 1997 Summer;25(2):189-210. doi: 10.1521/jaap.1.1918.104.22.168. PMID: 9395989.
Thomä, H., & Kächele, H. (1987). Psychoanalytic practice. I: Principles. New York: Springer-Verlag
Wittels, F.(1924). Sigmund Freud; der Mann, die Lehre, die Schule [Sigmund Freud, his personality, his teaching, & his school]. Leipzig: Tal.
Сrittenden, E. Brookes. (2005). Meaning as the Validading Principle in Psychodynamic Science. J Am Acad Psychoanal. 2005 Summer; 33(2):275-286.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles in the Psychological Journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. For more detailed information, please, fallow the link - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/