ECOCENTRISM AS A PREREQUISITE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A SOCIALLY MATURE PERSONALITY OF FUTURE SOCIONOMIC SPECIALISTS
Liana Onufriieva
Ivan Ohiіenko National University in Kamianets-Podilskyi
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2442-4601
Oksana Chaikovska
Ivan Ohiіenko National University in Kamianets-Podilskyi
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0799-4987
PDF 44-53 (Українська)

Keywords

ecological consciousness
ecocentrism
ecocentric attitudes
social maturity
social intelligence
ecological development
future specialists in socionomic professions

How to Cite

Onufriieva, L., & Chaikovska, O. (2021). ECOCENTRISM AS A PREREQUISITE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A SOCIALLY MATURE PERSONALITY OF FUTURE SOCIONOMIC SPECIALISTS. PSYCHOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 7(1), 44-53. https://doi.org/10.31108/1.2021.7.1.4

Abstract

The article presents the study on future socionomic specialists’ ecocentrism, describes the structure of ecological consciousness and its psychological characteristics.

Basing on the analyzed theoretical scientific sources, we have determined that environmental consciousness means a sphere of social and individual consciousness, associated with representations of the nature as a part of the whole existence.

According to the obtained data, students with pronounced ecocentric attitudes towards environment are characterized by sociability (high social activity, needs and desires for communications), poise (high tolerance to stress, optimism, high activity, self-confidence), openness (the desire for trustful and open interactions with others, for communications, openness to new experience, high self-criticism), extraversion (sociability, openness, optimism, high activity, friendliness).

We have found that the students with pronounced anthropocentric attitudes towards environment are characterized by irritability (unstable emotional states, a tendency to respond emotionally to life situations), reactive aggressiveness (the desire to dominate, impulsivity of behavior), emotional lability (instability of emotional states, imbalance, irritability, insufficient self-control, frequent and abrupt mood swings) and shyness (low stress resistance, insecurity, anxiety).

The study results prove that the rank indicators of the examined criteria are different, and this demonstrates differences in psychological characteristics of the respondents with different attitudes towards environment. The differences between the majority of the examined criteria were statistically significant (p≤0.01, p≤0.001), which confirmed possible differentiation of students by of their attitudes to environment.

We have proved that expressed different attitudes (ecocentric, apathy or anthropocentric) to environment are not influenced by such psychological characteristics as: orientation in time, neuroticism, spontaneous aggressiveness and depression (p≥0.10). These personal characteristics do not actually influence the formation or transformation of students’ ecological consciousness.

Basing on the experimental study, we have determined correlations between the ecocentrism indicators and the characteristics of future socionomic specialists’ social maturity. Namely, the students with pronounced ecocentric attitudes towards environment showed in interpersonal relationships strong authority and the desire for leadership, acute independence and dominance, excessive straightforwardness, accompanied by criticism and distrust, the tendency to cooperate with pronounced altruism and hypersocial attitudes, high stress resistance, optimism, activity, self-confidence.

 

PDF 44-53 (Українська)

References

Gagarin, A.V. (2005). Prirodoorientirovannaia deiatelnost uchashchikhsia kak usloviie formirovaniia ekologicheskoho soznaniia [Nature-oriented activity of students as a condition for the formation of ecological consciousness]. Doctor’s thesis: Moskva [in Russian].

Yevdokimova, T.O. (2007). Rozvytok ekolohichnoi svidomosti pidlitkiv-uchasnykiv skautskoho rukhu [The development of ecological consciousness of teenagers-participants of the scout movement]. Candidate’s thesis: Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Kairis, E.D. (2005). Psikhologicheskiie kharakteristiki ekologicheskoho soznaniia [Psychological characteristics of ecological consciousness]. Aktualni problemy psykholohii – Actual problems of psychology: Collection of research papers of G.S. Kostiuk Institute of Psychology of NAES of Ukraine, 7 (5), 185–192 [in Russian].

Korol, O.V. (1999). Formuvannia ekolohichnoi kultury uchniv 5-6 klasiv u protsesi vyvchennia intehratyvnoho kursu “Navkolyshnii svit” [The formation of ecological culture of pupils of 5-6 grades in the process of studying the integrative course “Surrounding World”]. Candidate’s thesis: Sumy [in Ukrainian].

Kostiukova, K.V. (2004). Do problemy ekolohichnosti seredovyshcha rozvytku ta formuvannia zriloi osobystosti [The problem of ecological environment of development and formation of mature personality]. Aktualni problemy psykholohii – Actual problems of psychology: Collection of research papers of G.S. Kostiuk Institute of Psychology of NAES of Ukraine, 7 (2), 132–137 [in Ukrainian].

Moliako, V.O. (2010). Psykholohichni naslidky Chornobylskoi katastrofy [Psychological consequences of the Chernobyl disaster]. Aktualni problemy psykholohii – Actual problems of psychology: Collection of research papers of G.S. Kostiuk Institute of Psychology of NAES of Ukraine, (Vol. 12). Problems of psychology of creativity, (pp. 8–21): Zhytomyr [in Ukrainian].

Markov, Yu.G. (2004). Sotsialnaia ekologiia. Vzaimodeistviie obshchestva i prirody [Social ecology. The interaction of society and nature]. Novosibirsk: Sibirskoie universitetskoie izdatelstvo [in Russian].

Medvedev, V.I., & Aldasheva, A.A. (2001). Ekologicheskoie soznaniie [Ecological consciouness]. Moskva: Logos [in Russian].

Skrebets, V.O. (2006). Osoblyvosti ekolohichnoi svidomosti v umovakh naslidkiv tekhnohennoi katastrofy [The features of ecological consciousness in the conditions of consequences of man-caused disaster]. Doctor’s thesis: Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Shvalb, Yu.M. (2005). Ekoloho-psykholohichni vymiry sposoby zhyttia [Ecological and psychological dimensions of lifestyle]. Aktualni problemy psykholohii – Actual problems of psychology: Collection of research papers of G.S. Kostiuk Institute of Psychology of NAES of Ukraine, 7, Issue 5 (2), 294–301 [in Ukrainian].

Yasvin, V.A. (2000). Psikhologiia otnosheniia k prirode [Psychology of relationship to nature]. Moskva: Smysl [in Russian].

Kobets, O., Pavelkiv, R., Melnychuk, T., Onufriieva, L., & Chaikovska, O. (2020). Social Intelligence as a Factor of Volunteer Activities by Future Medical Workers. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 9 (1), 84–95. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v9i1.2536

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright Notice

Articles in the Psychological Journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. For more detailed information, please, fallow the link - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/