PSYCHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS’ TYPES DEFINED BY CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN THEIR INTEGRATED PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDITY ATTRIBUTES
Fedir Podshyvailov
LLC «Taylor Nelson Sofres Ukraine»
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0142-6172
Lidia Podshyvailova
Boris Grinchenko University in Kyiv
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2902-3586
Maria Shepeliova
H. S. Kostiuk Institute of Psychology, the NAES of Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3293-4997
PDF 61-84 (Українська)

Keywords

personality
individity
attributes of personality
attributes of individity
typology of students
educational surrounding

How to Cite

Podshyvailov, F., Podshyvailova, L., & Shepeliova, M. (2020). PSYCHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS’ TYPES DEFINED BY CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN THEIR INTEGRATED PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDITY ATTRIBUTES. PSYCHOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 6(7), 61-84. https://doi.org/10.31108/1.2020.6.7.6

Abstract

The performed theoretical analyses allowed us to define the attributes of a personality as a social display of a person, and the attributes of an individity as a social display of an individual.  The personality attributes are: 1) sociability; 2) curiosity; 3) empathy; 4) creative curiosity; 5) aesthetic sensibility (as conscientious sociability); 6) sensitive empathy; 7) creativity; 8) sensitivity; 9) conscientious. The attributes of individity are: 1) psychotism; 2) mental imbalance; 3) disinhibition; 4) dominance tendency (as a neurotic psychotism); 5) depression (as an emotional insensibility of mental imbalance; 6) risk inclination; 7) emotional insensibility; 8) asociality; 9) neuroticism. In addition, the integral indicator of personality is aesthetic sensibility, and the integral indicator of individity is depression. The generalized analyses of the performed empiric research on modern students’ peculiarities allowed us to define students’ types depending on correspondence between their integral personality and individity attributes. Four types were distinguished: I type «+ +» (31,8%) consists of students with high aesthetic sensibility and  deep depression (named “Avatarity”); II type  «– +» (17,4%) consists of students with low aesthetic sensibility and deep depression (named “Individity”); III type «– –» (25,2%) includes students with  low aesthetic sensibility and slight depression (conditionally named “Vitality”); IV type «+ –» (25,6%) consists of students with high aesthetic sensibility and slight depression (actually the “Personality” type). Basing on the revealed differences between students by the correspondence of their aesthetic sensibility and depression, we presented the extended characteristic of each type with the studied psychological indicators describing the above mentioned attributes (dispersion analyses and U-criterion of Mann-Whitney was uses). Thus, the I type is characterized by: neuroticism, conscientious, introversion, imagination, abulia (as a psychotic neuroticism), sensitivity (and its lower order component– femininity), mental imbalance, shyness, psychotism.  The II type is characterized by: psychotism, mental imbalance, dominance tendency, emotional insensibility, neuroticism. The III type is characterized by: psychotism, mental imbalance, sensitive empathy, femininity, sociability (and its lower order component – general activity), sensitivity, shyness, conscientious, neuroticism. The IV type is characterized by: sociability (and its lower order component– general activity), sensitive empathy, creativity (and its lower order components – complexity and imagination), sensitivity (and its lower order component – femininity), conscientious.

 

PDF 61-84 (Українська)

References

Afhami & Mohammadi-Zarghan (2018). The Big Five, Aesthetic Judgment Styles, and Art Interest. Europe's Journal of Psychology, Vol. 14(4), 764–775, doi:10.5964/ejop.v14i4.1479 [in English]

Boiko, V. V. (1996) Energiia emotcii v obshchenii: vzgliad na sebia i drugikh [Emotions energy in communication: the look at oneself and others]. M.: «Filin», 472 p. [in Russian]

Castro Solano & Cosentino (2019). The High Five Model: Associations of the High Factors With Complete Mental Well-Being and Academic Adjustment in University Students. Europe's Journal of Psychology, Vol. 15(4), 656–670, https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i4.1759 [in English]

Cosentino, A. C., & Castro Solano, A. (2017). The High Five: Associations of the five positive factors with the Big Five and well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 1250. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01250 [in English]

Dvoretckii, I. Kh. (2005) Latinsko-russkii slovar [Latin-Russian dictionary]. M.: Russkii iazyk – Media, 843 p.

Joyner, Rhodes, & Loprinzi (2018). The Prospective Association Between the Five Factor Personality Model With Health Behaviors and Health Behavior Clusters. Europe's Journal of Psychology, Vol. 14(4), 880–896, doi:10.5964/ejop.v14i4.1450 [in English]

Kajonius & Johnson (2019) Assessing the Structure of the Five Factor Model of Personality (IPIP-NEO-120) in the Public Domain. Europe's Journal of Psychology. Vol. 15(2), 260–275, https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i2.1671 [in English]

Melnikov, V. M. & Iampolskii, L. T. (1985) Vvedenie v eksperimentalnuiu psikhologiiu lichnosti [Introduction to the experimental psychology of personality]. M. : Prosveshchenie,. 319 p. [in Russian]

Miuller, V. K. (2009) Novyi Bolshoi Anglo-russkii slovar [New English-Russian Dictionary]. М: Alta-Print, 864 p.

Moliako V. O. (2008) Metodolohichni ta teoretychni problemy doslidzhennia tvorchoi diialnosti [Mehodological and theoretical aspects of creative activity]. Stratehii tvorchoi diialnosti: shkola V. O. Moliako [The strategies of creative activity: V. O. Moliako’s school]. K., P. 7–53.

Oxford Dictionary of English, 3rd Edition. Oxford University Press, 2010. 2112 р.

Podshivajlov, F. M. (2015) To the potentiality of students’ typology creation by the criterion of academic motivation. Science and Education a New Dimension. Pedagogy and Psychology. Budapest. Issue 59, ІIІ (30). P. 69–72. [in English]

Podshyvailov, F. M. (2014) Sootnoshenie motivatcii dostizheniia uspekha i motivatcii izbeganiia neudach: ot bipoliarnosti v teorii k kvadripoliarnosti na praktike [Correlation between motivation of success achievement and motivation of failure avoidance: from bipolarity in theory to quadripolarіty on practice]. Aktualni problemy psykholohii: Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Instytutu psykholohii imeni H. S. Kostiuka NAPN Ukrainy – Actual problems of psychology: scientific works collection of the H. S. Kostiuk Institute of psychology of NAES of Ukraine. K.: Vydavnytstvo «Feniks», Vol. XII. Psykholohiia tvorchosti. Issue. 20, P. 284–293 [in Ukrainian].

Podshyvailov, F. M. (2018) Psykholohichna kharakterystyka typiv osobystosti za pokaznykom motyvatsii dosiahnennia [The personality types’ psychological description by the indicator of success achievement motivation]. Aktualni problemy psykholohii: Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Instytutu psykholohii imeni H. S. Kostiuka NAPN Ukrainy – Actual problems of psychology: scientific works collection of the H. S. Kostiuk Institute of psychology of NAES of Ukraine. K. – Nizhyn: PP Lysenko, Vol. IX. Zahalna psykholohiia. Istoriia psykholohii. Etnichna psykholohiia. Issue 11. 142–162. [in Ukrainian]

Podshyvailov, F. M. (2019) Poysk synerhetycheskykh эffektov vzaymodeistvyia systemoobrazuiushchykh parametrov akademycheskoi odarёnnosty [Searching of synergetic effects of academic giftedness system-forming parameters’ interaction]. Aktualni problemy psykholohii: Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Instytutu psykholohii imeni H. S. Kostiuka NAPN Ukrainy – Actual problems of psychology: scientific works collection of the H. S. Kostiuk Institute of psychology of NAES of Ukraine. K.: Vydavnytstvo «Feniks»,. Vol. XII. Psykholohiia tvorchosti. Issue. 26, 262–276. [in Ukrainian]

Podshyvailov, F. M., Podshyvailov, M. M., Podshyvailova, L. Y. & Podshyvailova, A. M. (2018) Rol matematycheskoho metoda v yssledovanyy fyloloho-psykholohycheskoi realnosty [The role of mathematical method in filological-psychological reality research]. Osvita ta rozvytok obdarovanoi osobystosti – Education and development of a gifted personality. Kyiv: Instytut obdarovanoi dytyny NAPN Ukrainy, № 2 (69), 17–22. [in Russian]

Podshyvailova, L. I. & Shepelova, M. V. (2020) Osobystist studenta yak indykator osvitnoho seredovyshcha suchasnoi Ukrainy [A student’s personality as an indicator

of the modern Ukrainian educational surrounding]. Aktualni problemy psykholohii: Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Instytutu psykholohii imeni H. S. Kostiuka NAPN Ukrainy – Actual problems of psychology: scientific works collection of the H. S. Kostiuk Institute of psychology of NAES of Ukraine. K.: Vydavnytstvo «Feniks», Vol. XII. Psykholohiia tvorchosti. Issue. 27, P. 220-236. [in Ukrainian]

Podshyvailova, L. I. & Shepelova, M. V. (2020) Typolohiia studentiv za spivvidnoshenniam intehralnykh vlastyvostei osobystosti ta indyvidnosti [Students’ typology on the correlation between integral attributes of personality and individity]. Psykholohichnyi i pedahohichnyi dyskurs: naukovi zapysky vchenykh : zbirnyk materialiv konferentsii – Psychological and pedagogical discourse: scientific notes of scientists : the conference materials collection. Kyiv : Vyd-vo NPU imeni M. P. Drahomanova, P. 150-152. [in Ukrainian]

Psikhodiagnosticheskii test (PDT) V. Melnikova, L. Iampolskogo (2002) [Psychodiagnostical test of Melnikov, L. Iampolsky]. Praktikum po psikhodiagnostike lichnosti [Tutorial on psychology of personality]. Eds. N. K. Rakovich. Minsk, P.75-91. [in English]

Psykholohichnyi slovnyk (1982) [Psychological dictionary]. Еds. V. I. Voitko. K.: «Vyshcha shkola», 216 p. [in Ukrainian]

Shepelova, M. V. (2019) The personality characteristics in students’ artistic activity / Technologies of intellect development. Vol. 3, № 3(24). [Electronic journal]. URL: http://psytir.org.ua/index.php/technology_intellect_develop/article/view/460 DOI: http://doi.org/10.31108/3.2019.3.3.5 [in English]

Tunik, E. E. (2003) Modifitcirovannye kreativnye testy Viliamsa [Modificated creative Williams tests]. SPb.: Rech, 96 p. [in Russian]

Ushakov, D. N. (2007) Bolshoi tolkovyi slovar sovremennogo russkogo iazyka [Big worldbook of modern russian language]. Eds. Iu. I. Semenetc. M.: Alta-Print. 1239 p. [in Russian]

Williams F. E. (1980) Creativity Assesment Packet (CAP). D.O.C. Publisers. Inc. Buffalo. New York 14214. [in English]

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright Notice

Articles in the Psychological Journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. For more detailed information, please, fallow the link - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/