CLINICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE LIMITED RESPONSIBILITY TO “UNDERSTAND, EVALUATE AND MAKE DECISIONS” IN THE CIVIL PROCESS
PDF 283-296 (Українська)

Keywords

psychological assessment
limited responsibilitу
limited legal responsibility
civil process
psychodiagnostics
psychological examination

How to Cite

Zaviazkina, N. (2018). CLINICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE LIMITED RESPONSIBILITY TO “UNDERSTAND, EVALUATE AND MAKE DECISIONS” IN THE CIVIL PROCESS. PSYCHOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 4(5), 283–296. https://doi.org/10.31108/1.2018.5.15.18

Abstract

Growing demands for substantiating expert opinions, and dynamic changes in legislation, dictate the need for create an integrated system that would facilitate the unification of modern and traditional principles of diagnosing mental disorders with the principles of forensic expert activity using modern methods of psychological diagnosis.

One of the most important tasks during the examinations in the civil process is the development of diagnostic criteria for limited legal capacity, the establishment of its "lower" and "upper" boundaries. This is especially important in view of the fact that the partial possibility of a limitedly capable citizen to be responsible (to understand the meaning of one's own actions and the need to fulfill obligations, the ability to retain them in memory, the ability to perform actions under external regulations on the part of the trustee) is one of the significant grounds for differentiation of the limited incapacity and incapacity.

In the course of the research it was proved that the growing demands for substantiating expert opinions, and dynamic changes in legislation, dictate the need for create a integrated system that would facilitate the unification of modern and traditional principles of diagnosing mental disorders with the principles of forensic expert activity using modern methods of psychological diagnosis.

Important questions in the methodological approaches in forensic expertology in the civil process are, firstly, the issue of the legislative framework: the subject, the object, the grounds and the order of appointment and the general principles of conducting expert research. Secondly, the consideration of general principles of forensic expert activity of psychologists: stages and methods of expert research with observance of all requirements, psychological diagnosis of mental disorders and the establishment of pathopsychological register-syndromes, establishing the correlation between medical and legal criteria.

Analyzed data suggest that to assess the ability of the subject to understand the significance of their actions and the ability to predict and manage such actions, it is necessary to identify several criteria: the degree of manifestation of changes in cognitive functions, the degree of expression of changes in the emotional-volitional and motivational sphere, the violation of prognostic and critical functions.

 

https://doi.org/10.31108/1.2018.5.15.18
PDF 283-296 (Українська)

References

Первомайский В. Б., Илейко В.Р. Судебно-психиатрическая экспертиза: от теории к практике К.: КИТ, 2006. - 394 с.

Сєргєєв О. П., Толстой Ю.К. Гражданское право Учебник: в 3 т. Том 1: - 6-е изд., перераб. и доп. / под ред. Сергеева А. П., Толстого Ю. К. - М. : ТК Велби, Изд-во Проспект, 2005. - 776 с.

Шостакович Б. В. Основы судебной психиатрии. Учебное пособие для юристов. М., Издательский дом ГУ ВШЭ, 2005.

Ратинов А. Р. Социально-психологические аспекты юридической теории и практики / А.Р.Ратинов // Прикладная социальная психология. – М.: Наука, 1981. –С.213.

Ломов Б. Ф. Методологические и теоретические проблемы психологии / Ломов Б.Ф. – М.: Наука, 1984. – 444с.

Шостакович Б. В., Ревенок А. Д. Психиатрическая экспертиза в гражданском процессе. - Киев: Здоров’я, 1992. - 184 с.

Ткаченко А. А. Экспертное судебно-психиатрическое исследование: подготовительная и аналитическая стадии. // Российский психиатрический журнал. - 2005. - № 3. - С. 44-50.

Корзун Д. Н., Ткаченко А.А. Судебно-психиатрическая оценка механизмов принятия юридически значимых решений // Рос. психиатр. журн. - 2013. - № 1. - С. 11-17. 14.

Кудрявцев И. А. Судебная психолого-психиатрическая экспертиза. — М.: Юрид. лит., 1988. — 224 с.

Костицький М. В. Судебно-психологическая экспертиза. Монография / Костицкий М.В. - Львов: Вища шк., 1987. - 140 c.

Марчук А. І. Судова психіатрія: навч.посібник / А.І.Марчук.- К.: Атіка, 2004. – 240с.

Леонтьєв О. М., Деятельность, сознание, личность. М.: Политиздат, 1975. – 304 с.

Братусь Б. С. Аномалии личности.— М.: Мысль, 1988.- 301 с.

References (Transliteration):

Pervomajskij V. B., Ilejko V.R. Sudebno-psihiatricheskaya ehkspertiza: ot teorii k praktike K.: KIT, 2006. - 394 s.

Sergeev O. P., Tolstoj YU.K. Grazhdanskoe pravo Uchebnik: v 3 t. Tom 1: - 6-e izd., pererab. i dop. / pod red. Sergeeva A. P., Tolstogo YU. K. - M. : TK Velbi, Izd-vo Prospekt, 2005. - 776 s.

Shostakovich B. V. Osnovy sudebnoj psihiatrii. Uchebnoe posobie dlya yuristov. M., Izdatel'skij dom GU VSHEH, 2005.

Ratinov A. R. Social'no-psihologicheskie aspekty yuridicheskoj teorii i praktiki / A.R.Ratinov // Prikladnaya social'naya psihologiya. – M.: Nauka, 1981. –S.213.

Lomov B. F. Metodologicheskie i teoreticheskie problemy psihologii / Lomov B.F. – M.: Nauka, 1984. – 444s.

Shostakovich B. V., Revenok A. D. Psihiatricheskaya ehkspertiza v grazhdanskom processe. - Kiev: Zdorov’ya, 1992. - 184 s.

Tkachenko A. A. Ehkspertnoe sudebno-psihiatricheskoe issledovanie: podgotovitel'naya i analiticheskaya stadii. // Rossijskij psihiatricheskij zhurnal. - 2005. - № 3. - S. 44-50.

Korzun D. N., Tkachenko A.A. Sudebno-psihiatricheskaya ocenka mekhanizmov prinyatiya yuridicheski znachimyh reshenij // Ros. psihiatr. zhurn. - 2013. - № 1. - S. 11-17. 14.

Kudryavcev I. A. Sudebnaya psihologo-psihiatricheskaya ehkspertiza. — M.: YUrid. lit., 1988. — 224 s.

Kostic'kij M.V. Sudebno-psihologicheskaya ehkspertiza. Monografiya / Kostickij M.V. - L'vov: Vishcha shk., 1987. - 140 c.

Marchuk A. І. Sudova psihіatrіya: navch.posіbnik / A.І.Marchuk.- K.: Atіka, 2004. – 240s.

Leont'еv O. M., Deyatel'nost', soznanie, lichnost'. M.: Politizdat, 1975. – 304 s.,

Bratus' B. S. Anomalii lichnosti.— M.: Mysl', 1988.- 301 s.

Copyright Notice

Articles in the Psychological Journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. For more detailed information, please, fallow the link - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/