The article makes an attempt to determine the psychological factors contributing to development and formation of personal autonomy as it understood in the theory of psychological well-being.
Different personal characteristics influence an individual’s personal autonomy depending on its level. The self-attitude characteristics are in line with personal autonomy; this means that the higher these characteristics are, the higher personal autonomy is. In other words, if an individual believes in his/her own strengths, abilities, energy, independence, in his/her ability to control own life and be self-consistent, self-understanding, if an individual think on him/herself as a confident, independent, strong-willed and reliable person who knows that he/she has something to be respected, he/she also regard him/herself as an autonomous person to the same degree. Low indicators of the Inner-Directed scale show that an individual tends to be dependent on people and situation. So, the desire to get rid of such tendency is the first step to real autonomy. The high levels of autonomy do not influenced by the Inner-Directed indicator, because the problem of dependence is already solved by highly autonomous person. Psychological hardiness, as an individual’s ability to overcome difficulties and turn a stressful situation into prospects for personal growth, can regarded as the base for autonomy development, but it cannot stipulate further development of personal autonomy at attainment of some level.
The performed analysis show that the respondents with high autonomy show better understanding of their meanings of life, their life goal are clearer, they believe that are able to achieve life tasks and goals, which is uncharacteristic for the respondents with average and low personal autonomy. And namely this is a turning point to attain personal autonomy of the higher that average level. We can argue that existing life goals and awareness on own life path create a psychological superstructure allowing an individual to achieve high personal autonomy and experience full-fledged psychological well-being.
Aleshina Yu.E., Gozman L.Ya., Zagika M.V. et al. (1995) Samoaktualizacionnyj test [Self-actualization test]. Moskow: Ross. ped. agencvo, 42 p. [in Russian]
Baranauskienė I., Serdiuk L., Chykhantsova O. (2016) Psychological characteristics of school-leavers’ hardiness at their professional self-determination. Social welfare: interdisciplinary approach. No 6(2), P.64-73 DOI: 10.21277/sw.v2i6.275
Berne E. (2002) Games People Play: the Psychology of Human Relations [M.Budynina trans], Moskow: EKSMO, 314 p. [in Russian]
Dolan P., Layard R., Metcalfe R. (2011) Measuring subjective wellbeing for public policy: recommendations on measures. Centre for Economic Performance special papers. Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
Frankl, V. (1990) Zur mimischen Bejahung und Verneinung.(trans. into Russian) Moscow: Progress, 386 p. [in Russian]
Leontev D.A. (1992). Test smyslozhizennyh orientacij [Test of meaningful life orientations]. Moscow: Smysl. 18 p. [in Russian]
Leontev D.A. (2007) Fenomen svobody: ot voli k avtonomii lichnosti [The phenomenon of freedom: from the will to an individual’s autonomy]. In: Only unique is global. Coll. articles in the honour of the 60th anniversary of G.L. Tulchinsky. SanktPeterburgb .: SPbGUKI. P. 64-89 [in Russian]
Leontev D.A., Rasskazova E. (2006). Test psihologicheskoj zhiznestokosti [Test of psychological hardiness]. Moscow: Smysl. 63 p. [in Russian]
Maddi (2002) The Story of Hardiness: Twenty Years of Theorizing, Research and Practice. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research. Summer 2002. P. 173-185
Nartova-Bochaver S.K. (2005) Psihologicheskoe prostranstvo lichnosti [Psychological space of a personality]. Moscow: Prometheus. 312 p. [in Russian]
Pavlyuk M.M. (2015) Samostіjnіst' majbutnіh fahіvcіv: vitoki stanovlennja ta perspektivi cіlesprjamovanogo rozvitku [Independence of future specialists: the origins of formation and the prospects of purposeful development]. Aktualni problemy psyhologii. Vol. 9, No.6. P. 37-44. [in Ukrainian]
Riesman D., Denney R., Glazer N. (2001) The Lonely Crowd: A Study of the Changing American. Yale University Press; 2nd Edition
Ryff C.D. (1989) Beyond Ponce de Leon and Life Satisfaction: New Directions in Quest of Successful Ageing. International journal of behavioral development. No 12 (1) 35-55
Ryff, C. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. No 69, 719-727.
Seifert, T. A. (2005). The Ryff scales of psychological well-being. Assessment Notes. Center of inquiry at Wabash College.
Sergeeva O.A. (2007) Psihologo-pedagogicheskie uslovija razvitija avtonomii lichnosti v processe podgotovki studentov-psihologov [Psychological and pedagogical conditions of personal development at university training of students-psychologists]: author’s summary …. . on PhD degree in Psychol. Sciences. 19.00.12. Astrakhan. 26 p. [in Russian]
Stolin V., Pantileev S. (1988). Oprosnik samootnoshenija [Self-Attitude Questionnaire]. In: Workshop on psychological diagnostics: psychodiagnostic materials, Moscow: Moscow University Publishing House. P. 123-130. [in Russian]
Young R. (1986) Personal Autonomy: Beyond Negative and Positive Liberty. London: Routledge - https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315203348
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles in the Psychological Journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. For more detailed information, please, fallow the link - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/