LIBERTY AND RESPONSIBILITY AT SELF-REALIZATION OF TEACHING STAFF
Liudmyla Moskovets
Ivan Ziaziun Institute of Pedagogical Education for Adults, the National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8960-477X
PDF 152-168 (Українська)

Keywords

liberty
positive liberty
responsibility
internality
autonomy
personal self-realization

How to Cite

Moskovets, L. (2019). LIBERTY AND RESPONSIBILITY AT SELF-REALIZATION OF TEACHING STAFF. PSYCHOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 5(12), 152-168. https://doi.org/10.31108/1.2019.5.12.10

Abstract

The article presents the key results of the performed theoretical analysis of such phenomena as liberty and responsibility and their importance for teaching staff’s self-realization. Positive and negative liberty is differentiated. The performed theoretical research pays special attention to the ideas of E. Fromm and V. Frankl on the role of liberty for individuation. The essence of autonomy as a notion relevant to liberty and facilitating decision-making in different spheres of human life is defined. The levels, phases, directions and criteria of responsibility development are determined. Internality (internal locus of control) as a notion closely connected to responsibility is interpreted. The article author states that positive liberty manifests itself in conscious activities that involve personal decision-making to overcome obstacles for harmonic revealing of potential abilities based on personal positive values, as well as personal activity restrictions and limitations. Consequently, all this will facilitate and promote self-realization. Liberty can be a driving force for personal activities and provides capabilities to resolve different individual controversies and to prove personal maturity. The following interlink of liberty and responsibility as the philosophic and psychological categories was defined: liberty without responsibility is converted into high-handedness, while responsibility, in its turn, is connected with making willed decisions by an individual and finding the ways to implement them. The following contribution into the determination of the role and place of liberty and responsibility in personal self-realization was made: the first category is a structural element of the activity component manifested in deeds and decisions, while the second one is the condition ensuring successful realization of person’s positive nature and character features.

The role of liberty and responsibility in teaching staff’s self-realization process is studied. Freedom of choice provides the elderly pedagogues with great opportunity to move towards their self-realization. They can take their own decisions whether to continue their professional work or to turn to another activities such as public, socially beneficial, volunteering efforts, etc.

 

PDF 152-168 (Українська)

References

Abulhanova-Slavskaya, K. A. (1991). Strategiya zhizni [Life Strategy]. Moskva: Myisl [in Russian].

Bazyl, L. O. (2017). Realizatsiia pedahohichnoi svobody vchytelia v umovakh reformuvannia osvitnoi haluzi [Teacher’s Pedagogical Liberty Realization in Terms of Education Sector Reform]. Retrieved from http://conf.kubg.edu.ua/index.php/courses/preschool/paper/view/140 [in Ukrainian].

Bayluk, V. V. (2011). Chelovekoznanie. Samorealizatsiya lichnosti: obschie zakonyi uspeha [Study of Human Nature. Personality Self-realization: Common Success Strategies]. Ekaterinburg: Ural. gos. ped. un-t. Retrieved from https://rucont.ru/file.ashx?guid=2d710068-17c0-4eac-aa0f-56bf415742b2 [in Russian].

Ball, H. O. (2003). Vnutrishnia svoboda osoby i osobystisna nadiinist u konteksti humanizatsii osvity [Person’s Internal Liberty and Personality Reliability within the Context of Education Humanization]. Praktychna psykholohiia ta sotsialna robota – Practical Psychology and Social Work, 9, 1-7 [in Ukrainian].

Bekh, I. D. (1998). Osobystisno zoriientovane vykhovannia [Personality-centered Education]. Kyiv: IZMN [in Ukrainian].

Bekh, I. D. (2017). Samorealizatsiia osobystosti yak vyznachalnyi chynnyk yii zhyttiediialnosti [Personality Self-realization as the Determining Criterion of Their Living]. Bahatovymirnist osobystosti: teoriia, psykhodiahnostyka, korektsiia. Zb. nauk. prats za materialamy Vseukr. nauk.-prakt. seminaru z mizhnar. uchastiu – Personality Multidimensionality: Theory, Psychodiagnostics, Psychological Treatment. (рр. 31-36). Poltava: PNPU imeni V. H. Korolenka. Retrieved from http://dspace.pnpu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/7947/1/10.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Busel, V. T. (Eds.). (2004). Velykyi tlumachnyi slovnyk suchasnoi ukrainskoi movy [Big Monolingual Dictionary of Modern Ukrainian]. Kyiv; Irpin: VTF «Perun» [in Ukrainian].

Druzhinin, V. N. (2007). Psihologiya semi [Family Psychology]. Sankt-Peterburg: Piter [in Russian].

Kovalenko, O. H. (2015). Mizhosobystisne spilkuvannia osib pokhyloho viku: psykholohichni aspekty [Elderly People’s Interpersonal Communication: Psychological Aspect]. Kyiv: Instytut obdarovanoi dytyny [in Ukrainian].

Kuzmina, E. Y. (2007). Psihologiya svobodyi: teoriya i praktika [Liberty Psychology: Theory and Practice]. Sankt-Peterburg: Piter. Retrieved from https://cutt.ly/8enqU1H [in Russian].

Kuzmina, E. Y. (2016). Svoboda tvorchestva i determinizm [Creation Liberty and Determinism]. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya Akmeologiya obrazovaniya. Psihologiya razvitiya – Izvestiya of Saratov University. New Series. Series: Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 1 (17), 21-34. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/svoboda-tvorchestva-i-determinizm [in Russian].

Leontev, D. A. (2010). Lichnost v nepredskazuemom mire [Personality in Unpredictable World]. Metodologiya i istoriya psihologii – Methodology and History of Psychology, 5, 120-140. Retrieved from http://mhp-journal.ru/rus/2010_v5_n3_08 [in Russian].

Lifarieva, N. V. (2003). Psykholohiia osobystosti [Personality Psychology]. Kyiv: Tsentr navchalnoi literatury [in Ukrainian].

Maksymenko, S. D. & Osodlo, V. I. (2010). Struktura ta osobystisni determinanty profesiinoi samorealizatsii subiekta [Structure and Personal Factors of Subject’s Professional Realization] S. D. Maksymenko (Eds.), Problemy suchasnoi psykholohii: Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Kamianets-Podilskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Ivana Ohiienka, Instytutu psykholohii im. H. S. Kostiuka APN Ukrainy – Problems of Modern Psychology. (Vol. 8), (рр. 3-19). Kamianets-Podilskyi: Aksioma [in Ukrainian].

Maksymenko, S. D. (Eds.). (2013). Psykholohichni chynnyky samodeterminatsii osobystosti v osvitnomu prostori [Psychological Factors of Personality Self-determination in Educational Space]. Kirovohrad: Imeks-LTD [in Ukrainian].

Ministerstvo osvity i nauky Ukrainy. (2016). Nova ukrainska shkola [New Ukrainian School]. Retrieved from https://mon.gov.ua/storage/app/media/zagalna%20serednya/nova-ukrainska-shkola-compressed.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Ovcharenko, N. V. (2015). Osoblyvosti metodolohii analizu filosofsko-osvitnoho zmistu poniattia «samorealizatsiia osobystosti» [Features of methodology analysis of the philosophical-educational content of the concept of “self-identity”]. Hileia: naukovyi visnyk – Hylea: Scientific Bulletin, 92, 269-273. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/gileya_2015_92_67 [in Ukrainian].

Olport, H. V. (1998). Lichnost v psihologii [Personality in Psychology]. (Y. Yu. Avіdon, Trans). Moskva: «KSP+», Sankt-Peterburg: «Yuventa» [in Russian].

Panok, V. H. & Rud, H. V. (2006). Psykholohiia zhyttievoho shliakhu osobystosti [Psychology of Personality Life Journey]. Kyiv: Nika-Tsentr [in Ukrainian].

Romenets, V. A. & Manokha, I. P. (2003). Istoriia psykholohii [History of Psychology]. Kyiv: Lybid [in Ukrainian].

Samodryn, A. P. (2019). Arkhitektonika profilnoi osvity [Architectonics of Field-specific Education]. Kremenchuk: PP Shcherbatykh O. V. [in Ukrainian].

Sakharova, V. H. (2003). Otvetsvennost kak lichnostnyiy faktor i vozmozhnosti ee diagnostiki [Responsibility as Personality Factor and Its Diagnostics Possibilities]. Dissertation abstract. Khabarovsk. Retrieved from http://irbis.gnpbu.ru/Aref_2003/Saharova_V_G_2003.pdf [in Russian].

Slobodchikov, V. I., & Isaev, E. I. (1995). Osnovyi psihologicheskoy antropologii. Psihologiya cheloveka: Vvedenie v psihologiyu sub'ektivnosti [Foundations of Psychological Anthropoly. Human Psychology: Introduction into Subjectivity Psychology]. Moskva: Shkola-Press [in Russian].

Stepanov, O. M. ((Eds.). (2006). Psykholohichna entsyklopediia [Psychological Encyclopedia].

Tytarenko, T. M. (2014). Narysy do sotsialno-psykholohichnoi teorii osobystisnoho zhyttiekonstruiuvannia [Sketches of the personal life-designing theory]. Psykholohichni nauky: problemy i zdobutky – Psychological Sciences: problems and achievements, 5, 172-186. Retrieved from https://cutt.ly/Ke1rNhO [in Ukrainian].

Frankl, V. (1990). Chelovek v poiskah smyisla [A Human in Search of Sense]. L. Ya. Hozmana & D. A. Leonteva (Eds.). Moskva: Prohress. Retrieved from https://imwerden.de/pdf/frankl_chelovek_v_poiskakh_smysla_1990.pdf [in Russian].

Hell, L. & Zigler, D. (2003). Teorii lichnosti [Personality Theories]. Sankt-Peterburg: Piter [in Russian].

Shapar, V. B. (2004). Psykholohichnyi tlumachnyi slovnyk [Psychological Glossary]. Kharkiv: Prapor [in Ukrainian].

Shynkaruk, V. I. (Eds.). (1986). Filosofskyi slovnyk [Philosophical Dictionary]. Kyiv: Holov. red. URE [in Ukrainian].

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright Notice

Articles in the Psychological Journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. For more detailed information, please, fallow the link - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/