THE CHARACTERISTICS OF STRESS TOLERANCE OF MARRIED AND UNMARRIED PEOPLE, DEPENDING ON THEIR ATTITUDE TO LONELINESS
Edyard Psiadlo
Odesa I. I. Mechnikov National University
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1263-3249
Larysa Shragina
National Polytechnic University in Odessa
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0517-9030
Olena Vishtalenko
Odesa I. I. Mechnikov National University
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0815-5483
Vitaliy Lukashin
Odesa I. I. Mechnikov National University
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8627-929X
PDF 46-63 (Русский)

Keywords

psychological hardiness
coping behaviour
coping strategies
joint (dyadic) coping
loneliness
married and unmarried people

How to Cite

Psiadlo, E., Shragina, L., Vishtalenko, O., & Lukashin, V. (2019). THE CHARACTERISTICS OF STRESS TOLERANCE OF MARRIED AND UNMARRIED PEOPLE, DEPENDING ON THEIR ATTITUDE TO LONELINESS. PSYCHOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 5(10), 46-63. https://doi.org/10.31108/1.2019.5.10.4

Abstract

The article discusses the problem of an individual’s psychological hardiness, stress tolerance, loneliness, coping strategies used by people to overcome difficult life situations; the characteristics of stress tolerance of married and unmarried people having a positive / negative attitude to loneliness are identified and compared.

The overcoming behaviour was estimated with the projective method “A person in the rain”.

Our study show the significantly higher indicator of “shared experience of loneliness” at unmarried people in comparison with that of married people (ρ≤0,002), as well as the higher indicator of “dependence on communication” (ρ≤0,05). As for psychological hardiness and a negative attitude to loneliness, “overall psychological hardiness” of married people is significantly higher compared to that of unmarried people (ρ≤0,002), mainly due to “challenge” indicator (ρ≤0,002). As for psychological hardiness and a positive attitude to loneliness, “overall psychological hardiness” of married people is significantly higher compared to that of unmarried people (ρ≤0.05). The greatest psychological hardiness is shown by married people with a positive attitude to loneliness, the lowest hardiness is shown by unmarried people and who perceive loneliness in a negative aspect.

The study of stress tolerance of married and unmarried people shows that married people prefer to use coping strategies such as “planning of problem solving”, “seeking for social support” and “confrontational coping”, while unmarried people prefer to use copying strategies such as “distancing”, “escape-avoidance” and “self-control”.

To obtain valid data about the unconscious level, we have developed a system of overcoming behaviour assessment based on the projective method “A person in the rain”. The correlation analysis between the scales of the standardized “Way of Coping Questionnaire” and the scales of the “A person in the rain” projective methodology showed that the proposed by us standardization of the projective method is valid for four scales: “confrontive coping”, “escape-avoidance”, “seeking social support” and “positive reappraisal”. The data on correlations for other four scales indicate necessity to make changes to selection from made drawings of the components determining the correspondence to certain coping strategies.

 

PDF 46-63 (Русский)

References

Aleksandrova, L.A. (2004). K kontseptsii zhiznestoykosti v psihologii [To the concept of resilience in psychology]. M.M. Gorbatova, A.V. Serov, M.S. Yanitskiy (Eds.), Sibirskaya psihologiya segodnya: Sb. nauchn. Trudov, 2, (pp. 82-90). Kemerovo: Kuzbassvuzizdat, [in Russian].

Ekimchik, O.A. (2017). Sovladanie s ezhednevnyimi stressorami v blizkih (partnerskih) otnosheniyah [Coping with daily stressors in close (partnership) relationships]. L.A. Golovey, A.V. Shaboltas (Eds.), Ananevskie chteniya – 2017: Preemstvennost v psihologicheskoy nauke: V.M. Behterev, B.G. Ananev, B.F. Lomov: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, (pp. 428-429). St. Petersburg: Aysing, [in Russian].

Kozintseva, P.A., & Novruzova, V.N. (2017). Opyit primeneniya proektivnyih metodik «Risunok cheloveka» i «Risunok cheloveka pod dozhdem» v issledovanii intra- i interpsihologicheskih osobennostey podrostkov [The experience of applying the projective techniques “Human Figure” and “Human Figure in the Rain” in the study of intra- and interpsychological characteristics of adolescents]. Yu.P. Grabozdin (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, (pp. 60-65). Samara: TsNIK [in Russian].

Kryukova, T.L. (2017). Sovladanie s zhiznennyimi stressami u partnerov blizkih otnosheniy: chto sposobstvuet pozitivnyim posledstviyam? [Coping with life stresses of partners in close relationships: what contributes to positive consequences?]. Vestnik KGU, 4, 70-76 [in Russian].

Kryukova, T.L., & Kuftyak, E.V. (2007). Oprosnik sposobov sovladaniya (adaptatsiya metodiki WCQ) [Questionnaire for coping methods (adaptation of the WCQ technique)]. Zhurnal prakticheskogo psihologa, 3, 93-112 [in Russian].

Kuftyak, E.V. (2014). Sovladanie i psihologicheskie zaschityi suprugov v period dinamicheskih krizisov [Possession and psychological defense of spouses during dynamic crises]. Nauchnyiy setevoy zhurnal «Meditsinskaya psihologiya v Rossii», (Vols. 6), 1 (24). – Retrieved from: http://mprj.ru/archiv_global/2014_1_24/nomer11.php [in Russian].

Lebedeva, L.D., & Nikonorova, Yu.V., & Tarakanova, N.A. (2006). Entsiklopediya priznakov i interpretatsiy v proektivnom risovanii i art-terapii [Encyclopedia of signs and interpretations in projective drawing and art therapy]. St. Petersburg: Rech [in Russian].

Leonova, A.B. (2016). Kompleksnyie psihologicheskie tehnologii upravleniya stressom i otsenka individualnoy stress-rezistentnosti: opyit integratsii razlichnyih issledovatelskih paradigm [Integrated psychological technologies for stress management and the assessment of individual stress resistance: the experience of integrating various research paradigms]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14. Psihologiya, 3, 63-72 [in Russian].

Leontev, D.A., & Rasskazova, E.I. (2006). Test zhiznestoykosti [Viability test]. Moscow: Smyisl [in Russian].

Mahnach, A.V. (2017). Zhiznesposobnost cheloveka kak predmet izucheniya v psihologicheskoy nauke [Human vitality as a subject of study in psychological science]. Psihologicheskiy zhurnal, (Vols. 38), 4, (pp. 5-16) [in Russian].

Mahover, K. (2003). Proektivnyiy risunok cheloveka [Projective drawing of man]. Moscow: Smyisl [in Russian].

Osin, E.N., & Leontev, D.A. (2013). Differentsialnyiy oprosnik perezhivaniya odinochestva: struktura i svoystva [Differential questionnaire of the experience of loneliness: structure and properties]. Psihologiya. Zhurnal Vyisshey shkolyi ekonomiki, (Vols. 10), 1, 55-81 [in Russian].

Oster, D., & Gould, P. (2001). Risunok v psihoterapii [Drawing in psychotherapy]. Moscow: ITsPK [in Russian].

Rodina, N.V. (2009). Koping-povedinka yak psihichna diyalnist sub’ekta [Coping behavior as a mental activity of the subject]. Visnik Odeskogo natsionalnogo universitetu. (Vols. 14), 6, (pp. 80-88) [in Ukrainian].

Romanova, E.V., & Syitko, T.I. (1992). Proektivnyie graficheskie metodiki [Projective graphic techniques]. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii. V 2-h chastyah. St. Petersburg: Didakt [in Russian].

Romanova, E.S. (2001). Graficheskie metodyi v prakticheskoy psihologii [Graphic methods in practical psychology]. St. Petersburg: Rech [in Russian].

Savenyisheva, S.S. (2016). Stressoryi povsednevnoy zhizni i semeynoe funktsionirovanie: analiz zarubezhnyih issledovaniy [Stressors of Everyday Life and Family Functioning: An Analysis of Foreign Studies]. Internet-zhurnal «Mir nauki». (Vols. 4), 6, 11-16. Retrieved from: http://mir-nauki.com/PDF/28PSMN616.pdf [in Russian].

Teylor, K. (2003). Psihologicheskie testyi i uprazhneniya dlya detey [Psychological tests and exercises for children]. Moscow: Aprel Press, izd-vo Eksmo [in Russian].

Tomas, O.D. (2009). Psihologichni mehanizmi efektivnosti rozvitku ta formuvannya osobistosti [Psychological mechanisms of efficiency of development and formation of personality]. Visnik Odeskogo natsionalnogo universitetu, (Vols. 14), 17, (pp. 397-401) [in Ukrainian].

Shipova, N.S. (2018). Diadicheskoe sovladanie «osobyih» par [Dyadic coping of "special" couples]. Nauchnyiy zhurnal «Yaroslavskiy pedagogicheskiy vestnik», 6 (105), 260-266 [in Ukrainian].

Shragina, L.I. (2014). Vyiyavlenie faktorov, vliyayuschih na razvitie vzroslogo cheloveka [Identification of factors affecting adult development]. Vestnik ONU im. I.I. Mechnikova. Psihologiya, (Vols. 19), 1 (31), 353-359 [in Ukrainian].

Psiadlo, E.M. (2016). Rol diagnostiki v psihologicheskoy pomoschi voditelyam i litsam, perenesshim stressogennyie situatsii na transporte [The role of psychological diagnosis for assistance drivers and persons who have suffered of stressful the transport situation]. Journal of Education, Health and Sport? Vol 6, 10, 566-577 [in Poland].

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright Notice

Articles in the Psychological Journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. For more detailed information, please, fallow the link - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/