CONTENT ANALYSIS OF SOCIAL EXPECTATIONS OF FUTURE SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGISTS
Igor Popovych
Kherson State University
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1663-111X
Olena Blynova
Kherson State University
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3011-6082
PDF 92-106 (Українська)

Keywords

internality
externality
activity
passiveness
openness
adequacy
inadequacy
ambivalence
polarity
content analysis

How to Cite

Popovych, I. and Blynova, O. (2019) “CONTENT ANALYSIS OF SOCIAL EXPECTATIONS OF FUTURE SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGISTS”, PSYCHOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 5(3), pp. 92-106. doi: 10.31108/1.2019.3.23.6.

Abstract

The article analyzes social expectations of future social psychologists, examines the results of research on the peculiarities of social expectations, and establishes psycholinguistic determinants of constructing social reality by personality.

It is emphasized that the variability of the demands of social environment predetermines the need for constant prognostic activity of the subject of life activity, not only in relation to natural object relations, but also in the sphere of social interaction, social communication, and speech constructing practices in the form of peculiar social expectations.

It is substantiated and proven that the strict quantification of texts, creation of a coding matrix, quantitative and qualitative content analysis, the empirical distribution of scales at all levels of the investigated parameters, the determination of correlation, ensure reliability, reliability and validity of the research of the psycholinguistic aspect of the social expectations of future social psychologists.

It is established that the future social psychologists by the properties of social expectations showed such indices: internality (51.43%), not contradicting the results obtained by other researchers; activity (57.13%), the results of which almost coincide with the internality by the quantitative and percentage values; moderate results of openness (47.52%), which may indicate maturity and social competence of one part of the subjects and at the same time inability or unwillingness to interpret, outline their expectations – the second part of the subjects.

It is proved that future social psychologists, interpreting the social field – define it, pay great attention to reflective aspects, take the position of «participant in the process».

It is noted that taking into account the age-related, interesting features of the sample objectively reflected the measurement of the properties of the expected social reality and indicated the quantitative and qualitative psychological parameters of the social expectations of personality. It is proved that the content analysis allows measuring human behavior. It is shown how the sign-semantic formations acquire subjective meanings, become objective factuality, that influence the construction of the social reality by the personality.

 

PDF 92-106 (Українська)

References

Бергер П., Лукман Т. Социальное конструирование реальности. Трактат по социологии знания / П. Бергер, Т. Лукман; [Пер. з англ. Е. Д. Руткевич]. ‑ М.: Медиум, 1995. – 323 с. Режим доступа URL http://skepdic.ru/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Berger_Lukman_-_Sotcialnoe_konstruirovanie_realnosti_Skepdic.ru_.pdf

Дронова И. Г. Проблема дискурсного конструирования социальной реальности / И. Г. Дронова, Е. А. Кожемякин // Научные ведомости Белгородского государственного университета. Серия: Философия. Социология. Право. – Белгород: 2008, т. 6, № 14 (54). – С. 5-11. Режим доступу URL http://dspace.bsu.edu.ru/handle/123456789/645

Злобіна О. Г. Соціальні орієнтації та локус очікувань: динаміка особистісних змін / О. Г. Злобіна // Соціальні виміри суспільства : зб. наук. праць. – Вип. 7. – К., 2004. – С. 25-42.

Йоргенсен М. В. Дискурс-анализ. Теория и метод / М. В. Йоргенсен, Л. Дж. Филлипс; [Пер с англ. А. А. Киселевой]. – 2-е изд., испр. – Х.: Изд-во «Гуманитарный центр», 2008. – 352 с. Режим доступу URL https://cyberleninka.ru/article/v/l-fillips-m-v-yorgensen-diskurs-analiz-teoriya-i-metod-per-s-angl-pod-red-a-a-kiselevoy-harkov-izd-vo-gumanitarnogo-tsentra-2004-336-s

Попович І. С. Психологія соціальних очікувань особистості: дис. на здобуття наук. ступеня докт. психол. наук: спец. 19.00.05 «Соціальна психологія; психологія соціальної роботи» / І. С. Попович; Херсонський державний університет МОН України. – Херсон, 2017. – 541 с. Режим доступу URL http://eKhSUIR.kspu.edu/handle/123456789/6465

Попович І. С. Роль соціально-психологічних очікувань у професійному становленні та розвитку особистості / І. С. Попович // Зб. наук. праць: філософія, соціологія, психологія. – Івано-Франківськ: Вид-во ДВНЗ «ПНУ імені Василя Стефаника», 2015. – Вип. 20. – Ч. 2. − С. 213-220. Режим доступу URL http://eKhSUIR.kspu.edu/handle/123456789/3291

Попович І. С. Типологічні особливості очікувань / І. С. Попович // Науковий вісник Херсонського державного університету. – Серія: психологічні науки: зб. наук. праць ХДУ / За ред. О. Є. Блинової. – Херсон: ВД «Гельветика», 2014. – Вип. 1. – Т. ІІ. – С. 64-70. Режим доступу URL http://eKhSUIR.kspu.edu/handle/123456789/3275

Davies В. Positioning: the discursive production of selves / B. Davies, R. Harre // J. for the theory of social behaviour. – Oxford, 2007. – Vol. 20, № 1. – P. 43-63. http://dx.doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.x

WMA Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. Retrieved from http://www.ub.edu/recerca/Bioetica/doc/Declaracio_ Helsinki_2013.pdf

References (Transliteration):

Berger, P. & Lukman, T. (1995). Sotsialnoe konstruirovanie realnosti. Traktat po sotsiologii znaniya [Social construction of reality. A Treatise on the Sociology of Knowledge]. Moscow: Medium [in Russian].

Dronova, I. G. (2008). Problema diskursnogo konstruirovaniya sotsialnoy realnosti [The problem of discursive construction of social reality]. Nauchnyie vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Scientific statements of Belgorod State University, 6, №14 (54), 5-11 [in Russian].

Zlobina, O. G. (2004). Sotsialni orientatsiyi ta lokus ochikuvan: dinamika osobistisnih zmin [Social orientation and locus of expectations: the dynamics of personality changes]. Sotsialni vimiri suspilstva – Social dimensions of society, 7, 25-42 [in Ukrainian].

Yorgensen, M. V. (2008). Diskurs-analiz. Teoriya i metod [Disourse-analysis. Teoriya i method]. Kharkiv: «Humanitarian Center» [in Russian].

Popovych, I. S. (2017). Psihologiya sotsialnih ochikuvan osobistosti [Psychology of social expectations of personality]. Doctor’s thesis. Kherson: Kherson State University [in Ukrainian].

Popovych, I. S. (2015). Rol sotsialno-psykholohichnykh ochikuvan u profesiinomu stanovlenni ta rozvytku osobystosti [The role of social and psychological expectations in the professional development and personality development] Filosofiia, sotsiolohiia, psykholohiia – Fhilosophy, sociology, psychology, 20, 213-220 [in Ukrainian].

Popovych, I. S. (2014). Typolohichni osoblyvosti ochikuvan [Typological peculiarities of expectations] Naukovyi visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu – Scientific Herald of Kherson State University, 1, 64-70 [in Ukrainian].

Davies, V. (2007). Positioning: the discursive production of selves. Journal for the theory of social behaviour, Vols. 20, 1, 43-63. Oxford [in English].

WMA Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. Retrieved from http://www.ub.edu/recerca/Bioetica/doc/Declaracio_ Helsinki_2013.pdf [in English].

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright Notice

Articles in the Psychological Journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. For more detailed information, please, fallow the link - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/