CREATION AND STANDARDIZATION OF “THE INTERSUBJECTNESS DIAGNOSTIC SURVEY”
Maria Nakonechna
Nizhyn Mykola Gogol State University
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2437-0853
PDF 55-73 (Українська)

Keywords

intersubjectness
method
standardization
psychodiagnostic values
reliability
validity

How to Cite

Nakonechna, M. (2019) “CREATION AND STANDARDIZATION OF ‘THE INTERSUBJECTNESS DIAGNOSTIC SURVEY’”, PSYCHOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 5(3), pp. 55-73. doi: 10.31108/1.2019.3.23.4.

Abstract

Intersubjectness concept includes such features of human co-operation, which are focused on unleashing the potential of a person, improvement of personal subjectness, balance of empathy and self-realization in communication. The article proves that intersubjectness is closely related with activity, creativity, responsibility and reflexivity and thus, actually, happens to be a projection of self-actualization idea (A. Maslow) on the plane of interpersonality relations.

The process of creation and standardization of Intersubjectness Diagnostic Survey lasted from August 2017 to February 2019, including pilot research and basic empiric research; results of the latter are presented in this article. 518 Ukrainian-speaking persons of young age with different residences and places of study (Nizhyn, Kyiv, Sumy, Chernihiv, Snovs’k, Pakul’) formed the test sample.  Cronbach's alpha for the sample α=0,831, that is quite good level (higher than 0,8) of internal co-ordination and reliability of the survey. Survey showed sufficient retest reliability (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient r=0,516, р≤0,01) among test values of high school students at 6-months intervals between psychodiagnostic cross sections. Through Student's t-distribution statistically meaningful difference in intersubjectness was revealed between groups of men and women, diagnosed by means of Intersubjectness Diagnostic Survey. To check survey’s validity, results were compared with values received using alternative methods, such as vitality test (E.M.Osin screening version), scale of general efficiency, test of life-meaning orientations, «Level of subjective control» questionnaire, questionnaire of reflectivity by A.V. Karpov, questionnaire of emotional empathy. Substantial cross-correlations with all scales and methods, which were compared with Intersubjectness Diagnostic Survey, proves constructive and convergent valifity of this psychodiagnostic tool.

Following factors were distinguished as the result of factor analysis: «Understanding of people and personal inspiration»; «Communication and co-operation»; «Accounting of other’s subject position»; «To hear other person and to be heard». Test norms were distinguished by means of z-scores with further calculation of low, middle and high levels of intersubjectness. The aim, research subject and field application of Intersubjectness Diagnostic Survey (by M. M. Nakonechna) are specified as well as detailed instruction to the questionnaire, its text and points calculation method.

 

PDF 55-73 (Українська)

References

Бажин Е. Ф. Метод исследования уровня субъективного контроля / Е.Ф. Бажин, Е.А. Голынкина, А.М. Эткинд // Психологический журнал, 1984. Том 5. №3. – С.152–162.

Бандура А. Теория социального научения / А. Бандура. – СПб.: Евразия, 2000. – 320 с.

Бурлачук Л. Ф. Психодиагностика / Л.Ф. Бурлачук. – СПб.: Питер, 2006. – 351 с.

Гржибовский А. М. Анализ трех и более независимых групп количественных данных / А.М. Гржибовский // Экология человека, 2008, №3. – С. 50–58.

Карпов А. В. Рефлексивность как психическое свойство и методики её діагностики / А.В. Карпов // Психологический журнал. 2003. Т. 24. № 5. – С. 45–57.

Леонтьев Д. А. Тест жизнестойкости / Д.А. Леонтьев, Е.И. Рассказова. – М.: Смысл, 2006. – 63 с.

Леонтьев Д. А. Тест смысложизненных ориентаций (СЖО) / Д.А. Леонтьев. 2-е изд. – М.: Смысл, 2000. – 18 с.

Митина О. В. Разработка и адаптация психологических опросников / О.В. Митина. – М.: Смысл, 2011. – 235 с.

Наконечна М. М. Інтерсуб’єктна взаємодія як баланс свободи та структури / М.М. Наконечна // Психологічний часопис, 2017, 10(6), С. 107-116. Available at: http://www.apsijournal.com/index.php/psyjournal/article/view/170 (Accessed: 6Березень2018).

Осин Е. Н. Краткая версия теста жизнестойкости: психометрические характеристики и применение в организационном контексте / Е.Н. Осин, Е.И. Рассказова // Вестник Московского университета. Серия №14. Психология. 2013. № 2. – С. 147–165.

Осин Е. Н. Факторная структура краткой версии Теста жизнестойкости / Е.Н. Осин // Организационная психология. 2013. Т. 3. №3. – С. 42–60.

Папуча М. В. Психологія ранньої юності / М.В. Папуча. – Ніжин: Редакційно-видавничий відділ НДПУ, 2001. – 137 с.

Ромек В. Г. Русская версия шкалы общей само-эффективности Р. Шварцера и М. Ерусалема / В.Г. Ромек, Р. Шварцер, М. Ерусалем // Иностранная психология, 1996, №7. – С. 71–77.

Психодиагностика толерантности личности // Под ред. Г.У. Солдатовой, Л.А. Шайгеровой. – М.: Смысл, 2008. – С. 72–75.

Хьелл Л. Теории личности (Основные положения, исследования и применение) / Л. Хьелл, Д. Зиглер. – СПб.: Издательство «Питер», 1999. – 608 с.

Bandura A. Exercise of Personal and Collective Efficacy in Changing Societies / A. Bandura // Bandura A. (Ed.) Self-efficacy in Changing Societies. – Cambridge University Press, 1999. – P. 1–45.

Bandura A. Guide for Constructing Self-efficacy Scales / A. Bandura // Self-efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents (ed. by F. Pajares, T. Urdan). – Greenwich, Connecticut: Information Age Publishing, 2006. – P. 307–337.

Crumbaugh J. C. An experimental study in existentialism: The psychometic approach to Frankl’s concept of noogenic neurosis / J.C. Crumbaugh, L.T. Maholick // Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1964, 20, P. 200–207.

Crumbaugh J. C. Manual of instructions for the Purpose in Life test / J.C. Crumbaugh, L.T. Maholick. – Murfeesboro, TN: Psychometric Affiliates, 1981.

Jerusalem M. Self-efficacy as a Resource Factor in Stress Appraisal Process / M. Jerusalem, R. Schwarzer // Schwarzer R (Ed.) Self-efficacy: Thought control of action. – Washington, DC: Hemisphere. – 1992. – P. 195–213.

Jerusalem M. Self-efficacy in Stressful Life Transitions / M. Jerusalem, W. Mittag // Bandura A. (Ed.) Self-efficacy in Changing Societies. – Cambridge University Press, 1999. – P. 177–201.

Muddy S. The Story of Hardiness: 20 Years of Theorizing, Research and Practice / S. Muddy // Consulting Psychology Journal. 2002. Vol. 54. – P. 173–185.

Muddy S. The Personality Construct of Hardiness III: Relationships with Repression, Innovativeness, Authoritarianism and Performance / S. Muddy, R. Harvey, D. Khoshaba, J. Lu, M. Persico, M. Brow // Journal of Personality. 2006. Vol. 74, №32. – Р. 575–598.

Muddy S. Hardiness: an Operationalization of Existential Courage / S. Muddy // Journal of Humanistic Psychology. 2004. Vol. 44, №3. – P. 279–298.

Rotter J. B. Internal versus External Control of Reinforcement: A Case History of a Variable / J.B. Rotter // American Psychologist, 1990, №45. – P. 489-493.

References (Transliteration):

Bazhin E. F. Metod issledovanija urovnja sub’ektivnogo kontrolja / E.F. Bazhin, E.A. Golynkina, A.M. Jetkind // Psihologicheskij zhurnal, 1984. Tom 5. №3. – S.152–162.

Bandura A. Teorija social'nogo nauchenija / A. Bandura. – SPb.: Evrazija, 2000. – 320 s.

Burlachuk L. F. Psihodiagnostika / L.F. Burlachuk. – SPb.: Piter, 2006. – 351 s.

Grzhibovskij A. M. Analiz treh i bolee nezavisimyh grupp kolichestvennyh dannyh / A.M. Grzhibovskij // Jekologija cheloveka, 2008, №3. – S. 50–58.

Karpov A. V. Refleksivnost' kak psihicheskoe svojstvo i metodiki ejo dіagnostiki / A.V. Karpov // Psihologicheskij zhurnal. 2003. T. 24. № 5. – S. 45–57.

Leont'ev D. A. Test zhiznestojkosti / D.A. Leont'ev, E.I. Rasskazova. – M.: Smysl, 2006. – 63 s.

Leont'ev D. A. Test smyslozhiznennyh orientacij (SZhO) / D.A. Leont'ev. 2-e izd. – M.: Smysl, 2000. – 18 s.

Mitina O. V. Razrabotka i adaptacija psihologicheskih oprosnikov / O.V. Mitina. – M.: Smysl, 2011. – 235 s.

Nakonechna M. M. Іntersub’ektna vzaєmodіja jak balans svobodi ta strukturi / M.M. Nakonechna // Psihologіchnij chasopis, 2017, 10(6), S. 107-116. Available at: http://www.apsijournal.com/index.php/psyjournal/article/view/170 (Accessed: 6Berezen'2018).

Osin E. N. Kratkaja versija testa zhiznestojkosti: psihometricheskie harakteristiki i primenenie v organizacionnom kontekste / E.N. Osin, E.I. Rasskazova // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Serija №14. Psihologija. 2013. № 2. – S. 147–165.

Osin E. N. Faktornaja struktura kratkoj versii Testa zhiznestojkosti / E.N. Osin // Organizacionnaja psihologija. 2013. T. 3. №3. – S. 42–60.

Papucha M. V. Psihologіja rann'oji junostі / M.V. Papucha. – Nіzhin: Redakcіjno-vidavnichij vіddіl NDPU, 2001. – 137 s.

Romek V. G. Russkaja versija shkaly obshhej samo-jeffektivnosti R. Shvarcera i M. Erusalema / V.G. Romek, R. Shvarcer, M. Erusalem // Inostrannaja psihologija, 1996, №7. – S. 71–77.

Psihodiagnostika tolerantnosti lichnosti // Pod red. G.U. Soldatovoj, L.A. Shajgerovoj. – M.: Smysl, 2008. – S. 72–75.

H’ell L. Teorii lichnosti (Osnovnye polozhenija, issledovanija i primenenie) / L. H’ell, D. Zigler. – SPb.: Izdatel'stvo «Piter», 1999. – 608 s.

Bandura A. Exercise of Personal and Collective Efficacy in Changing Societies / A. Bandura // Bandura A. (Ed.) Self-efficacy in Changing Societies. – Cambridge University Press, 1999. – P. 1–45.

Bandura A. Guide for Constructing Self-efficacy Scales / A. Bandura // Self-efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents (ed. by F. Pajares, T. Urdan). – Greenwich, Connecticut: Information Age Publishing, 2006. – P. 307–337.

Crumbaugh J. C. An experimental study in existentialism: The psychometic approach to Frankl’s concept of noogenic neurosis / J.C. Crumbaugh, L.T. Maholick // Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1964, 20, P. 200–207.

Crumbaugh J. C. Manual of instructions for the Purpose in Life test / J.C. Crumbaugh, L.T. Maholick. – Murfeesboro, TN: Psychometric Affiliates, 1981.

Jerusalem M. Self-efficacy as a Resource Factor in Stress Appraisal Process / M. Jerusalem, R. Schwarzer // Schwarzer R (Ed.) Self-efficacy: Thought control of action. – Washington, DC: Hemisphere. – 1992. – P. 195–213.

Jerusalem M. Self-efficacy in Stressful Life Transitions / M. Jerusalem, W. Mittag // Bandura A. (Ed.) Self-efficacy in Changing Societies. – Cambridge University Press, 1999. – P. 177–201.

Muddy S. The Story of Hardiness: 20 Years of Theorizing, Research and Practice / S. Muddy // Consulting Psychology Journal. 2002. Vol. 54. – P. 173–185.

Muddy S. The Personality Construct of Hardiness III: Relationships with Repression, Innovativeness, Authoritarianism and Performance / S. Muddy, R. Harvey, D. Khoshaba, J. Lu, M. Persico, M. Brow // Journal of Personality. 2006. Vol. 74, №32. – R. 575–598.

Muddy S. Hardiness: an Operationalization of Existential Courage / S. Muddy // Journal of Humanistic Psychology. 2004. Vol. 44, №3. – P. 279–298.

Rotter J. B. Internal versus External Control of Reinforcement: A Case History of a Variable / J.B. Rotter // American Psychologist, 1990, №45. – P. 489-493.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright Notice

Articles in the Psychological Journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. For more detailed information, please, fallow the link - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/